Originally posted by boarman
Kallis has scored more 50's and 100's and has a better average because he has played more matches and innings.
Yeah poor old Sobers and his team mates didnt have the luxury of todays players either ,so dont go on about playing on different pitches and grounds for away games,so i think your point is irrelevant
Ha!
Let's look at the stats objectively, OK? How about a quick average calculation.
Kallis 189 innings, Sobers 160.
Sobers made a 50 at a rate of 18.75% of his innings, Kallis at 23.81%
Sobers made a 100 at a rate of 16.25% of his innings, Kallis at 15.34%
So, Sobers had a 0.9% better conversion rate from 50 to a 100 than Kallis, but Kallis was much more CONSISTENT with a scoring rate of 50+ runs in an innings of 39.15%, slightly more than Sobers' 35%.
It's pretty close, but Kallis has a better average, so I'll have to tip my hat to him.
And don't post again that he has a better average because of more tests played, you are just looking silly. Average calculations are the great equaliser RUNS/INNINGS.
About my 'irrelevant' points:
Please! You are just changing the rules as we go along here!
You used the example of Sobers playing against less test nations, then when I shoot holes in your stupid theory, you just throw it out!
You sir, are full of crap, just like all the so called experts.
I'm using the stats available. It shows that Kallis is the best, with Sobers just on his heels.
I don't want to use other emotional ties and perceived different conditions, because those things can't be quantified.
All we have are the black on white stats.
Some people may still say that Sobers was better and I won't argue that too hard, but they are pretty damn close. Maybe even tied at the top.
Just don't try to convince me Sobers was much better than Kallis.
Give Kallis a few more seasons and he's going to put a nice bit of daylight between himself and Sobers.