12 Feb '08 21:37>
Originally posted by Palynkawell said!
[b]Undermining... Supporting a team is not always patting every coach and player of your club in the back. Sometimes, things are rotten and some public expressions of displeasure help.
Originally posted by PalynkaIf you, as a fan, have a problem with the manager, then you need to let the chairman know.
Undermining... Supporting a team is not always patting every coach and player of your club in the back. Sometimes, things are rotten and some public expressions of displeasure help. [b]Of course, some balance between servility and mob rule is the optimum.
Then again, I'm not surprised you don't know what supporting your team means.[/b]
Originally posted by RagnorakI don't consider it 'undermining' at all.
How does it feel to undermine your team?
D
Originally posted by RagnorakWhere does blade68 talk about booing during the game? He talks about massive protests AFTER the game, and he is now expressing his will to see the manager gone.
If you, as a fan, have a problem with the manager, then you need to let the chairman know.
Booing the players from the start of a game doesn't help your team. Boycotting your home games doesn't help your team.
If you wish to stage a protest after cheering on your team as best you could during the match, then feel free, but by the sounds of things, ...[text shortened]... bench), but I didn't realise that it was also shared by idiotic Portuguese "fans".
D
Originally posted by spurs73Mainly, I think, because the average club chairman has no imagination. So the same people just keep moving round the clubs - and every chairman somehow expects that this time will be different. They think that appointing an inexperienced manager is more risky than appointing an experienced manager who's just been kicked out down the road due to lack of success.
but he always gets a mention when ever a new vacancy comes up.
Also he has manged quite a few teams in the last 10 years.
dont know how he does it!!!
Originally posted by mtthwAbsolutely spot on mate!
Mainly, I think, because the average club chairman has no imagination. So the same people just keep moving round the clubs - and every chairman somehow expects that this time will be different. They think that appointing an inexperienced manager is more risky than appointing an experienced manager who's just been kicked out down the road due to lack of succe ...[text shortened]... tion of stupidity: continually doing the same thing, and expecting the outcome to be different.