@Sleepyguy saidWell I reread it and you're partially correct though it is limited to whatever Particulary Sensitive Sectors or Activities that pose a threat to national security or public order means. A pertinent question might be who's national security or public order.
What does "in Greenland" mean to you?
--
Given the threat to national security and public order posed by increased efforts by adversaries to expand influence and control in Greenland, the Parties agree that states or investors from a state that is not a member of NATO, a NATO partner, or an EU member state shall not be allowed to have (i) control, (ii) significan ...[text shortened]... of such states or investors would not constitute a threat to national security or public order.
--
@no1marauder saidYou're quibbling. Golden Dome is there in the preamble, "Activities" is explicitly defined to include the extraction of resources, in Greenland. I'm moving on.
Well I reread it and you're partially correct though it is limited to whatever Particulary Sensitive Sectors or Activities that pose a threat to national security or public order means. A pertinent question might be who's national security or public order.
@Sleepyguy saidIf you insist that's up to you.
You're quibbling. Golden Dome is there in the preamble, "Activities" is explicitly defined to include the extraction of resources, in Greenland. I'm moving on.
All I'm saying is that your categorical assertions are not supported by the actual text which leaves plenty of wiggle room.
@Sleepyguy saidLower “crime” rates
I wish Trump wasn't an uncouth braggart and a-hole. But I am in support of a missile defense system to protect North America. I also like secure borders, illegal aliens deported, taking on cartels, the return to the Monroe doctrine, lower crime rates, Iran not having nukes, and attempts to bring manufacturing back the US. He gets things done, or tries to.
Fraud has skyrocketed but you don’t consider that crime do you?
@shavixmir saidHHahahaha This one wants to go back to whatever something we read a long time ago and discuss it
Dude, dude, dude…
Really? That’s what you seriously think?
You think trump got something?
Damn. Read the original deal and then read this one… tell us what he got. Go on.
I dare you.
Losers simply do not understand, they just don’t, the material that goes into negotiations and the constant adjusting and jousting, give, take, wink, nod. If they were not jousting , there would be no negotiation. I am sorry you wrote this, I think people are reading it.. downer๐๐๐
@AThousandYoung saidFraud is crime, obviously. Violent crime, property crime etc. are down, fraud is up, probably driven by scammers new AI tools. What's your point?
Lower “crime” rates
Fraud has skyrocketed but you don’t consider that crime do you?
@no1marauder saidSpoken like a blood sucking lawyer.
If you insist that's up to you.
All I'm saying is that your categorical assertions are not supported by the actual text which leaves plenty of wiggle room.
6 edits
@Sleepyguy saidJust irritated by our criminal President getting credit for bringing crime down with his illegal methods
Fraud is crime, obviously. Violent crime, property crime etc. are down, fraud is up, probably driven by scammers new AI tools. What's your point?
It's being driven by the fact that we don't punish people for committing fraud because "everybody does it" and that makes it ok e.g. KellyJay argues this
Are people who are pardoned removed from the "criminals" list?
Can't trust the damn AI I keep telling you
Google AI prompt:
"has crime gone down"
Response:
"Yes, crime rates in the United States have dropped significantly following a spike during the COVID-19 pandemic. According to FBI Data released on reported crimes, the U.S. saw historic, double-digit declines in violent crime, marking the largest year-over-year drop in decades"
Google AI prompt:
"has crime gone down if you take into account fraud"
Response:
"No, overall crime has not gone down when factoring in fraud. While traditional violent and property crimes tracked by local police have seen declines, digital and financial fraud have surged dramatically, with U.S. internet crime and scam losses climbing past $20 billion annually according to agencies like the FBI."
@Sleepyguy saidIs Greenland going to pay for it?
Oh you're going to make me read it?
Let's see, in the preamble it says:
--
Recognizing the Parties’ shared interest in allowing the United States to have military access to the territory of Greenland to the extent necessary to defend the North Atlantic Treaty area, Greenland, and the American continent, [b]including through establishment of a Golden Dome defe ...[text shortened]... of such states or investors would not constitute a threat to national security or public order."
--
@Sleepyguy saidI'm sure they were consulted though they remain preferable to the senile, bloodthirsty maniac "negotiating" for the US side by threats of invasion.
Spoken like a blood sucking lawyer.
@AverageJoe1 saidUhuh.
HHahahaha This one wants to go back to whatever something we read a long time ago and discuss it
Losers simply do not understand, they just don’t, the material that goes into negotiations and the constant adjusting and jousting, give, take, wink, nod. If they were not jousting , there would be no negotiation. I am sorry you wrote this, I think people are reading it.. downer๐๐๐
Dumb arse.
@Sleepyguy saidThe US already had permission to build military sites and olace as many soldiers as they want.
Dude, try Google.
Signed by all three parties, not just Denmark and the US but now Greenland as well.
New military sites.
Unrestricted free access to Greenland’s airspace and territorial waters.
Direct veto power over foreign investments in Greenland.
The U.S. long-term presence is secured by mandating that an independent Greenland must remain in NATO.
The US does not get veto rights on foreign investment.
What the hell are you reading?
@shavixmir saidAnd what the hell is NLands DOING??!!!!!?
The US already had permission to build military sites and olace as many soldiers as they want.
The US does not get veto rights on foreign investment.
What the hell are you reading?
Does NLands do anything? Do y’all just read the papers? USA SUCCEEDS AGAIN! TRUMP ENDS IRAN NUCLEAR THREAT! USA TROUNCES OTHER COUNTRIES WITH HUGE GAINS,! USA CONTINUES WITH INNOVATION USED GLOBALLY! NLANDS CAUGHT STARING IN AMAZEMENT AT USA!!
@AverageJoe1 saidYeah, but no...
And what the hell is NLands DOING??!!!!!?
Does NLands do anything? Do y’all just read the papers? USA SUCCEEDS AGAIN! TRUMP ENDS IRAN NUCLEAR THREAT! USA TROUNCES OTHER COUNTRIES WITH HUGE GAINS,! USA CONTINUES WITH INNOVATION USED GLOBALLY! NLANDS CAUGHT STARING IN AMAZEMENT AT USA!!
The Netherlands, like the rest of the planet, look at trump and see a moron squealing like a little piggy. A wanna-be dictator banning media, verbally abusing women and with such low self-esteem he wants to stick his name on everything, whilst, at the same time, starts wars, trade wars, etc. which only do Americans more harm than good and empty the reserves.
You and trump are a laughing stock.