@metal-brain saidWe're talking in circles.
Nope. You need to read that article, especially the part that says "Miller Changes His Story in Congressional Testimony". DUH!
You forgot that fact checkers are the biggest liars out there and they duped you again. Download the timeline from this website:
"Liberal “fact-checkers” like The Washington Post and PolitiFact argued the claim about National Guard assistance ...[text shortened]... e-timeline-shows-january-donald?fbclid=IwAR2Jy-GWfLwz_oiYJyPv2KYRCfHPjdq8xG1HsuMOUsxqGhxcpNYnXvmYEcM
It has already been established that:
A) Trump did not authorize 10,000 troops to be sent to the Capitol before or during January 6th ( though he had legal authority to do so); and
B) Nancy Pelosi didn't and had no legal authority to prevent them from being so deployed.
Thus, the answer to the OP's question is that Trump lied about this.
Enough time wasted; that DoD discussed possible deployments with local officials does not alter those facts.
@no1marauder saidNope. You need to read that article, especially the part that says "Miller Changes His Story in Congressional Testimony". DUH!
We're talking in circles.
It has already been established that:
A) Trump did not authorize 10,000 troops to be sent to the Capitol before or during January 6th ( though he had legal authority to do so); and
B) Nancy Pelosi didn't and had no legal authority to prevent them from being so deployed.
Thus, the answer to the OP's question is that Trump lied about t ...[text shortened]... ime wasted; that DoD discussed possible deployments with local officials does not alter those facts.
You forgot that fact checkers are the biggest liars out there and they duped you again. Download the timeline from this website:
"Liberal “fact-checkers” like The Washington Post and PolitiFact argued the claim about National Guard assistance coming from Meadows and other top Trump administration officials was false, but an official timeline of the events leading up to Jan. 6 apparently shows differently.
According to the timeline, a DOD official reached out to Capitol Police Deputy Chief Sean Gallagher four days before the attack on the U.S. Capitol to inquire about whether Capitol Police anticipated they would request National Guard troops be deployed to prepare for Jan. 6."
https://mynbc15.com/news/nation-world/[WORD TOO LONG]
Download the timeline from the link above. You are wrong. Trump did authorize NG deployment and Capitol Police Deputy Chief Sean Gallagher declined them. Sund blamed Pelosi, but the article above says it was McConnell. If you had looked at the timeline you would know you were lied to. You sought a confirmation bias so you got the lies. Trump authorized NG prior to Jan. 6 and Capitol Police Deputy Chief Sean Gallagher declined and so did Washington, D.C., Mayor Muriel Bowser.
Now........... did Sund lie when he blamed Pelosi?
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2023/sep/19/former-capitol-police-chief-blames-nancy-pelosi-ja/
@no1marauder saidWe're talking in circles because you refuse to download the timeline that proves you wrong!
We're talking in circles.
It has already been established that:
A) Trump did not authorize 10,000 troops to be sent to the Capitol before or during January 6th ( though he had legal authority to do so); and
B) Nancy Pelosi didn't and had no legal authority to prevent them from being so deployed.
Thus, the answer to the OP's question is that Trump lied about t ...[text shortened]... ime wasted; that DoD discussed possible deployments with local officials does not alter those facts.
https://mynbc15.com/news/nation-world/[WORD TOO LONG]
@metal-brain saidHere's the actual timeline the article referenced: https://justthenews.com/sites/default/files/2022-06/USCPJan.6Timeline.pdf
We're talking in circles because you refuse to download the timeline that proves you wrong!
https://mynbc15.com/news/nation-world/[WORD TOO LONG]
Show me where it says: President Trump authorizes/orders 10,000 National Guard to be deployed on January 6th; and
Nancy Pelosi vetoes that order.
Unless you can (and you can't), Trump is lying.
1 edit
@no1marauder saidTry reading it instead of avoiding the evidence like the plague. It is all there.
Here's the actual timeline the article referenced: https://justthenews.com/sites/default/files/2022-06/USCPJan.6Timeline.pdf
Show me where it says: President Trump authorizes/orders 10,000 National Guard to be deployed on January 6th; and
Nancy Pelosi vetoes that order.
Unless you can (and you can't), Trump is lying.
Did Sund lie when he blamed Pelosi? Did Pelosi call Sund a liar for blaming her?
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2023/sep/19/former-capitol-police-chief-blames-nancy-pelosi-ja/
@metal-brain saidJust show me on the timeline where it says what I asked you. If it doesn't (and it doesn't), Trump is lying.
Try reading it instead of avoiding the evidence like the plague. It is all there.
@no1marauder saidIt is a PDF download. Find it yourself or accept a bet on it. You know how to read. I am not going to read it all over again to find what I already know is there. You are a liar. You never read it to know what it says.
Just show me on the timeline where it says what I asked you. If it doesn't (and it doesn't), Trump is lying.
