Go back
Mandates, taking our freedom, are on the way.

Mandates, taking our freedom, are on the way.

Debates


@wildgrass said
Joe have you not been paying attention to this thread?

It's settled constitutional law for over 100 years. I'll repeat the quote again and again, directly from SCOTUS opinions. "... it is within the police power of a state to provide for compulsory vaccination.”

https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/current-constitutional-issues-related-to-vaccine-mandates
Today’s lawyers would overturn such foolishness. It’s discussed ad nauseum on news shows. Oops, I’m wrong, because libs are now in control.
So, everyone, it would follow that the lib/nazi govt of the year 2040 could just as easily restrict birthing more than one baby. Same principle, don’t you think.
Hell of it is, you govt dependents, down to the last one, are all OK with govt control.

Did anyone tell us yet why you don’t deny that you are dependent ? Does this mean you are?


@wildgrass said
Joe have you not been paying attention to this thread?

It's settled constitutional law for over 100 years. I'll repeat the quote again and again, directly from SCOTUS opinions. "... it is within the police power of a state to provide for compulsory vaccination.”

https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/current-constitutional-issues-related-to-vaccine-mandates
Note, that , like Marauder, you changed from power of Feds to “police power of a state”. Huh? Commonplace amongst lib debaters.


@averagejoe1 said
Today’s lawyers would overturn such foolishness. It’s discussed ad nauseum on news shows. Oops, I’m wrong, because libs are now in control.
So, everyone, it would follow that the lib/nazi govt of the year 2040 could just as easily restrict birthing more than one baby. Same principle, don’t you think.
Hell of it is, you govt dependents, down to the last one, ar ...[text shortened]...

Did anyone tell us yet why you don’t deny that you are dependent ? Does this mean you are?
The constitutionality of this can be accurately defined, currently. As in, it is within constitutional authority to mandate vaccines.

You are right, however. A change can be made, either by overturning this ancient SCOTUS decision or constitutional amendment ratification. Maybe some smart news show lawyer will figure it all out. Makes you wonder why they are blabbering on news shows and not lawyering eh?

Although that doesn't change the fact that our constitution, currently, grants governments with the authority to mandate vaccinations explicitly written in a US Supreme Court case decision, a decision that has held for over 100 years.

1 edit

The true pathetic fact is that nobody would have considered using the power of government to force an entire nation of individuals tho take a vaccine, especially an experimental vaccine, until now.

Notice one of the court cases said a state, not the federal government can mandate a vaccine, even though it was a city that was doing it.

Funny how liberals believe that the constitution gives the power of local governments to the federal.

Liberals reject the idea of a Republic where the federal government does not control the state and local governments.


@AverageJoe1
Wearing masks is helping other folks including yourself, of course you figure you are superman and will NEVER get C19 but the new delta variant is a killer, they found 1000X the viral load in throats of victims as opposed to the original C19.
But of course you would rather DIE than do anything like civic duty, right?


@Eladar
It is the JOB of feds to override the traitorous ways of the repubs trying to steal ALL the future elections and, BTW WHITE BOY, if you think blacks, browns and Asians will have a harder time voting now, you better actually read through the draconian laws passed by repub states. For instance, in Georgia they passed a law saying they can replace electors who show dems winning. Now it is legal in Georgia for those electors to be fired and new ones picked by repubs to keep power in repub hands FOREVER.

And you don't think that is traitorous?


@sonhouse said
@AverageJoe1
Wearing masks is helping other folks including yourself, of course you figure you are superman and will NEVER get C19 but the new delta variant is a killer, they found 1000X the viral load in throats of victims as opposed to the original C19.
But of course you would rather DIE than do anything like civic duty, right?
So this delta variant will kill at how much of a higher rate than the original covids?


@sonhouse said
@Eladar
It is the JOB of feds to override the traitorous ways of the repubs trying to steal ALL the future elections and, BTW WHITE BOY, if you think blacks, browns and Asians will have a harder time voting now, you better actually read through the draconian laws passed by repub states. For instance, in Georgia they passed a law saying they can replace electors who show de ...[text shortened]... es picked by repubs to keep power in repub hands FOREVER.

And you don't think that is traitorous?
Steal all future elections by requiring proof you are who you say you are when you vote?

If you say so, but that certain paints you in a bad light.


@sonhouse said
@AverageJoe1
Wearing masks is helping other folks including yourself, of course you figure you are superman and will NEVER get C19 but the new delta variant is a killer, they found 1000X the viral load in throats of victims as opposed to the original C19.
But of course you would rather DIE than do anything like civic duty, right?
That is another issue. We all do not want to spread virus.
The issue, though, can the feds step outside of the Constitution and rule Willy-Nilly , the next law being, like China, restricting number of children,.
You gotta admit, you will never ‘stop there’.


@sonhouse said
@Eladar
It is the JOB of feds to override the traitorous ways of the repubs trying to steal ALL the future elections and, BTW WHITE BOY, if you think blacks, browns and Asians will have a harder time voting now, you better actually read through the draconian laws passed by repub states. For instance, in Georgia they passed a law saying they can replace electors who show de ...[text shortened]... es picked by repubs to keep power in repub hands FOREVER.

And you don't think that is traitorous?
What is traitorous.? Requiring ID for impt moments in life?


@sonhouse said
@AverageJoe1
Wearing masks is helping other folks including yourself, of course you figure you are superman and will NEVER get C19 but the new delta variant is a killer, they found 1000X the viral load in throats of victims as opposed to the original C19.
But of course you would rather DIE than do anything like civic duty, right?
“Civic Duty”?

Don’t y’all call it “the Common Good” nowadays?.

1 edit

@eladar said
The true pathetic fact is that nobody would have considered using the power of government to force an entire nation of individuals tho take a vaccine, especially an experimental vaccine, until now.

Notice one of the court cases said a state, not the federal government can mandate a vaccine, even though it was a city that was doing it.

Funny how liberals believe that the ...[text shortened]... he idea of a Republic where the federal government does not control the state and local governments.
This is garbage. It was considered, over 100 years ago, and repeatedly since then. The morality and constitutionality is sound, not just in the US but across the world. You don't have to agree with it, but pretending compulsory vaccination didn't exist pre-COVID is next level garbage.


@averagejoe1 said
That is another issue. We all do not want to spread virus.
The issue, though, can the feds step outside of the Constitution and rule Willy-Nilly , the next law being, like China, restricting number of children,.
You gotta admit, you will never ‘stop there’.
Is the constitution more important than defeating the pandemic ?
I guess that is the question that gets to the heart of the matter.


@mghrn55 said
Is the constitution more important than defeating the pandemic ?
I guess that is the question that gets to the heart of the matter.
None of the public health measures being discussed (compulsory vaccine or mask wearing) violate the constitution, in the US and elsewhere. So this is a moot point.


The gene vaccines are not really vaccines. They are treatments. Mandating them would be like mandating HCQ or ivermectin. Giving them vaccine status was corrupt. Someone should go to prison for it.

Mandating treatments is not constitutional that I am aware of.