If that woman ran over the ICE agent

@AverageJoe1 said
What if that were your wife coming home from the grocery store?
Maybe Suzanne can explain this analogy to you. She is very good with my analogies.

If you care to stab at it, talk like a human, not a bot. Appreciate that.
Tell us all the difference in that woman and someone’s wife coming home from a grocery store.

Your analogies are always idiotic.

@AverageJoe1 said
My my, you miss the element of intent. A professional protester trained in the art of what she did.
Intent city.

Professional protestor? Funny, that's exactly what Trump and Noem said, the two people with the least knowledge of what actually happened. Trump also said the shooter was "run over" with massive injuries, when he actually walked away without even a limp.

So are you a professional idiot, or just an amateur?

@Suzianne said
Your analogies are always idiotic.

Ha, I have been told that more than once. But in any event, I would not call this an analogy. It is a simple question, which is perfectly in line with this issue. Would you mind answering it for everybody?

@Mott-The-Hoople said
yeah lets just say it...because its the truth...dumbass its on video

the law does not allow a person to just hit a little bit when being lawfully detained...dumbass

Even if that statement was accurate (it isn't), it's irrelevant to the issue of use of deadly force.

@Mott-The-Hoople said
Wrong...I wouldnt be in the streets stopping law officers from doing their job

😂

@Mott-The-Hoople said
did the vehicle strike the officer?

You you CLEARY totally drank the kool aid and believe everything those LAIRS said, ALL of them lying, he did NOT get hurt and was standing near the CORNER of the car and he clearly moved out of the way so he was NOT hit by that car and it was COLD FKING BLOODED MURDER.

@AverageJoe1 said
Didn’t know that, it could change my mind. Having said that, what if it was your wife who just happened upon that scene coming home from the grocery store ….what would she have done, good feller.
Straight answer, please. No January 6, nor Epstein. Thank you.

Wait, did I not already ask this question… it’s OK. Someone else will answer it. Certainly wild grass or marauder. Don’t let them show you up!!!

I don't care about your hypotheticals the woman was MURDERED pure and simple and I have not heard a fking WORD of sympathy for the woman from ANY of you sociopathic Trumpite propagandists.

JUST LIKE THE VICTIMS OF EPSTEIN, not a WORD of sympathy for them either, a pattern is noticed here.

@sonhouse said
I don't care about your hypotheticals the woman was MURDERED pure and simple and I have not heard a fking WORD of sympathy for the woman from ANY of you sociopathic Trumpite propagandists.

JUST LIKE THE VICTIMS OF EPSTEIN, not a WORD of sympathy for them either, a pattern is noticed here.

Why are you not answering this simple question. if we were on stage in debate, the judges would relish such a question and the ensuing answer. We are just batting things around. My wife would have said, 'My goodness, what could this be? I hope no one was hurt. What am I to do? All those emergency lights blinking...."
Could you not agree that that is how all of the population might react? Do you disagree? My daughter, maybe your daughter, might react the same way.
Please consider a response. Ask me a question. No one ever does, except redundant platitudes., or tropes, or cliches.
She turns the corner to home, heads down the street, and sees commotion.

@sonhouse said
You you CLEARY totally drank the kool aid and believe everything those LAIRS said, ALL of them lying, he did NOT get hurt and was standing near the CORNER of the car and he clearly moved out of the way so he was NOT hit by that car and it was COLD FKING BLOODED MURDER.

You are an idiot. All that screaming and obscenities, like a madman. New footage just released from the body cams of the officers show exactly what happened, and all the audio is clear. The woman was told several times to stop and exit the vehicle. She proceeded to drive right into one of the officers. Death comes to fools very easily. There is no court except the "court of social media ICE haters", who will support this idiotic woman.

@Rajk999 said
You are an idiot. All that screaming and obscenities, like a madman. New footage just released from the body cams of the officers show exactly what happened, and all the audio is clear. The woman was told several times to stop and exit the vehicle. She proceeded to drive right into one of the officers. Death comes to fools very easily. There is no court except the "court of social media ICE haters", who will support this idiotic woman.

Rajk: She proceeded to drive right into one of the officers

An obvious lie as anyone who has watched the videos knows. Not obeying questionably legal commands from law enforcement agents is not a justification for execution in this country.

@Fzek47 said
@Cliff-Mashburn
Three points. First, he should have followed his training which teaches law enforcement personnel to NOT stand in front on a vehicle, to remain side-on. Second, he walked away and down the street no worse for wear, no limp, no physical distress. Any contact was minimal so it's hard to justify firing shots. Third, a human being was killed by a bullet in the hea ...[text shortened]... nt put a bullet in his mom's head in the name of making their community safer. Make that make sense.

One more point:
Don't shove your foot on the gas pedal and try to run over a law enforcement officer standing in front of you and no harm will come to you.

@Cliff-Mashburn said
One more point:
Don't shove your foot on the gas pedal and try to run over a law enforcement officer standing in front of you and no harm will come to you.

Gee, that must have been a pretty heavy gas pedal since she was going about 2 MPH when the lunatic started shooting.

@sh76 said
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-iIzR9nmQMM&t=49s

Okay, I've slowed down the video and gone frame by frame.

1. Until the shooting, as far as I can tell, the police did everything right. The car was blocking traffic and had to be removed.

2. Moving the car in reverse while the officer was holding on the the car is a hostile and threatening maneuver. I think we can all ag ...[text shortened]... was justified in believing that he needed to shoot to defend himself or others from lethal violence.

"Everything right"? Are you kidding? How about "Please move this vehicle" instead of "Get out of the f****ing car"?

I don't see 3 at all. And the car was going too slowly to pose any threat to Ross; he could and did easily avoid it as DOJ policy says too rather than use deadly force.

And Ross fired within a second of pulling his gun with no warning whatsoever. That's malicious and completely unreasonable.

@no1marauder said
Gee, that must have been a pretty heavy gas pedal since she was going about 2 MPH when the lunatic started shooting.

You know what acceleration means, right?