Go back
Megan Fox and Her Three Transexual Sons...

Megan Fox and Her Three Transexual Sons...

Debates

2 edits

@Suzianne said
I don't think I was talking to you.
It's okay. Sometimes I might chime in anyway on any thread sans invitation.

BTW, that post of yours comes across as somewhat controlling. Have you and Ghost been training in the same dojo?


@Arkturos said
The trotting out of "victim card" implies some kind of entitled and cruel mindset in some cases, and maybe some kind of projection from survivors of parental abuse or whatever.
I guess in some cases it’s possible? These things don’t define us as adults and at some point we have to step out and grow it’s not grade school anymore.


@Suzianne said
You go, Ironic Man!
Foolish words from a true fool.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@Arkturos said
You brutal Tanbo Novice, you -- If you believe that we are not on speaking terms, then perhaps one of your exercises for this season could be not responding to any of my posts, no matter how tempted.

P.S. -- I do understand that thinking at times can result in self-deceptions.
Hypocrite!


@Arkturos said
You brutal Tanbo Novice, you -- If you believe that we are not on speaking terms, then perhaps one of your exercises for this season could be not responding to any of my posts, no matter how tempted.

P.S. -- I do understand that thinking at times can result in self-deceptions.
OCD +

Vote Up
Vote Down

@mike69 said
I guess in some cases it’s possible? These things don’t define us as adults and at some point we have to step out and grow it’s not grade school anymore.
Go, go, Ironic Man!


@Suzianne said
Statement 2 seems negated by statement 1.

Yes, I think it's sad when you use your children for benefit and acceptance.

That's not what she's doing though. It is, however, what you are doing right here.

That's called hypocrisy.
Your stupidity comes from bias and a lack of knowledge. Goodnight.


@Suzianne said
Hypocrite!
I don't have the stats at hand, but I do remember a recent passage when I would just ignore dozens of your posts but you seemed to reply to every one of mine.

TBH, your fascination with me is starting to feel kind of creepy, and it's not as if I'm a public figure, an "influencer", or some kind of "idol" in the entertainment domain.

Hoping this doesn't turn into some kind of "Play Misty For Me" scenario.


On a side-topic, I do wonder why Suzianne and Mike and maybe some others can get away with personal attacks and feel so free to offer them, despite the forum guidelines and T&C for the site.


@Arkturos said
I don't have the stats at hand, but I do remember a recent passage when I would just ignore dozens of your posts but you seemed to reply to every one of mine.

TBH, your fascination with me is starting to feel kind of creepy, and it's not as if I'm a public figure, an "influencer", or some kind of "idol" in the entertainment domain.

Hoping this doesn't turn into some kind of "Play Misty For Me" scenario.
I would suggest finding a new target for your harassment.

Someone who deserves it.

And stop PMing me. I have no idea what you thought an additional avenue of harassment was going to do for you.


@Suzianne said
I would suggest finding a new target for your harassment.

Someone who deserves it.

And stop PMing me. I have no idea what you thought an additional avenue of harassment was going to do for you.
Well, in response to your post -- although of course it would be incorrect for me to share anything you had written in private -- I'll share my recent DMs to you and let everyone else judge whether that was harassment.


Me to Suzianne by DM almost three days ago:

Hello.

Sorry to bother you, but you seem like the best person to ask. What would you say was the difference that keeps getting me banned when compared to your forum behavior or Dive 1.0's former behavior?

I hope it's not just forum- or site-seniority, but even if that is the case, that would be good to know.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Me to Suzianne by DM about a day and a half ago:

Hey again, and not sorry to bother you this time.

Yes, I remember when we had polite private conversations.

I really did not understand why you turned against me, presumably for not having exactly the same views as you or for making the wrong jokes while still sharing the same views, or something.

And as for your comments about thinking I had changed and was not the same as I used to be -- some of us do develop over time, it has emerged, and maybe it could also be said that mutual perceptions are inevitably partial, not to mention that sometimes any of us might connect the dots wrong.

I won't request an apology, an explanation, or your general thoughts on these topics, but I will at least leave you unblocked for a while.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@Cliff-Mashburn said
Child abuse is everybody's business.
Ah, so a boy who wears dresses at age 2 proves mom should go to jail.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@sonhouse said
Ah, so a boy who wears dresses at age 2 proves mom should go to jail.
I borrowed one of my late Mom's dresses so I could go trick-or-treating as a witch (I also had a gray wig and a black plastic pointy witch's hat to go with the outfit). That would have been in the late 1960s or early 70s.