1 edit
@PuzZuLz saidIf countries have variable importance and relevance, then so do individuals.
Same as you and Shavixmir on a single person level and scale.
On the global scale? Canada trumps the Netherlands by far.
North America has Northern euro beaten by a landslide. It's not even the same sport.
As an aside, Britain had a greater global impact for a longer stretch of time than the US.
@PuzZuLz saidErrr… no, we have no black people, Asians or Middle Eastern people here at all.
@Great-King-Rat
69 percent is a lot less than your almost 80 percent and we are bringing in one million a year who are not white.
Your pathetic country doesn't even compare to western countries that are being bombarded with immigrants.
Any Indians over there? Any blacks? Chinese? Malaysian? Middle East?
10 percent of our population is from India and that happened ...[text shortened]... nd.
Our economy is crashing. That's why people think we will have to join the USA. Just to survive.
We had a Moroccan once, I believe, but we managed to catapult him back to Morocco.
You enormous imbecile.
- Joined
- 18 Aug 26
- Moves
- 481
@Sprogladog saidAnd your preferred method would be what exactly?
You missed off killing dictators that then get replaced by younger more extreme dictators and kicking the piss out of extremists and then creating younger generations of extremists. Yaaay well done America!!!!
This should be interesting 🤔
@Ghost-of-a-Duke saidNothing the incellic cvnt says is aftually worth the steam off your piss.
If countries have variable importance and relevance, then so do individuals.
- Joined
- 18 Aug 26
- Moves
- 481
@Great-King-Rat saidFrom Ai about Canadian immigration but Rat Boy thinks he knows best...
Errr… no, we have no black people, Asians or Middle Eastern people here at all.
We had a Moroccan once, I believe, but we managed to catapult him back to Morocco.
You enormous imbecile.
Public opinion polls show that nearly half of Canadians believe Canada has been taking in too many immigrants, driven largely by concerns over housing affordability, healthcare, and infrastructure strain.
Public Sentiment and Polls
• The Numbers: Recent tracking surveys by Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) and organizations like the Environics Institute indicate that roughly 47% to 54% of Canadians feel immigration levels are too high, a sharp increase compared to figures prior to the post-2020 acceleration.
• The Drivers: Two-thirds of negative or cautious views stem from pressures on housing, healthcare capacity, and the cost of living rather than opposition to immigration conceptually.
• Economic Recognition: Even among those concerned about high numbers, roughly half to 60% of respondents continue to acknowledge that immigration remains vital for supporting economic growth and countering an aging population.
Policy Shifts
• Reduction Targets: In response to public pressure and infrastructure strains, the federal government adjusted its framework, introducing caps on temporary residents and lowering permanent resident intake targets to stabilize housing and social services.
• Political Debate: Bipartisan and cross-political consensus on high immigration levels has fractured, with political leaders debating harder caps and tighter management of temporary foreign worker and international student programs.
@PuzZuLz saidMaybe if you would actually do the work that these immigrants are doing, they wouldn’t be needed to “support your economic growth”.
From Ai about Canadian immigration but Rat Boy thinks he knows best...
Public opinion polls show that nearly half of Canadians believe Canada has been taking in too many immigrants, driven largely by concerns over housing affordability, healthcare, and infrastructure strain.
Public Sentiment and Polls
• The Numbers: Recent tracking surveys by Immigration, Refugees and ...[text shortened]... g harder caps and tighter management of temporary foreign worker and international student programs.
- Joined
- 18 Aug 26
- Moves
- 481
1 edit
@Great-King-Rat saidUnfortunately woke tards like you hire the immigrants instead of real Canadians.
Maybe if you would actually do the work that these immigrants are doing, they wouldn’t be needed to “support your economic growth”.
Because, you know, you are a virtuous crusader 🙄
More like a race traitor.
- Joined
- 18 Aug 26
- Moves
- 481
@Ghost-of-a-Duke saidNot anymore you don't.
If countries have variable importance and relevance, then so do individuals.
As an aside, Britain had a greater global impact for a longer stretch of time than the US.
Y'all too scared to be men.
Terrified of being called racist.
You personally might have some value to society but shavixmir does not.
He fled the UK remember? Do you know why?
@PuzZuLz saidYou don’t think there’s innovation in The Netherlands?
The usual stuff.
Innovation, job creation, kicking the piss out of extremists, killing dictators, etc
It used to be "the western world" but most y'all turned into pansies and weirdos who are self loathing whites that crave to be subjugated and woke.
Pathetic really.
You really know nothing of the outside world, do you?
Have you ever traveled?
@PuzZuLz saidWait, wasn’t it “them foreigners” that were hiring their “own kind”?
Unfortunately woke tards like you hire the immigrants instead of real Canadians.
Because, you know, you are a virtuous crusader 🙄
More like a race traitor.
Now it’s me?
Maybe if you weren’t so painfully lazy someone would hire you.
Or, you know, start your own business around your area of expertise. Meth or something.