Duane Eddy.
https://edition.cnn.com/2024/05/02/entertainment/duane-eddy-death-scli-intl/index.html
https://edition.cnn.com/2024/05/02/entertainment/duane-eddy-death-scli-intl/index.html
@averagejoe1 saidThe jury is deliberating. The reason it has been long getting this far is that Trump delays and stalls and appeals and intimidates witnesses and delays again and appeals to the SCOTUS claiming executive privilege and total immunity for ever and ever, and complains that he shouldn't have to stand trial because it is 'politically motivated', because 'he has a campaign to run', and because 'he should be attending his wife's birthday party'.
I hereby introduce for the record the Marauder post, just above, which says all this ad nauseum, leaving me once again to ask………why has the prosecution not rested, why does the jury not have the case in the jury room? If Marauder has all this, why doesn’t the jury? Hello? Could it be there are no facts for them to deliberate? Seems Marauder has laid out the law, but short on facts, which is the responsibility of the jury to deliberate.
@carnivorum saidNegative on all counts.
About the duons that peer reviewed scientific article says:
"dual coding is nearly impossible by chance"
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17511511
If it cannot come into being by chance, then it has to come into being by intelligent design.
And intelligent design proves an Intelligent Designer.
@very-rusty saidI honestly don't know remember where my 50s went. They zoomed by so quickly. I passed 65 several years ago. I now consider myself to have arrived at 'advanced middle age.'
Hey if we happen to be over 65 we are seniors whether we like or not. 😉
I'd give you a race if you were closer, but I'd have to get some sneakers on instead of my slippers. 🙂
-VR
@very-rusty saidOK, Rusty. Now mellow out, or I'll break your arm !
moon,
I am trying to mellow out, now don't get me stirred up! 😛 🙂
-VR
@very-rusty saidOh the irony. When have you ever played your cards close to your chest ?
I have bias when it comes to the OP of this thread, so would be wise to keep my comments to myself, in the Public Forum. 🙂
-VR
@the-gravedigger saidWell, if you go picking a fight with someone packing a Smith & Wesson, you should expect that.
I disagreed with my shooter and he shot me.
@greenpawn34 saidCentralising is great for chess, but lousy for the economy.
HI moonbus
One thing I remember was two strong players going over a game. The most common
phrase was 'centralise' and 'centralise' and 'centralise'.... I was thinking big deal but
what are you threatening. (then I was at the stage you must be either threatening or
defending with every move....preferably threatening something.)
It took a while to sink in and even ...[text shortened]... approach but
at least now I knew why my attacks were getting knocked back. I ignored centalisation.
@divegeester saidNegative. It's cats. Cats, I tell you. We domesticated dogs, but cats domesticated us. They took one look around at all the animals in Eden and asked themselves, 'which one is most likely to invent tin openers if we rub ourselves against their legs and purr?' Yup, we're it.
Leave the dogs alone Sir… dogs represent the pinnacle of evolution
@kellyjay saidThe fundamental logical error you and Creationists generally are making is this: you confuse intelligibilty with intelligence. A thing can be intelligible (to us) without being intelligent (in-itself). You are merely projecting your own designs and metaphors (error-checking, start-stop mechanisms, etc.) into nature.
The point of acknowledging design doesn't prove God, it proves design over a mindless process nothing more. God can only be known when we seek God and God calls, but even there we can suppress God's call, just as we can suppress evidence by refusing to acknowledge what we see to avoid philosophical ramifications evidence points to.
@the-gravedigger saidI disagree with your disagreement.
I disagree.