@no1marauder
Did Sund lie when he blamed Pelosi? Did Pelosi call Sund a liar for blaming her? Why hasn't anybody investigated that?
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2023/sep/19/former-capitol-police-chief-blames-nancy-pelosi-ja/
@metal-brain saidGive me a page number where it says "Trump authorizes 10,000 National Guard to be deployed but Nancy Pelosi stops them from being sent to the Capitol". That is what is needed to support your claim in the OP.
It is a PDF download. Find it yourself or accept a bet on it. You know how to read. I am not going to read it all over again to find what I already know is there. You are a liar. You never read it to know what it says.
HINT: It ain't there.
1 edit
@no1marauder saidWill you bet on it? I need motivation. If you are going to say it ain't there risk your reputation if you are not full of crap. The usual terms. End of month deadline.
Give me a page number where it says "Trump authorizes 10,000 National Guard to be deployed but Nancy Pelosi stops them from being sent to the Capitol". That is what is needed to support your claim in the OP.
HINT: It ain't there.
Did Sund lie when he blamed Pelosi? Did Pelosi call Sund a liar for blaming her? Why hasn't anybody investigated that? What was McConnell's role in it? Why don't you know if this is important?
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2023/sep/19/former-capitol-police-chief-blames-nancy-pelosi-ja/
@metal-brain saidStop with this bet BS. I have no intention of wagering with someone who wants to be the sole judge of who wins the "bet". You must be an idiot to keep bringing this up.
Will you bet on it? I need motivation. If you are going to say it ain't there risk your reputation if you are not full of crap. The usual terms. End of month deadline.
Did Sund lie when he blamed Pelosi? Did Pelosi call Sund a liar for blaming her? Why hasn't anybody investigated that? What was McConnell's role in it? Why don't you know if this is important?
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2023/sep/19/former-capitol-police-chief-blames-nancy-pelosi-ja/
Sund never says A) Trump authorized 10,000 National Guard troops or B) That Nancy Pelosi vetoed their deployment, so he's no help to the claims Trump has made. At best, relying on double hearsay, he says Pelosi didn't want National Guard troops there but that doesn't prove anything - she had no authority to decline them if Trump ordered them there (which he didn't).
@no1marauder saidStop it with this BS.
Stop with this bet BS. I have no intention of wagering with someone who wants to be the sole judge of who wins the "bet". You must be an idiot to keep bringing this up.
Sund never says A) Trump authorized 10,000 National Guard troops or B) That Nancy Pelosi vetoed their deployment, so he's no help to the claims Trump has made. At best, relying on double hearsay, he sa ...[text shortened]... prove anything - she had no authority to decline them if Trump ordered them there (which he didn't).
Trump cannot order the NG there and you know it. All he can do is authorize their deployment for someone to accept and they rejected them instead. You are full of crap. Trump did authorize them and you lying all day long will not change that.
You wont accept the bet because you are a liar. Read the first sentence of this link and tell me what it says:
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/532739-bowser-to-doj-pentagon-dc-isnt-requesting-federal-law-enforcement-to/
@no1marauder saidCapitol Police Deputy Chief Sean Gallagher declined the offer of NG troops authorized by the DOD. Do you dispute this fact?
Stop with this bet BS. I have no intention of wagering with someone who wants to be the sole judge of who wins the "bet". You must be an idiot to keep bringing this up.
Sund never says A) Trump authorized 10,000 National Guard troops or B) That Nancy Pelosi vetoed their deployment, so he's no help to the claims Trump has made. At best, relying on double hearsay, he sa ...[text shortened]... prove anything - she had no authority to decline them if Trump ordered them there (which he didn't).
@metal-brain saidSo "Wikipedia is Grabage"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dblXf0RGuMc
Maybe, but most probably all the information on official business is most likely correct...
@no1marauder said“Carol Corbin (DOD) texts USCP Deputy Chief Sean Gallagher, Protective Service Bureau, to determine whether USCP is considering a request for National Guard soldiers for January 6, 2021 event,” the timeline reads in an entry listed for Saturday, Jan. 2, 2021.
Stop with this bet BS. I have no intention of wagering with someone who wants to be the sole judge of who wins the "bet". You must be an idiot to keep bringing this up.
Sund never says A) Trump authorized 10,000 National Guard troops or B) That Nancy Pelosi vetoed their deployment, so he's no help to the claims Trump has made. At best, relying on double hearsay, he sa ...[text shortened]... prove anything - she had no authority to decline them if Trump ordered them there (which he didn't).
The next morning, the timeline indicates, “Gallagher replies to DOD via text that a request for National Guard support not forthcoming at this time after consultation with COP Sund.”
However, that initial rejection from Capitol Police came as they were beginning to change their assessment of the potential threats of violence.
https://mynbc15.com/news/nation-world/[WORD TOO LONG]