More CDC data manipulation

More CDC data manipulation

Debates

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

w

Joined
20 Oct 06
Moves
9564
12 Jun 21

@metal-brain said
If you think you can prove the CDC does not manipulate data you are wrong.

https://www.npr.org/2020/06/29/884551391/florida-scientist-says-she-was-fired-for-not-manipulating-covid-19-data

https://www.theburningplatform.com/2021/05/20/how-the-cdc-is-manipulating-data-to-prop-up-vaccine-effectiveness/

https://foreignaffairsintelligencecouncil.wordpress.com/2021/03/ ...[text shortened]... ated-covid-numbers-accused-of-violating-federal-law-government-manipulation-revealed/comment-page-1/
None of these links answer my question. I could not even read the second one as my computer was bombarded with pop-ups and antivirus warnings.

Can you explain it? What data is misleading? The Blaze article I did read did not claim any manipulation by the CDC, only that the news outlets were misinterpreting the CDC data. This is very different.

Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
12 Jun 21
1 edit

@metal-brain said
If you think you can prove the CDC does not manipulate data you are wrong.

https://www.npr.org/2020/06/29/884551391/florida-scientist-says-she-was-fired-for-not-manipulating-covid-19-data

https://www.theburningplatform.com/2021/05/20/how-the-cdc-is-manipulating-data-to-prop-up-vaccine-effectiveness/

https://foreignaffairsintelligencecouncil.wordpress.com/2021/03/ ...[text shortened]... ated-covid-numbers-accused-of-violating-federal-law-government-manipulation-revealed/comment-page-1/
Do you even bother to read the articles you cite?

The first one accuses the Florida Department of Health, not the CDC, of manipulating data because the actual data would have been detrimental to the reopening plan!

The other two simply repeat crank conspiracy theories you have already presented on this site which have been thoroughly debunked.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22048
12 Jun 21

@no1marauder said
The study wasn't regarding other age groups, which you would know if you had bothered to read its title:

"Hospitalization of Adolescents Aged 12–17 Years with Laboratory-Confirmed COVID-19 — COVID-NET, 14 States, March 1, 2020–April 24, 2021"

Now don't you feel like a fool?
Tell us all how many times the difference is with all the other age groups.
You know fully well that the numbers are a crap load higher and the CDC had no desire to mention that. That is deliberately misleading.

Don't you feel like a fool?

Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
12 Jun 21
1 edit

@metal-brain said
Tell us all how many times the difference is with all the other age groups.
You know fully well that the numbers are a crap load higher and the CDC had no desire to mention that. That is deliberately misleading.

Don't you feel like a fool?
Actually, they mention it in the first sentence of that study that you very obviously still haven't read. In fact, they mention that fact repeatedly:

"Summary
What is already known about this topic?

"Most COVID-19–associated hospitalizations occur in adults, but severe disease occurs in all age groups, including adolescents aged 12–17 years."

"Most COVID-19–associated hospitalizations occur in older adults, but severe disease that requires hospitalization occurs in all age groups, including adolescents aged 12–17 years (1). "

"During March 1, 2020–April 24, 2021, the cumulative COVID-19–associated adolescent hospitalization rate (49.9) was 12.5 times lower than that in adults aged ≥18 years (675.6)."

"COVID-NET data indicate that COVID-19–associated hospitalization rates were lower in adolescents aged 12–17 years compared with those in adults but exceeded those among children aged 5–11 years during March 1, 2020–April 24, 2021."

"Population-based COVID-19–associated hospitalization rates among adolescents were lower than were those in adults, a finding consistent with studies showing that illness is generally milder in children than in adults (6). "

It's probably mentioned a few more times, but that is enough to show the profound falsity of your claim.

https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7023e1.htm

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22048
12 Jun 21

@no1marauder said
Do you even bother to read the articles you cite?

The first one accuses the Florida Department of Health, not the CDC, of manipulating data because the actual data would have been detrimental to the reopening plan!

