22 May '08 21:16>
Originally posted by doctor rhythmFinally, a Cincinnati Reds fan on this site..........oh never mind. My bad. π³
well done united...champions of europe...and yes im a born and bred red π
Originally posted by jimslyp69No good live sport on free tv here .. we watch rugby up the pub on sky but virtually no real footy because of the time zones. Taken to getting DVDs of best goals etc .. enjoyable.
You watch too much English TV man! π
Originally posted by RagnorakThe point we were discussing was about spending money wisely. I've shown you that Liverpool have improved (and compared to United) under Benitez who has had less money to spend and started with a far poorer squad.
Nice "facts". Shall we fill in some more detail...
04/05 - 19 points difference
05/06 - 9 points difference
06/07 - 21 points difference
07/08 - 11 points difference.
Only a deluded scouser could see a pattern of improvement in those seemingly random figures.
But so long as you're happy that your team have improved to within 11 points of the top ...[text shortened]... ess, which means that you don't have the funds to compete with the big English clubs.
D
Originally posted by Angry BoyTorres 24M
Ferdinand £29M
Rooney £28M
Hargreaves £17M
Carrick £17M
Vidic £7M
Evra £7M
Nani £14M
Anderson £14M
Money helps though doesn't it?
Originally posted by Angry BoyI like the fact that you are happy finishing 4th, 11 points behind Manchester United and Trophyless for the last 2 seasons.
Benitez's net transfer dealings are £56.9M in his four years at LFC. Ferguson's is £73.4M for the same period and he didn't start 2004-05 with a team containing the likes of Traore, Smicer, Diao, Diouf, Cheyrou etc
Liverpool finished 11 points behind ManU this season, in 04-05 it was 19 points. So in Rafa's 4 years, Liverpool have closed the gap on Utd ...[text shortened]... irst league season yielded 58 points, this season it was 76.
How do you like them facts?
Originally posted by Angry BoyAgain you are quoting media spin.
The point we were discussing was about spending money wisely. I've shown you that Liverpool have improved (and compared to United) under Benitez who has had less money to spend and started with a far poorer squad.
As for ambition, of course I'd like us to have won the Premiership - but I can accept that it might not happen for some time. Quite simply, w ...[text shortened]... debt that ManUtd have. It would only take a poor season or two to make the interest unpayable.
Originally posted by Rooney Once a BlueWhere's the spin?
Again you are quoting media spin.
Liverpool's new owners put no debt on the club, right?
They are the best of friends, right?
The new stadium is on target, right?
If rafa wants snoopy dogg he can have him, right?
Gilette wants to sell to DIC, he's always had Liverpools best interests at heart, right?
Manchester United are worth over 1 billion on the open market I believe, right?
Originally posted by Angry BoyYour cowboy owners said they put no debt on the club - Is that correct?
Where's the spin?
And what the heck has anything else you've said got to do with it.
Originally posted by Rooney Once a BlueSo, to bring you back to the point.
Your cowboy owners said they put no debt on the club - Is that correct?
The media is reporting the new LFC stadium is in doubt.
Gilette is trying to sellout to DIC and make a quick profit, he says the arabs are ideal for Liverpool, just what the fans want, strange he outbid the Arabs, he's obviously a lifelong Reds fan.
Liverpool have to ...[text shortened]... ed at well over 1 billion, if we have debts of 800M like you said, i'd buy that for a dollar.
Originally posted by Angry Boyyou implied here that Man U have "bought" success which is true to a certain degree but no different to Pool or Chelsea.
Ferdinand £29M
Rooney £28M
Hargreaves £17M
Carrick £17M
Vidic £7M
Evra £7M
Nani £14M
Anderson £14M
Money helps though doesn't it?
Originally posted by Doyle78I think you need to read the thread through before you suggest what I've "implied".
you implied here that Man U have "bought" success which is true to a certain degree but no different to Pool or Chelsea.
You outline that Fergie has spent more than Rafa which may well be true however my point is that Ferguson has spent his money wisely in recent times.
You are measuring your clubs progress by how closer/ further away you are to/ fr ...[text shortened]... cess.....rotation, defennsive systems, character and style of play are every bit as important.
Originally posted by Angry BoyThe point we were discussing was about spending money wisely.
The point we were discussing was about spending money wisely. I've shown you that Liverpool have improved (and compared to United) under Benitez who has had less money to spend and started with a far poorer squad.
As for ambition, of course I'd like us to have won the Premiership - but I can accept that it might not happen for some time. Quite simply, w ...[text shortened]... debt that ManUtd have. It would only take a poor season or two to make the interest unpayable.
Originally posted by Ragnorakwhy are you worried? Are you going to bale them out with your own money if they got into troubleπ΅π΅π΅π΅π΅π΅π΅π΅π΅π΅π΅π΅π΅
However, you must be worried about the £800M of debt that ManUtd have.
Of course I'm worried.
Originally posted by spurs73How apt that a Spurs fan pops into a thread discussing how money doesn't always buy you success.
why are you worried? Are you going to bale them out with your own money if they got into troubleπ΅π΅π΅π΅π΅π΅π΅π΅π΅π΅π΅π΅π΅
edit: sorry Rag...just could not resist!