29 Oct '06 14:53>2 edits
This post is unavailable.
Please refer to our posting guidelines.
Originally posted by Sicilian SmaugCheck out this site idea...Thread 52938
Hear hear!! Since breaking 1700 (after much hard work) I now have next to no chance of winning a tournamount. It's always 1700+ banded tournamounts which are won by GuaravV or other similar players. That is the biggest traversty going on in the RHP tournamounts by far.
Originally posted by RagnorakI wouldn't call 1200 players "Special Olympics" material,
[b]So what you're saying is that the Special Olympics should be done away with, and women should have to compete with men in all sports?
Originally posted by caissad4Not everybody is born with the faculties to become Master or near Master material.
I wouldn't call 1200 players "Special Olympics" material,
People in Special Olympics are actually competing at their highest level or at least putting their best effort into it.
Unlike 1200 players.
So you believe that 1200 players are somehow inferior or damaged making it impossible for them to compete with superior chessplayers. I was once a 1200 playe ...[text shortened]... 50. Must be magic.
I have also won 7 city chess championships competing against men,
Angela
Originally posted by caissad4I'm not in the least bit angry. Why should I be? Am I the one who is angry enough to have written 30+ posts on one subject and who has cancelled their subscription due to this? (On a side note, why do you, a 2000+ player, want to play 1200 rated players so much that you'll embark on a crusade to change the system and undermine the site admin?)
Dear Rag,
You must be angry indeed. The truth hurts.
You choose to ignore much of the content of my posts.
I merely suggested one site, not sites as you falsely state in your post, which offers specific features which people here had been complaining were lacking at Red Hot Pawn. The site you called a "joke" is clearly not a better IT site than Red Hot ...[text shortened]... ns from its' customers regarding tournament structuring.
BTW Are you a Republican?
Angela
Originally posted by Ragnorak (On a side note, why do you, a 2000+ player, want to play 1200 rated players so much that you'll embark on a crusade to change the system and undermine the site admin?). Have you ever sent feedback to site admin to complain, or do you expect admin to read all your posts?If you have read all my posts then you are deliberately attemptimg to mislead people on the true comtent. I believe that is one of the definitions of a lie.
Tell me Angela... you accuse 1200 people of being lazy, apologies... LAZY and you say the ems constructive? Or is bashing admin and lower rated players constructive in your mind?
D[/b]
Originally posted by caissad4Hey genius, pluralise apology for me, would you? 😕
If you have read all my posts then you are deliberately attemptimg to mislead people on the true comtent. I believe that is one of the definitions of a lie.
I never said that I wanted to play 1200 players. Apologise, lol.
I suggested that we should have half tourneys as not banded. (Read my posts)
Yes I have sent feedback as many others have and admin ha ...[text shortened]... nd know the definition of "lie".
Are you sure that you are not just a wee bit angry, lol.
Originally posted by caissad4Now I know why I am no good at chess, I have above normal intelligence 🙂
I hereby apoligise that most 1200 players either don't care about or are too lazy to work hard to improve their chess ability,
World Chess Champion Emmanuel Lasker was quoted as saying that anyone of normal intelligence could become a master at chess.
Originally posted by pawnofthedeadI will assume that you have read my posts which point out that many 1200 players choose to complain about playing anyone who outrates them by more than 200 points and seem to have convinced admin to run continual banded tourneys,
[b]In response to: A player rated 1200 is either lazy or doesn't want to improve their game.
I coached recreational sports year round for 9+ years. I had a son who played and was mostly mediocre. I kept driving him to excel I understand the comments re: unequally matched players in tournaments. Please don't insult me as being under 1200 if I choose to ' ...[text shortened]... a subscriber and if I choose to play for fun,I would be glad to match resumes with you anytime,
Originally posted by caissad4Have you ever played a game casually? Does it remain fun if you lose every single game?
I will assume that you have read my posts which point out that many 1200 players choose to complain about playing anyone who outrates them by more than 200 points and seem to have convinced admin to run continual banded tourneys,
Under the new banded system 1700 players must play 2200 pkayers while 1200 players play under 1400 players. This is clearly not ...[text shortened]... o complain are not casual players.
You seem to be a casual player who plays chess for fun.