For those that may be unaware...men trying to get women's panties off has been going on quite some time. I think what we have now is women will spend three hours putting on makeup, stretching tight fitting clothes on and doing all they can to draw attention to themselves and when they get it they feign offense. Nothing more than a power trip. And what the hell, if you can gain politically that's is just a bonus.
Why no men making sexual assault claims?
Originally posted by @vivifyI'm not the one saying, "The entire U.S. legal system needs to be revamped." Yes, every system has its problems. We don't need to trash a system that has been working for almost 250 years in favor of another with bigger potential problems. 'Tweaking' is one thing. Scrapping and revamping is another.
The point of my suggestion is to remove the power of a defendant's financial standing. If anyone doesn't like the details of my suggestion, fine; put forth your own ideas of how to prevent rich people from buying their way out of justice being served. It's pretty damn easy to criticize ideas when you've put none of your own to be scrutinized.
Originally posted by @mott-the-hoopleThis is a joke, right?
For those that may be unaware...men trying to get women's panties off has been going on quite some time. I think what we have now is women will spend three hours putting on makeup, stretching tight fitting clothes on and doing all they can to draw attention to themselves and when they get it they feign offense. Nothing more than a power trip. And wh ...[text shortened]... if you can gain politically that's is just a bonus.
Why no men making sexual assault claims?
Originally posted by @mott-the-hoopleThat's because of the system we have in place now.
Weinstein, Lauer, Franken ECT. might argue your point.
Try to follow along. You can read, can't you?
2 edits
Originally posted by @suzianneFair point.
I'm not the one saying, "The entire U.S. legal system needs to be revamped." Yes, every system has its problems. We don't need to trash a system that has been working for almost 250 years in favor of another with bigger potential problems. 'Tweaking' is one thing. Scrapping and revamping is another.
Any suggestions how the system could be "tweaked" so that the rich don't buy their way out of justice? Care to put something forward? Not that you aren't doing great in sitting back and doling out righteous criticism.
Originally posted by @great-king-ratDo you mean Bill Clinton too, or just Trump?
It's much worse than that; in this parody of a country you live in you can exhibit that kind of behaviour and even become president 😲
Originally posted by @eladarI was talking about Trump.
Do you mean Bill Clinton too, or just Trump?
Would you like to talk about Clinton some more? I've noticed many right wingers prefer to talk about previous presidents if it means they don't have to talk about Trump.
Because apparently, if you don't talk about it, it's not true.
Originally posted by @great-king-ratSo you don't care about Clinton who actually raped women, let alone all the underage girls he had sex with.
I was talking about Trump.
Would you like to talk about Clinton some more? I've noticed many right wingers prefer to talk about previous presidents if it means they don't have to talk about Trump.
Because apparently, if you don't talk about it, it's not true.