22 May '07 10:15>
Originally posted by SeitseCorrect.
Oh, so let me get this straight: Dull, defensive, long-ball, tight matches are [b]not representative of English football?[/b]
D
Originally posted by Ragnorakmmmhhh... then we have different views, impossible to match.
Correct.
D
Originally posted by SeitseYou are showing your ignorance of the Premier League with the teams that you chose as examples of defensive, long ball merchants.
I prefer to see Athletic Bilbao v. Nastic (bottom in the Spanish standings) than any Newcastle, West Ham, etcetera. But that's because that the style of game.
Originally posted by RagnorakActually I mentioned teams just to mention, so it is unfair to base your judgement on that. But do as you wish, because you are anglo-centric and nothing will change that flaw.
You are showing your ignorance of the Premier League with the teams that you chose as examples of defensive, long ball merchants.
Newcastle and West Ham would be good examples of ball playing teams.
If you'd said Chelsea or Watford or Bolton, then I'd have had to agree with you.
Did you watch the Man United v Roma game (7-1)? Or Man United v Mil e match, where 1 team's tactics was to spoil, and the other played well below par. 🙄
D
Originally posted by SeitseGood post and we are guilty as charged.
Actually I mentioned teams just to mention, so it is unfair to base your judgement on that. But do as you wish, because you are [b]anglo-centric and nothing will change that flaw.
Now, you can mention me 100 games with lots of goals, and most likely I've seen most of them and enjoyed them tremendously. I also can name you 100 matches in other leagues t ...[text shortened]... to consider English football dull. It is representative of the dullness I've witnessed before.[/b]
Originally posted by petrosianpupilNo criticism, mate. It's just a footie that does not fit my tastes, but maybe that's my problem for not understanding highly tactical and closed matches, who knows.
Good post and we are guilty as charged.
Shame your political views are not as balanced as your sporting ones.
Originally posted by SeitseYou seem to be arguing for the sake of it.
Actually I mentioned teams just to mention, so it is unfair to base your judgement on that. But do as you wish, because you are [b]anglo-centric and nothing will change that flaw.[/b]
Originally posted by RagnorakNot at all. That is the difference in this thread: I think the FA Cup final
You seem to be arguing for the sake of it.
I don't believe I ever stated that the Premier League is the best in the world. I just have a problem with somebody absurdly judging a League by 1 atrocious Cup match.
That match was so bad, that by the end, I was so lethargic, I actually wasn't bothered that we lost. If that was the football that I was w ...[text shortened]... week out with the Premiership, I'd take up something more enjoyably, like self-harming.
D
Originally posted by RagnorakAt least have some coherence. Weren't you saying that only Premiership matches are representative of the English league?
Did you watch the Man United v Roma game (7-1)? Or Man United v Milan (3-2) game? [...] Just look at Alan Smith's goal against Roma, http://youtube.com/watch?v=FFeeWYjXAq4, 1 touch pass, 1 touch pass, 1 touch pass, 1 touch pass, 1 touch GOAL!
Originally posted by SeitseWould you say the world cup final is representative of world football?
I think the FA Cup final is quite representative of English football.
Originally posted by rhbHate to break it to you, but there's no world league.
Would you say the world cup final is representative of world football?
2006 Penalties. Most memorable for the Zidane headbutt, hardly an advert for the beautiful game.
2002 Two Ronaldo goals. TBH I don't recall much of this game, but I don't think it was a thriller. The tournament memories (the small teams Korea and Turkey's amazing run to the semi's etc) ...[text shortened]...
So, on reflection, looking only at these one off finals, world football is dull. Discuss.
Originally posted by rhbThe more specific the sample the better the conclusion.
Would you say the world cup final is representative of world football?
2006 Penalties. Most memorable for the Zidane headbutt, hardly an advert for the beautiful game.
2002 Two Ronaldo goals. TBH I don't recall much of this game, but I don't think it was a thriller. The tournament memories (the small teams Korea and Turkey's amazing run to the semi's etc) ...[text shortened]... , world football is dull. Discuss.
Edit - have you considered the 2006 FA Cup final also?
Originally posted by rhbI'm starting to agree with Seitse 😞 in that you're a bunch of anal-retentive people.
Originally posted by Palynka
[b]Hate to break it to you, but there's no world league.
Re-read the words I quoted! No mention of a league there.
The FA cup final was a game between two Premiership clubs, so it is as representative of a Premiership game as any one game can be. Perhaps even more so, as it was between the top two clubs of that y ...[text shortened]... for Jose should they lose.
This cannot be held up as a representative game as a result.[/b]
Originally posted by rhbObviously RHB needs fast action supported by TV adverts to get his sporting fix.
Would you say the world cup final is representative of world football?
2006 Penalties. Most memorable for the Zidane headbutt, hardly an advert for the beautiful game.
2002 Two Ronaldo goals. TBH I don't recall much of this game, but I don't think it was a thriller. The tournament memories (the small teams Korea and Turkey's amazing run to the semi's etc) ...[text shortened]... , world football is dull. Discuss.
Edit - have you considered the 2006 FA Cup final also?