The other two simply repeat crank conspiracy theories you have already presented on this site which have been thoroughly debunked.
"The other two simply repeat crank conspiracy theories you have already presented on this site which have been thoroughly debunked."

You are lying again.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22048
12 Jun 21

@no1marauder said
Actually, they mention it in the first sentence of that study that you very obviously still haven't read.
Is that what the CDC publicly stated? Yes or no?

Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
12 Jun 21

@metal-brain said
Is that what the CDC publicly stated? Yes or no?
I added quotes from the study.

You tell me.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22048
12 Jun 21

@no1marauder said
I added quotes from the study.

You tell me.
You didn't answer my question. I didn't ask what they wrote. I asked what they publicly stated. You know the difference.

Is that what the CDC stated publicly? Yes or no?

Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
12 Jun 21

@metal-brain said
You didn't answer my question. I didn't ask what they wrote. I asked what they publicly stated. You know the difference.

Is that what the CDC stated publicly? Yes or no?
No, I really don't know the difference between what a government publishes in official reports available to the public without charge and what they "stated publicly".

Perhaps you could enlighten us.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22048
12 Jun 21

@no1marauder said
No, I really don't know the difference between what a government publishes in official reports available to the public without charge and what they "stated publicly".

Perhaps you could enlighten us.
You know what I mean. The public generally does not read what we read. They rely on public statements from the CDC and hear it on the news.

You are evading my question because you will have to admit what you already know, the CDC deliberately mislead the public. Knowing it and admitting it are two different things.

Answer my question or admit you are wrong.

Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
12 Jun 21

@metal-brain said
You know what I mean. The public generally does not read what we read. They rely on public statements from the CDC and hear it on the news.

You are evading my question because you will have to admit what you already know, the CDC deliberately mislead the public. Knowing it and admitting it are two different things.

Answer my question or admit you are wrong.
Then, "yes", the CDC has consistently stated that "most children with COVID-19 have mild or no symptoms," https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2021/s0512-advisory-committee-signing.html and has made clear that the disease is more dangerous for those who are older.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22048
12 Jun 21

@no1marauder said
Then, "yes", the CDC has consistently stated that "most children with COVID-19 have mild or no symptoms," https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2021/s0512-advisory-committee-signing.html and has made clear that the disease is more dangerous for those who are older.
Your continual evading my question is an admission that I am right.
Good enough. Better luck next time.
😆

Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
12 Jun 21
1 edit

@metal-brain said
Your continual evading my question is an admission that I am right.
Good enough. Better luck next time.
😆
I just answered it. Sorry it wasn't in the way you wanted, but the evidence says what it says; the CDC has consistently said COVID19 wasn't as dangerous on average to adolescents as it was to older adults.

And you'd think you were right no matter how I answered it; you never admit your many, ludicrous errors.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22048
12 Jun 21

@no1marauder said
I just answered it. Sorry it wasn't in the way you wanted, but the evidence says what it says; the CDC has consistently said COVID19 wasn't as dangerous on average to adolescents as it was to older adults.

And you'd think you were right no matter how I answered it; you never admit your many, ludicrous errors.
We can agree on that for sure.
You still have not answered my question. Evading answering one question by stating the obvious isn't answering the question. I expected more dishonesty from you though. It only confirms how stupid you feel. Good enough. This was good for a laugh. I look forward to the next time you lie and pretend people don't notice you are making a fool out of yourself.

Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
12 Jun 21

@metal-brain said
We can agree on that for sure.
You still have not answered my question. Evading answering one question by stating the obvious isn't answering the question. I expected more dishonesty from you though. It only confirms how stupid you feel. Good enough. This was good for a laugh. I look forward to the next time you lie and pretend people don't notice you are making a fool out of yourself.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9T4yRzesgKM
I answered your question. You don't like the answer, so you're lying about me answering it. That's rather strange behavior.

Seriously, you need to see a professional mental health specialist.