Originally posted by abejnoodCowboy? What are you talking about Camel Jockey. I was in Iran and Egypt in the seventies when you were still swimming around in your Daddy's nutsack.
I've seen the real world much better than you have, cowboy. And don't you think that just maybe your prejudice and bias and snobbiness towards them might have something to do with why they hate you?
Originally posted by slimjimAnother proof of ignorance. Iran is actually more mountain than desert, the so called "Camel Jokey's(which is, by the way, way out of date, I only know about it because my dad told me about it) are Arabs, not Iranians. And the 70's was when America was still robbing Iran blind and being abusive, it doesn't mean anything.
Cowboy? What are you talking about Camel Jockey. I was in Iran and Egypt in the seventies when you were still swimming around in your Daddy's nutsack.
Has anyone considered this a possiblility:
The Americans/British found chem/bio weapons in Iraq and lied about that. The two countries now have some nice ready-made weapons to throw at anyone they please.
Of all the unbelievable stuff that has come out of this crap affair, the thing I find most difficult to believe is the suggestion that Saddam had absolutely no unconventional weapons whatsoever. That is amazing.
Originally posted by KalsenGets my rec, Kalsen.
Has anyone considered this a possiblility:
The Americans/British found chem/bio weapons in Iraq and lied about that. The two countries now have some nice ready-made weapons to throw at anyone they please.
Of all the unbelievable stuff that has come out of this crap affair, the thing I find most difficult to believe is the suggestion that Saddam had absolutely no unconventional weapons whatsoever. That is amazing.
Originally posted by abejnoodWe played a couple of games and chatted awhile back. I believe you were in a Science Fair competition at the time. Did you tell me that you lived in Tennessee? Or am I mistaken?
Another proof of ignorance. Iran is actually more mountain than desert, the so called "Camel Jokey's(which is, by the way, way out of date, I only know about it because my dad told me about it) are Arabs, not Iranians. And the 70's was when America was still robbing Iran blind and being abusive, it doesn't mean anything.
Originally posted by Delmer"However, unlike you, embarrassed to be British, I am not embarrassed to be American."
"I'm sure there are many people who are embarressed that I'm British, and equally I'm sure there are many who are embarressed that you are American."
However, unlike you, embarrassed to be British, I am not embarrassed to be American.
If anyone posting in this forum has any concrete, first-hand evidence as to whether Bush did or did not lie about Iraq then by all means let him post it.
Well done, good for you.
Originally posted by KalsenIt's a good point, one i had never thought of. Indeed it's plausible, however I can;t see them hiding the weapons, look at the flack they've had to take over not finding any. Now if they found some and hid the rest that'd be more sensible. Anyhoo, both the Brits and our US collegues have tonnes of weapons of these ilk anyway, the only benefit of stealing these weapons would be untracability, and why would two peace loving democracies like our want to do something like that??? Maybe we're just stealing them back though.
Has anyone considered this a possiblility:
The Americans/British found chem/bio weapons in Iraq and lied about that. The two countries now have some nice ready-made weapons to throw at anyone they please.
Of all the unbelievable stuff that has come out of this crap affair, the thing I find most difficult to believe is the suggestion that Saddam had absolutely no unconventional weapons whatsoever. That is amazing.
I guess if they want to prove whether SH had weapons or not is to look in our reciept books.
1 edit
Originally posted by KalsenYeah right; because the Americans/British cannot create chemical/biological weapons of their own?
Has anyone considered this a possiblility:
The Americans/British found chem/bio weapons in Iraq and lied about that. The two countries now have some nice ready-made weapons to throw at anyone they please.
Of all the unbelievable stuff that has come out of this crap affair, the thing I find most difficult to believe is the suggestion that Saddam had absolutely no unconventional weapons whatsoever. That is amazing.
[HINT - who supplied Saddam with the chemical weapons he used on the Kurds and Iranians?]
Originally posted by scottishinnzActually its the opposite, Global warming DECREASES extreme weather. I just got done studying weather in college.
2) Bush probably did not cause Katerina to hit N/O. On the othe other hand he won't ratify the Kyoto accord, and global warming has been linked with an increase in extreme weather.
Originally posted by flyUnityAnd I'm a scientist. Whilst I am actually a plant biochemist, a number of my collegues work on climate modelling. I think you'll find that I'm right on this one. If you'd like me to go into specific details about the how and why then I will, but this isn;t really the place.
Actually its the opposite, Global warming DECREASES extreme weather. I just got done studying weather in college.
Originally posted by howardgeeNot bagging SlimDim (Slimjim?) cos i don't know him, but yes, i agree with Howardgee's point - the diffrence between whether he actively knew it was a lie or not is, perhaps, important.
Did Bush Lie?
The simple answer which all the evidence (or lack of evidence) points to is 'YES'.
The interesting question is "Did Bush Knowingly Lie?".
Since he has fewer brain cells than our own SlimDim, it is improbable that Bush has ever 'Knowingly' done anything.