Go back
greenland

greenland

Debates


@no1marauder said
The Preamble binds the parties to nothing and the only mention in the body possibly relevant merely provides for consultations if one party presents plans regarding military proposals beyond the text of the agreement. That doesn't seem to add anything.

You don't actually think Golden Dome will ever be built, do you?

The other paragraph talks about activities which ...[text shortened]... veto over any and all possible foreign investment in minerals in Greenland seems an absurd stretch.
I gather from this Marauder that he is actually unhappy that we have resolved a great agreement with Greenland, which mainly is about security for our country. And for our hemisphere. That is because he is a natural contrarian, this proves that which I’ve always said, and we can always be a little skeptical about any position he ever holds after this. We know we know full well that he enjoys having the Greenland agreement in our pocket..


@Mott-The-Hoople said
You do know there is a “procedure” for seeking asylum right?
Yes, and it is not being shot in the head by ICE agents.


@Soothfast said
I'm rather at a loss over what was achieved with Greenland, and even more at a loss as to the "strategy" for going about achieving it.

Greenland, as part of NATO, was already a no-go territory for Russian or Chinese military bases. Should Trump next secure an agreement with France that Russia or China won't build a base in the suburbs of Paris?

The US has had a milita ...[text shortened]... take Trump seriously except in his capacity as an agent of general chaos and global destabilization.
Denmark sold America its own shoes back. As always with Trump, it’s only posturing and preening, so he can claim a tremendous victory out of a nothing burger.


@AverageJoe1 said
Each side got what they wanted. Trump is a true genius. It was his plan from the beginning….. you ask for more, and you accept less. But less is what he wanted.
Told ‘ya
You can't even recognize sarcasm.


@AverageJoe1 said
I gather from this Marauder that he is actually unhappy that we have resolved a great agreement with Greenland, which mainly is about security for our country. And for our hemisphere. That is because he is a natural contrarian, this proves that which I’ve always said, and we can always be a little skeptical about any position he ever holds after this. We know we know full well that he enjoys having the Greenland agreement in our pocket..
He is a liar.

Full stop.


@Suzianne said
You can't even recognize sarcasm.
Not about me,, though,. We’ve discussed this before.