1 edit
@metal-brain saidBelow is a link to the U.S. Cybersecurity Agency web site, their statement regarding the Nov. 3d election:
No, that is not true. There was no investigation.
Are you making that up?
https://www.cisa.gov/news/2020/11/12/joint-statement-elections-infrastructure-government-coordinating-council-election
(A statement for which Krebs paid with his job, I might add.)
Below is a link to the State of Georgia Election Commission's statement on its "audit" of election results and categorical rejection of fraud claims:
https://sos.ga.gov/index.php/elections/3rd_strike_against_voter_fraud_claims_means_theyre_out_after_signature_audit_finds_no_fraud
Do your own homework for the other 49 states.
On another note, please see the following FBI site:
https://www.fbi.gov/scams-and-safety/common-scams-and-crimes/election-crimes-and-security
which specifies that the following is illegal:
"Fraud by an Elections/Campaign Official or Other Individual:
Changing a ballot tally or engaging in other corrupt behavior as an elections official."
Changing a ballot tally is exactly what Trump demanded that Raffensperger do to "find" 11,780 votes, or "re-calculate" the total, in GA.
@earl-of-trumps saidI'll say one thing for Trump: never a dull moment. I stayed up watching live feeds and didn't get to bed until well after 2 a.m. (Zurich time). FaceTimed with my mom (who lives within DC metro-area) to make sure she stayed indoors. At 90 (a card-carrying Sierra-club tree-hugger), she shouldn't be blowing raspberries at militias any more. 😉
Swishing those political taste buds around.... awesome
A little civil insurrection never hurt anyone. Beats the crap out of watching Democrats beat up Walmart
Mike Pence and Congress are to be congratulated for completing the job on the date specified under extraordinary circumstances.
2 edits
@shavixmir saidIt's perfectly plain English, shav.
“ a group of multiple individuals...”
This is the official description on the shooting of that woman entering the building.
It’s probably the most fascinating thing I’ve read all night.
It means the "group of multiple individuals" consisted of several schizophrenics, each of whom had multiple personalities and/or a Siamese twin.
@moonbus saidThose are NOT investigations.
Below is a link to the U.S. Cybersecurity Agency web site, their statement regarding the Nov. 3d election:
https://www.cisa.gov/news/2020/11/12/joint-statement-elections-infrastructure-government-coordinating-council-election
(A statement for which Krebs paid with his job, I might add.)
Below is a link to the State of Georgia Election Commission's statement on its ...[text shortened]... hat Trump demanded that Raffensperger do to "find" 11,780 votes, or "re-calculate" the total, in GA.
@metal-brain saidOf course not. Those are reports of the results of investigations.
Those are NOT investigations.
@metal-brain saidGA performed an audit, which is not simply a recount. What more do you want? Mueller II ? You did not accept Mueller I, so why would you (or Trump, for that matter) accept Mueller II ?
No, those are reports on the recount.
@moonbus saidNot an investigation. All recounts require a report on that recount. That is NOT an investigation into voter fraud.
GA performed an audit, which is not simply a recount. What more do you want? Mueller II ? You did not accept Mueller I, so why would you (or Trump, for that matter) accept Mueller II ?
@metal-brain saidGive up already.
Not an investigation. All recounts require a report on that recount. That is NOT an investigation into voter fraud.
The top republicans, the voter boards, the courts and international observers have all stated there was no voter fraud, no intentional discarding of votes and nothing untowards that could have swayed the election.
Your orange rimmster lost.
You’ve lost both houses.
And you have lost this argument. Multiple times. Nobody believes you. All you do is desperately troll.
Nobody likes you even.
You’re like a pus-leaking wart on the end of a penis: slimey, unwanted and oozing the faint stench of loser.
@shavixmir saidThat is false!
Give up already.
The top republicans, the voter boards, the courts and international observers have all stated there was no voter fraud, no intentional discarding of votes and nothing untowards that could have swayed the election.
Your orange rimmster lost.
You’ve lost both houses.
And you have lost this argument. Multiple times. Nobody believes you. All you do is des ...[text shortened]... ike a pus-leaking wart on the end of a penis: slimey, unwanted and oozing the faint stench of loser.
None of them claimed there was "no voter fraud". There is always election fraud to some extent. Even if you could prove one of them said that it is obviously not true.
You seem to have difficulty with the truth. Keep working on that.
@metal-brain saidBefore you can investigate you have to something to investigate. If it was possible to prove a negative we could probably answer some really big questions like, do god or gods exist but we cannot. So all that is possible is the debunking or verification of evidence in support of wide spread voter fraud, unfortunately there is no evidence to debunk or verify.
Not an investigation. All recounts require a report on that recount. That is NOT an investigation into voter fraud.
2 edits
-Removed-**In my opinion**, Donald Trump is no more personably responsible for violent reactions to the political situation than Roosevelt was responsible for American reaction to our being militarily attacked and our subsequent involvement in WWII
Sometimes people simply agree about wrongfulness, and yes, of course Trump is one of them.