It's a Knock Out Tounament...

It's a Knock Out Tounament...

Tournaments

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

U

Steelers Country

Joined
12 Apr 02
Moves
32833
15 Jan 03

...thread

stitching you up

Joined
08 Apr 02
Moves
7146
17 Jan 03

does anybody know how the pairings are to be done for this tourney? Random or by rating? Or another way?
Just my preferance, but wouldn't random be better?

h
King of ... Stuff

Canada

Joined
30 Nov 02
Moves
2901
17 Jan 03

Originally posted by belgianfreak
does anybody know how the pairings are to be done for this tourney? Random or by rating? Or another way?
Just my preferance, but wouldn't random be better?
I'd prefer random as well.

Knock, Knock...?

Edinburgh, Scotland

Joined
18 Mar 02
Moves
46924
17 Jan 03

Just my preferance, but wouldn't random be better?
I agree, in my last tournament i got the best player and my dad (whos rating was 1 above mine got the lowest player).

I would also prefer random

David 🙂

Joined
15 Aug 02
Moves
34641
18 Jan 03

I think that's a big vote for randomness - how about it Russ/Chris ?

Knock, Knock...?

Edinburgh, Scotland

Joined
18 Mar 02
Moves
46924
19 Jan 03

Originally posted by jscar
I think that's a big vote for randomness - how about it Russ/Chris ?
please

m

Joined
21 Aug 02
Moves
42573
21 Jan 03



Well, against similarly rated opponents I do okay (win some, lose some) Against people 300 points ( and even 200) above me I have been getting smashed. Maybe you could group players into a range, then go random. Just my two cents.http://www.timeforchess.com/board/newpost.php?threadid=3551&frompage=1#
http://www.timeforchess.com/images/forums/sml-tongue.gif

t

Joined
19 Aug 02
Moves
101509
21 Jan 03

Totally random. Makes the tournament more interesting for lesser players, especially players in my range.

mike

l
Free Thinker

New York City

Joined
22 Mar 02
Moves
10815
21 Jan 03

I vote for random as well. I think if the tournament is set up so that the highest rated player plays against the lowest, the second highest plays against the second lowest, then you're almost guaranteeing who will be in the final, whereas with random we could see some very interesting upsets and matchings.

-mike

S
The Diplomat

Slightly Left :D

Joined
22 Jun 01
Moves
8518
21 Jan 03

I have a suspicion that someone with a 1348 rating might have a shot at winning....but that is just a guess.

So don't think ALL of the top guys will advance.

Dave

U

Steelers Country

Joined
12 Apr 02
Moves
32833
21 Jan 03

Originally posted by legionnaire
I vote for random as well. I think if the tournament is set up so that the highest rated player plays against the lowest, the second highest plays against the second lowest, then you're almost guaranteeing who will be in the final, whereas with random we could see some very interesting upsets and matchings.

-mike
What if it was the highest against the 2nd highest
and the lowest aginst the 2nd lowst...and so on?

-Adam

m

Joined
11 May 02
Moves
3408
21 Jan 03

I'm in and can't wait for it to start.
I vote for random.

TEA PARTY MEMBER

St Maarten, Neth Ant

Joined
21 Jun 02
Moves
1045183
21 Jan 03

Originally posted by mariposa
I'm in and can't wait for it to start.
I vote for random.
I do agree with the sweet butterfly despite she has shown her "bee-tendencies" !!!! LOL
Random, but the path should be stated like the winners from the group 1 and 3 meets in the second round. The winner meets the winner of group 5 and 7 winners!.....

Sincerely,

Harri
a.k.a. Luck

Knock, Knock...?

Edinburgh, Scotland

Joined
18 Mar 02
Moves
46924
21 Jan 03

Originally posted by Schliemann
I have a suspicion that someone with a 1348 rating might have a shot at winning....but that is just a guess.

So don't think ALL of the top guys will advance.

Dave
your still in the top half and would get a worse opponent thouhg.

David

l
Free Thinker

New York City

Joined
22 Mar 02
Moves
10815
21 Jan 03

Originally posted by UncleAdam
What if it was the highest against the 2nd highest
and the lowest aginst the 2nd lowst...and so on?

-Adam
That would be interesting, if a bit unusual. Then for the best player, your toughest games would likely be at the beginning of the tournament and get progressively easier, while the players with lower rankings would face progressively harder games. Again, this is assuming that rating is an adequate barometer of skill, which may or may not be the case (sorry about that, Dave.)

-mike