15 Aug '07 18:21>
i'm not bitter. I am for a "fair" vacation system that is actually a vacation system. "Sanctimonious lies!" good heavens. Such words.
Originally posted by RagnorakI have no problem with heng nor how he has used the vacation system but in the interests of fairness my 2 games against him in Tournament 2058 did hold up the start of round 2.
Specifically which tournaments that the 2 of you are taking part in, is heng holding up? Why do you feel the need to tell lies about somebody like that (that heng is holding up tournaments)? Who do you think you are to tell somebody they can't use the pre-agreed time controls as they wish? Would you kick somebody under the table in an OTB match, when you ...[text shortened]... e your sanctimony and lies at home, and just time heng out if you get the chance.
D
Originally posted by RagnorakYou need to get a life.
Specifically which tournaments that the 2 of you are taking part in, is heng holding up? Why do you feel the need to tell lies about somebody like that (that heng is holding up tournaments)? Who do you think you are to tell somebody they can't use the pre-agreed time controls as they wish? Would you kick somebody under the table in an OTB match, when you ...[text shortened]... e your sanctimony and lies at home, and just time heng out if you get the chance.
D
Originally posted by ItsYouThatIAdoreMy only request is that he starts resigning his lost games. It doesn't have to be the ones that he should lose, but he is playing out a K, R, 2p vrs K + p (not passed). I can't think of any 1700 who will slip up even while blitzing that. the pawns are even at the wrong end of the board to give any stalemate chances.
This is all kind of funny still. Think about it this way, if Heng is in a lossing position, but waits until the 21 day mark to move in his game, is he delaying the game just keep his rating up? Or is he just not moving because he feels he has faster time controls in other games, and gives them priority. furthermore, Heng spends very little time ana but I believe he is right in some sense, hence why he is one of the best players on this site.
Originally posted by zebanoWell he is still reading this ๐ He just resigned the game with a note "as requested".
My only request is that he starts resigning his lost games. It doesn't have to be the ones that he should lose, but he is playing out a K, R, 2p vrs K + p (not passed). I can't think of any 1700 who will slip up even while blitzing that. the pawns are even at the wrong end of the board to give any stalemate chances.