Go back
ICE now jailing US citizens, 4 CHILDREN

ICE now jailing US citizens, 4 CHILDREN

Debates

1 edit

@Rajk999 said
Here is the truth
- the mother is not an American citizen
- she was in the US illegally
- She alone was deported.
- She decided to take the child with her.

The press got hold of the story and twisted it around because dramaqueen people like you, enjoy these kind of twisted rubbish stories. There are hundreds of babies that are American citizens and their parents ahve ...[text shortened]... ontinues to live and destroy life for others in America.

Something is wrong with people like you.
- She alone was deported.
- She decided to take the child with her.

More lies from the worthless trumptarded liars.

It is only a complete idiot who wants to see 'due process' for all these removals and deportations.
You're the worthless trumptarded idiot that wants a dictator; not here in America loser. We have due process here. You should try it in the country that you live in once.


@KingDavid403 said
- She alone was deported.
- She decided to take the child with her.

More lies from the worthless trumptarded liars.

It is only a complete idiot who wants to see 'due process' for all these removals and deportations.
You're the worthless trumptarded idiot that wants a dictator; not here in America loser. We have due process here. You should try it in the country that you live in once.
Look dude, you can lie to yourself all you want, your lying don’t fly here tho 😂

Is you got some extra plumbing?

That’s why you libs here support democrats isnt it?

1 edit

@Mott-The-Hoople said
Look dude, you can lie to yourself all you want, your lying don’t fly here tho 😂

Is you got some extra plumbing?

That’s why you libs here support democrats isnt it?
The only ones that are lying is you worthless to God trumptarded liars. Everything you and your ilk have been posting here about this child and mother is nothing but a lie. I've look into it all and you are 100% completely lying liar dudess.
btw, get bent punk. Your trump lies don't fly here loser boy. Bye bye loser... LOL...


@KingDavid403 said
- She alone was deported.
- She decided to take the child with her.

More lies from the worthless trumptarded liars.

It is only a complete idiot who wants to see 'due process' for all these removals and deportations.
You're the worthless trumptarded idiot that wants a dictator; not here in America loser. We have due process here. You should try it in the country that you live in once.
You people really are emotional nutcases... too much estrogen in your body.

Under Biden, there were around 400,000 deportations every year. This is more than Trump. ..
- did all these 400,000 get 'due process'? The answer is NO !!
- did this lack of 'due process' hit the headlines? NO!!

There were several cases where boatloads of Cubans landed in the Florida Keys, under Biden. These people were processed, given medical care, food etc and immediately deported ... there was no 'due process'. This is normal. It is only because it is under Trump, the fools and drama queens come out.

1 edit

@Rajk999 said
You people really are emotional nutcases... too much estrogen in your body.

Under Biden, there were around 400,000 deportations every year. This is more than Trump. ..
- did all these 400,000 get 'due process'? The answer is NO !!
- did this lack of 'due process' hit the headlines? NO!!

There were several cases where boatloads of Cubans landed in the Florid ...[text shortened]... ocess'. This is normal. It is only because it is under Trump, the fools and drama queens come out.
BS. Summary deportations are legal.to exclude those arriving and attempting to enter illegally but once an alien is in the country for any length of time, deportation is governed by standard due process rules. This has been confirmed by the SCOTUS for at least 120 years (citations proving these points are in another thread in response to Cliff).

EDIT: The thread is "SCOTUS broke the law ......"


@no1marauder said
BS. Summary deportations are legal.to exclude those arriving and attempting to enter illegally but once an alien is in the country for any length of time, deportation is governed by standard due process rules. This has been confirmed by the SCOTUS for at least 120 years (citations proving these points are in another thread in response to Cliff).

EDIT: The thread is "SCOTUS broke the law ......"
Nonsense. Under the US Constitution even these illegal 'boat people' are entitled to due process. Under all US presidents the Immigration Dept needs to act quickly otherwise these millions of immigrants will clog the courts with petty nonsense. Its only under Trump the press is creating unnecessary drame and Democrats are sucking it up.

Here is Perplexity AI on this matter:

People commonly referred to as "boat people"-immigrants or refugees arriving in the United States by sea, often without documentation-are entitled to due process protections under U.S. law.

Constitutional Basis
The U.S. Constitution guarantees due process rights to all "persons," not just citizens. This protection applies regardless of immigration status, meaning both documented and undocumented immigrants, including those who arrive by boat, are covered by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. The Supreme Court has consistently affirmed that non-citizens physically present in the U.S. are entitled to due process of law.

What Due Process Means for Immigrants
Due process generally includes:
The right to be notified of the government's actions against you (such as deportation).
The opportunity to be heard and to present a defense before an impartial decision-maker.

In the context of immigration, this typically means:
The right to a hearing before an immigration judge (except in certain expedited removal cases).
The right to be informed of the charges or reasons for removal.
The right to present evidence and arguments in one's defense.

Limits and Exceptions
While due process is guaranteed, the scope and procedures can vary:

Expedited Removal: Immigrants apprehended within 100 miles of the border and present in the country for less than two years may be subject to expedited removal, which does not require a hearing before a judge. However, asylum seekers must be given a chance to present their case before an immigration judge.

Civil vs. Criminal Proceedings: Most deportation proceedings are civil, not criminal. In civil immigration court, there is no automatic right to government-appointed counsel, though immigrants may hire their own attorney.

Border and Entry: Constitutional rights are somewhat limited at the border or ports of entry, but basic due process still applies.

Supreme Court and Legal Precedent
The Supreme Court has repeatedly affirmed that the Fifth Amendment's due process protections apply to all persons in the United States, including non-citizens in deportation proceedings. Justice Antonin Scalia wrote in a 1993 opinion: “It is well established that the Fifth Amendment entitles aliens to due process of law in deportation proceedings”.


@Rajk999 said
Nonsense. Under the US Constitution even these illegal 'boat people' are entitled to due process. Under all US presidents the Immigration Dept needs to act quickly otherwise these millions of immigrants will clog the courts with petty nonsense. Its only under Trump the press is creating unnecessary drame and Democrats are sucking it up.

Here is Perplexity AI on this mat ...[text shortened]... shed that the Fifth Amendment entitles aliens to due process of law in deportation proceedings”.[/i]
I'm aware of all that. But the SCOTUS has held those arriving are not held to the same standards. I gave the citations in the other thread.


@no1marauder said
I'm aware of all that. But the SCOTUS has held those arriving are not held to the same standards. I gave the citations in the other thread.
So its ok to violate the US Constitution when it suits your purpose. Did you not already condemn Trump for making decisions running contrary to the Constitution? Or is it that only the Supreme Court can do that?


@Rajk999 said
So its ok to violate the US Constitution when it suits your purpose. Did you not already condemn Trump for making decisions running contrary to the Constitution? Or is it that only the Supreme Court can do that?
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/19-161_g314.pdf

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.