Originally posted by no1marauder
A simple bet (so you can understand it):
IF Oswalt wins more than he loses against the Reds this season (W-L - no decisions don't count), you win.
IF he loses more than he wins against the Reds this season(W-L - no decisions don't count), I win.
IF he wins the same number as he loses against the Reds ...[text shortened]... don't count), it's a push.
Stakes: $25.
In or out, Mary?
I already know you are hard headed, but i gave you credit (too much it appears) for not being ignorant too.
I am not wagering based on what any other pitcher in an Astros uniform does. I am wagering ONLY on Roy Oswalt, and the fact that the Reds won't "own him" as your original post suggested.
I will type this out slowly because it is apparent your comprehension skills are in short supply.
Under your "simplified plan" that "backs up your original statement in your eyes" ain't squat. Follow this example and you will see why your offer is not matching your statement.
For arguement's sake, let's say Oswalt throws 6 games against the Reds,
Game 1 Oswalt throws a complete game and loses 1-0 on an unearned run. He only gives up 2 hits in the game. ( record is 0-1)
Game 2 Oswalt throws 7 innings of shutout ball, leaves the game with a 4-0 lead. The Astros bullpen coughs up 5 runs and the Astros lose the game (record is still 0-1)
Game 3 The Reds nick Oswalt fo 5 hits and one earned run. Roy pitches 8 strong innings. Valverde gets nicked for a run in the top of the 9th, Astros win it in the bottom of the 9th. (record is still 0-1)
Game 4 Oswalt hurls a perfect game for 8 innings. He pulls his groin in the 9th and is force to leave the game witha tenuous 2-0 lead and a man on first. Hawkins comes in and promptly serves up a 2 run dinger to Bruce and the score is tied. The Astros finally win it in 13 innings. (record is still 0-1)
Game 5 Oswalt is human. He finally gives up 2 earned runs on 5 hits in 8 innings of work, but leaves the game with the score tied so he gets no decision. (record is still 0-1)
Game 6 Oswalt pitches 6 shutout innings and leaves with a blister problem in a 0-0 game. (record ends up 0-1)
The guy game up 2 earned runs and a dozen or so hits in 6 games and 46 innings pitched. As a former pitcher myself with plenty of credibility to back up my statements, Oswalt
dominated the Reds with a microscopic ERA of 0.39 and an average of .25 hits per inning allowed.
But in your scenrio, he loses the bet because he lost one and the Astros blew all of his leads in the other games, and you believe that will show that the Reds dominated him.
Sorry, that dog won't hunt. If you want to back up your stement, then we deal only with Oswalt's pitching against the Reds. The score at the time of his exit from the game will stand. Let his pitching stats speak to the "domination" not the Astros inabilities, and there will be plenty of those I believe this year.
Pony yourself up to the bar Mary and bet what you originally said,
not what you are trying to contrive. If you want to back this up, I will bet you as much as you want to put on the line, up to $100,000.00.
As a sign of exceptional faith, if you do sack up and take this bet backing up what you originally said, then i will also agree to take your hybrid bet that you are trying to pawn off as the true measure. And, because I am a sporting man, I will take that bet at the same level of value that you wager in the bet above.
Your move Nancy!!