Go back
2008 Championship

2008 Championship

Tournaments

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by surtism
625 now! Cracking!
640 entrants!

Vote Up
Vote Down

..i have no sponsor yet...am not going to play unless i get a sponsor...

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by reinfeld
..i have no sponsor yet...am not going to play unless i get a sponsor...
you would need a 30 point head start to get a sponser 😛

Vote Up
Vote Down

.no..a sponsor could send a nice gift in the mail and i would mention the sponsors name all the time in the message box...say....you send me a cake in the mail fed exspress....i mention you every time i lose a piece in the game..you get publicity..i get cake...do we have a deal ?....

Vote Up
Vote Down

closed to new entrants now... that's wierd I thought it closed jan 1st..

guess i can't drop out now 😛.

Vote Up
Vote Down

..and i did not get a sponsor so you will not see me in the tournament...

Vote Up
Vote Down

It's open again. I'm in... what madness awaits?! I've not played that many games with that fast time control for ages.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Dance Master MC
640 entrants!
690 entrants!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by UserChevy
690 entrants!
695. Almost 700 now.

Vote Up
Vote Down

700!

Vote Up
Vote Down

730 now and still growing!!

I should warn you all that I am on form right now so the tournament is probably mine. 🙂

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Pigface1
730 now and still growing!!
...
Given that the tournament is intended as three rounds long, and currently has group size 9.

An interesting equation is: 9x9x9=729.

At what point is it worth raising the groupsize for the tournament to 10?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by flexmore
Given that the tournament is intended as three rounds long, and currently has group size 9.

An interesting equation is: 9x9x9=729.

At what point is it worth raising the groupsize for the tournament to 10?
Never.

You are assuming that there will only be 1 person from each group moving on. That is not the case.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by flexmore
Given that the tournament is intended as three rounds long, and currently has group size 9.

An interesting equation is: 9x9x9=729.

At what point is it worth raising the groupsize for the tournament to 10?
Given that the 2007 Tourney only had 590 entrants and the original groups were of 9 and 10, I would say that something similar will happen and you may find group sizes are 10 and 11.

With 748 entrants, group sizes of 10 will give 75 groups which is 10 more than last year.

You could be looking at 68 groups of 11, meaning an extra 4 games per person in the first round.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by adramforall
Given that the 2007 Tourney only had 590 entrants and the original groups were of 9 and 10, I would say that something similar will happen and you may find group sizes are 10 and 11.

With 748 entrants, group sizes of 10 will give 75 groups which is 10 more than last year.

You could be looking at 68 groups of 11, meaning an extra 4 games per person in the first round.
groupsize 11 is a bad idea ... it will mean that the third round will only have a very few players ... and the disaster of a final round draw becomes unnecessarily likely.

groupsize 10 will mean that the first two rounds have 10 players but the last round might only have 8.

groupsize 9 might still be the best, even with 800 players : it will mean the first two rounds have only 9 players per group but the final round has 10 or 11 making a draw in the last round highly unlikely.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.