After reading this thread I feel the need to make comment.
I got into Oxford University (John Ruskin college to be exact) in 1984, and I turned it down. I turned it down primarily for 2 reasons. 1. I wanted to design cars, and use my maths and physics A'levels, for which I had studied so hard. 2. I went to Ruskin college, after they accepted me, for a visit, 2 months before I was due to enrol. I couldn't believe what I saw. My own work had been with mixing plastics and crayons with water colours to achieve special effects, which the college loved.
I considered my work to be somewhat loose, but still tight with visual representation of understanding of what one was visually seeing, and not needing to create psychological BS to interpret it.
Upon my first visit to Ruskin College (which I think since dissolved) I WAS horrified. I saw Coke cans smelted together, as well as elastic bands knotted together hanging from a ceiling looking like mucus from a nose. I WAS told this is art, and I shall be a part of it. I was bemused, and left never to return.
However, even after years of disliking what I saw, my attitudes changed slowly. I honestly couldn't be doing with tax payer's money being spent on piles of bricks (2 million quid to that artist!), and a sectioned cow in preservatives that also cost multi-millions. But then, if you think about it, the artist is using today's medium - even technology. Comparing today's wrok with the impressionists is not relevant, because they just changed subject matter to real life, whilst continuing in the same mediums. They moved away from the all God and Church continued subject matter to the streets, restaurants, working girls (a la Degas), theatre, beaches and fields and so on.
I, personally, still have problems with what is termed 'modern art' - but it can't be argued that it is modern.
With regard to Seitse's initial idea, that it shouldn't be funded by tax payer's money, I can't agree more. There are few tax payers who can even afford the entry fee to 'special exhibitions' and see what they have contributed to, and even to see if it is paletable to their own understanding.
A pile of bricks I don't see as art, but a sectioned cow may one day be seen as modern day impressionism for the year 2000.
-m.