Search by Author (Last month only)
Public forum posts since 05 Apr '24 .
Enter the exact name of the post author
  1. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    03 May '24 05:30
    @boonon
    Well we have one in our own family, kidnapped and raped for 3 months before the perp was caught so you know nothing about that issue. Assshole.
  2. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    03 May '24 05:252 edits
    @AverageJoe1
    I bet you don't even know what I am talking about, Cavanaugh writing a piece about that subject 20 odd years ago do you.
    I guess you also figure SCOTUS as it stands right now is totally fair, unbiased, pulse on the lives of common folk, taking no bribes, NOBODY sells out to billionaires, right?

    As long as they protect your god they are fair, but the first time they vote against him, HANG THOSE CORRUPT SOB's.
  3. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    03 May '24 05:221 edit
    Talk about crazies trying to take over.
    Looks like there were SOME adults in the room.

    https://apnews.com/article/arizona-governor-abortion-ban-1864-signing-07bba2fa805971be62b800bd89c81a5a

    All the dems voted yea, get rid of that old law, TWO repubs did the same.
    Repubs really have the pulse of the people eh.
  4. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    03 May '24 05:20
    @Sleepyguy
    On another note, what is HRO going to do with the exit of MFJ? Their book will be about ten pages smaller. Also who will take up the slack?
  5. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    03 May '24 05:18
    @Earl-of-Trumps
    And you would do 'em both at the same time.
  6. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    03 May '24 05:14
    @AverageJoe1
    So you would rather have a POTUS who falls asleep in his own felony trial and farts while asleep, talk about him calling Biden Sleepy Joe.
    Like you have done a thousand times. He did speak on the protests but I guess you won't find it on newsmax. I saw it myself.
    I guess that governor lady who shoots puppies won't be FPOTUS' running mate, but I thought that lady would be JUST the one he would like.
  7. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    03 May '24 05:10
    @mchill
    Like we used to put up a table and sell lemonade when we were 10, I guess that makes us criminals just like those wretched candy sellers. Even more wretched, delivering newspapers like I did when I was 12, THRASH THAT SOB.
  8. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    02 May '24 18:05
    @AverageJoe1
    AOC would be a REAL president unlike your POS FPOTUS now on trial in a number of courts. She would be head and shoulder better than your shyte for leadership god whom you worship above whatever religion you used to believe in, now replaced with the Trumpite religion. How many Trump bibles did you buy to give to your friends?
  9. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    02 May '24 18:01
  10. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    02 May '24 18:00
    @AverageJoe1
    What do you mean WE white man? YOU are already convinced there is no crime and if he is convicted it just proves to you how corrupt the court is AND how corrupt the Jury is even though there are republicans on the jury as well, they must have all been bought off, right?
  11. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    02 May '24 17:57
    @AverageJoe1
    What are you going to do or say if by some horrible thing T is reelected and he turns out to be the dictator bent on only revenge for those whom he thinks wronged him and zero in the way of policy except maybe another tax cut bribe to the ultrawealthy and starts using our military to quell peaceful protests and starts caging twice as many children in cages, I guess all that would be perfectly fine with you, no more democracy and a dictator running things, banning even more books, prosecuting women for going to a free state for abortions. Would you be ok with that. And 'it will never happen like that is not the premise' The thing is what IF that happens, how would you respond?
  12. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    02 May '24 17:49
    @AverageJoe1
    It is no doubt ad nauseum to you but I can say it is not ad nauseum to the judge or the jury, which btw has repubs there also and it only takes one not guilty vote to kill the conviction.
    And of course your backup is CORRUPT COURT. Which it apparently is only for Trump, anyone else including dudes like Cohen, totally clean court but for Trump, ANY guilty verdict is corrupt since you know your god is above the law.
  13. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    02 May '24 17:44
    @Suzianne
    Right🙂 Fake news all generated by AI, I imagine that would be the wingnut response.
  14. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    02 May '24 06:48
    @Earl-of-Trumps
    Which won't work because Dems are rescuing him from a crazed woman who should not even be a county dog catcher much less a sitting congressman. Or woman I guess.
  15. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    02 May '24 03:381 edit
    @AverageJoe1
    Why don't they rest? Because they have an airtight case and are introducing more damning evidence as if Pecker's testimony wasn't enough. There will be lots more dirt to follow, solid evidence not political persecution.
    Your god denying any contact with either of those women will not sit well with the jury who BTW are NOT corrupt and NOT 95% dems like your god farted again.
Back to Top

Search Site Content

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree