Homosexual Acts and the Categorical Imperative

Originally posted by bbarr
They are scattered throughout his writings.

Does this make them scatological?

Originally posted by lucifershammer
How would you do that?

The old argument: Bringing a person into life condemns them to death.

Originally posted by Bosse de Nage
The old argument: Bringing a person into life condemns them to death.

The imputations of God are the masterstroke of genius.

Originally posted by FreakyKBH
The imputations of God are [b]the masterstroke of genius.[/b]

"Death needs time for what it kills to grow in"

Originally posted by FreakyKBH
The imputations of God are [b]the masterstroke of genius.[/b]

Are we back to Kant's considerations about masturbation?

Originally posted by Bosse de Nage
"Death needs time for what it kills to grow in"

By imputing us with Adam's original sin, we are condemned first. With God's justice as our point of contact with Him (justice always condemns before blessing), God is able to save us eternally, not merely have a day-to-day relationship.

Originally posted by Palynka
Are we back to Kant's considerations about masturbation?

Cute, but not really funny.