Melanerpes is right - this is a potentially interesting exercise. We could do it for other sports as well. But it has absolutely no relation to what you're trying to prove.
Originally posted by Very Rusty Paly said:
The question is not if uzless knows more about ice hockey than me. I couldn't care less about ice hockey. The question is if I, having never played the game, would be able to reach the same level of understanding than him.
Obviously, the answer is YES, because my evidently superior intelligence (relative to uzless'😉 would eventually prevai ...[text shortened]... ave never played the game, but thought you could understand it as well as someone who had.
Originally posted by Palynka Reading comprehension FAIL.
Your above intelligence was going to give you the knowledge out of thin air. The comprehension fail gets old. You were wrong just admit it. Or at least make an honest stab at the question.
Originally posted by mtthw Melanerpes is right - this is a potentially interesting exercise. We could do it for other sports as well. But it has absolutely no relation to what you're trying to prove.
Originally posted by Very Rusty Your above intelligence was going to give you the knowledge out of thin air. The comprehension fail gets old. You were wrong just admit it. Or at least make an honest stab at the question.
Errr... No. My above intelligence would make me able to learn the game IF I DECIDED TO STUDY IT.
Intelligence is the ability to learn and think, not knowledge about all issues on this earth.
Originally posted by Palynka Errr... No. My above intelligence would make me able to learn the game IF I DECIDED TO STUDY IT.
Intelligence is the ability to learn and think, not knowledge about all issues on this earth.
So, now you're setting up a hypothetical situation. IF i were to STUDY IT...Well that is what many of the commentators do especially from the U.S. and some do a great job, but others don't have a clue and get things mixed up on a routine basis.
( It is a good thing they have the colour guys, pros who have played the game to correct them)
You could study the game as long as you wanted and MIGHT become as good as some of the commentators who have learned the game through books and other knowledgeable people, but you would still miss many things. To think you could get to know the game as well, or better than someone who played it, especially at a semi-pro or Pro level is inane at best even for you.
Originally posted by Very Rusty LOL...It is a doorknob you noob! 😛
I really don't think you are half as bright as you think you are. (Palynka) Paly! 😵
dumb as a doorknob wins the google search, by a small surprising margin.
Dumb as a doornail is a distant third.
That in no way makes any right... "Brain and Brain, what is Brain" (original Star Trek) lost to a misquote some time back. I think RHB found the sound-bite.