@wildgrass saidThe FDA is a government organization and so is the NIH.
Government? These authors work for the Gates foundation.
Also, they call it a vaccine. Which you seem eager to deny.
Are those writings from the NIH accurate or not? You seem to want to dismiss lying from government health organizations to believe they are doing good, yet when they make statements that contradict your assertions you don't believe them.
Stop going into cognitive dissonance and resolve that contradiction honestly. Can government organizations be believed or not? Yes or no?
1 edit
@wildgrass saidThere are no long term studies of gene vaccines. You are comparing mRNA cancer treatment to the new gene vaccines. They are not the same thing. Stop being dishonest about that.
The ability of mRNA to stimulate potent and long lasting responses from our immune system has been known for 30 years. Its been through molecular testing, in vitro cell based studies, animal testing, optimization studies, safety studies, and clinical trials (for vaccines targeting other diseases). Its been routinely touted in the medical literature over the past decade as a ...[text shortened]... he papers on the subject. There are many reasons to trust the safety and efficacy of these vaccines.
"The ability of mRNA to stimulate potent and long lasting responses from our immune system has been known for 30 years."
mRNA gene therapy did not start out as vaccines. I doubt that statement is true, especially since adjuvants are in vaccines to provoke immune responses, including a patent pending from China using graphene oxide as an adjuvant for a covid vaccine.
What is your source of information?
@metal-brain saidNo that's not from the NIH.
The FDA is a government organization and so is the NIH.
Are those writings from the NIH accurate or not? You seem to want to dismiss lying from government health organizations to believe they are doing good, yet when they make statements that contradict your assertions you don't believe them.
Stop going into cognitive dissonance and resolve that contradiction honestly. Can government organizations be believed or not? Yes or no?
This seems to be an issue of semantics with you, and I'm willing to accept your definition of a gene vaccine. That's fine. But I also agree with the authors that gene vaccines are a type of vaccine.