- Joined
- 09 Jan 22
- Moves
- 1139
@Mott-The-Hoople saidI'm wondering WTF they were voting for in the 7th century anyway in that part of the world? (Or anywhere else for that matter)
And it’s been down hill ever since 😉
NOBODY was voting for jack s.h.it back then.
Just some jerk trying to excuse Islam and it's insane human rights violations by claiming it was somehow ahead of it's time in treatment of women.
.
@Earl-of-Trumps saidFeminism is on the decline. There are women in their 60s now who started off hot and sweaty supporting this movement in their 20s, only to realise that now all they have is a cat and a string of failed relationships. The guys they dumped are marrying real women from the far east.
Between this proposal (men vote, not women) and transmen competing in women's athletic events,
the silence by women in their own defence is deafening. Maybe the women's movement is on the wane.
Strange times.
@Cliff-Mashburn saidYeah .. you can vote but if you are unfaithful to your husband, we cut off your head.
I'm wondering WTF they were voting for in the 7th century anyway in that part of the world? (Or anywhere else for that matter)
NOBODY was voting for jack s.h.it back then.
Just some jerk trying to excuse Islam and it's insane human rights violations by claiming it was somehow ahead of it's time in treatment of women.
.
@Earl-of-Trumps saidReally? That's your takeaway?
Between this proposal (men vote, not women) and transmen competing in women's athletic events,
the silence by women in their own defence is deafening. Maybe the women's movement is on the wane.
Strange times.
Not that there really is no problem, there are no men in women's sports, but that women don't care about something that men, desperate to show they care about some women's issue, make into a huge deal.
2 edits
@Rajk999 saidOMG, I am so glad this isn't a typical male's take on this. (Maybe it is on the right.)
Feminism is on the decline. There are women in their 60s now who started off hot and sweaty supporting this movement in their 20s, only to realise that now all they have is a cat and a string of failed relationships. The guys they dumped are marrying real women from the far east.
Because that's just stupid.
Women don't give a damn about who the men they dumped are seeing now. The men are invariably the losers in that deal (and very likely, so are the women they are seeing now), and if women did care about it, they'd still be with them. Men are such big babies about it. What I find funny is that all the incels think they'll get lucky if they go to Asia "because the women there are submissive". Hahaha, good luck with that. If you're an ass, you'll still be an ass in Asia.
"A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle." -- Irina Dunn, 1970
@moonbus saidI must confess the Russians are better technically than I am. I struggle with trying to play Rachmaninoff and Tchaikovsky. But I concur, the Rachmaninoff No. 2 is a great piece.
5. I stand corrected. 😉
Musta confused it with Rachmaninov's 2d. Richter .... another favorite.
Interestingly, Rachmaninoff's Piano Concerto No. 2 is in C minor, just like Beethoven's Piano Concerto No. 3. C minor is not very common in piano works at all, at least in my experience.
@Cliff-Mashburn saidWell, let's see. I frankly do not believe anything Trumpublicans write here, they lie as fanatically as their Dear Leader.
Do you believe everything someone says here?
I do not know of anyone else here with a reason to lie THAT much.
@Rajk999 saidThese “real women from the East” you refer to… you mean poor women who will marry fat Western incels to get out of poverty?
Feminism is on the decline. There are women in their 60s now who started off hot and sweaty supporting this movement in their 20s, only to realise that now all they have is a cat and a string of failed relationships. The guys they dumped are marrying real women from the far east.
Jesus. Where are the real men?
You know, the one’s who don’t whine about their relationship ending, who don’t blame women for their own woes, who take responsibility for their actions and don’t mail order brides?
@Suzianne saidFor all but the last 50 of the previous 800,000 years of human evolution, a woman needed a man to get her most basic needs met: food, shelter, security. This meant that many women had to submit to troglodytes, just to eat regular. Only troglodytes thought this was a sensible arrangement.
OMG, I am so glad this isn't a typical male's take on this. (Maybe it is on the right.)
Because that's just stupid.
Women don't give a damn about who the men they dumped are seeing now. The men are invariably the losers in that deal (and very likely, so are the women they are seeing now), and if women did care about it, they'd still be with them. Men are such big bab ...[text shortened]... still be an ass in Asia.
"A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle." -- Irina Dunn, 1970
This changed in No. America and Western Europe in just one generation. Now, in America and Western Europe, a woman can a have man, or several, if she wants, and she does not have to settle for troglodytes. Only troglodytes think this is not a sensible arrangement.
Not everyone is adapting to the new roles well. There are some women who pine for the previous roles, because they were simple and clear, and there are men who feel disoriented and emasculated by the new roles women can take. Hegseth is obviously one of them; he thinks women should not have command positions in the military, and probably can't get his mind round the thought of a female president, much less one of color. "Tradwife" is the current term for the traditional sort of wife who stays home in the kitchen and raises the kids while her Oath Taker or the Proud Boy goes to work. Unless his name rhymes with Gomez or Hernandez or he is a construction worker in Trump's reactionary Amerika, in which case he'd better keep out of sight these days.
@moonbus said
For all but the last 50 of the previous 800,000 years of human evolution, a woman needed a man to get her most basic needs met: food, shelter, security. This meant that many women had to submit to troglodytes, just to eat regular. Only troglodytes thought this was a sensible arrangement.
This changed in No. America and Western Europe in just one generation. Now, in America ...[text shortened]... ction worker in Trump's reactionary Amerika, in which case he'd better keep out of sight these days.
For all but the last 50 of the previous 800,000 years of human evolution, a woman needed a man to get her most basic needs met
I don't think that was true before about 10,000 years ago.
@AThousandYoung saidOnly on the island of Lesbos! 😆For all but the last 50 of the previous 800,000 years of human evolution, a woman needed a man to get her most basic needs met
I don't think that was true before about 10,000 years ago.
@shavixmir saidThe very few I've run into are already married.
These “real women from the East” you refer to… you mean poor women who will marry fat Western incels to get out of poverty?
Jesus. Where are the real men?
You know, the one’s who don’t whine about their relationship ending, who don’t blame women for their own woes, who take responsibility for their actions and don’t mail order brides?
Women snap them up like Crocs on sale.
@Ghost-of-a-Duke saidIn the Law of Moses yes, not in Christianity. Big difference. That has not been practiced by any civilized society. Only in Islam is it currently practiced.
In the Bible it was just being stoned to death, hey?