Go back
pandering with lies

pandering with lies

Debates


System racism is not the problem, systematic poverty is the issue.


@e4e5f4d5 said
I see plenty of people of colour working.
Where do you live?
I see plenty of people of colour who are successful.
Where do you live?

In fact...
Today a company is more likely to hire a person of colour because that company is scared to be called racist.

Got anymore excuses?

A trucking company started up in my city.
The news did a story on it.
A Muslim man star ...[text shortened]... e right.
Discrimination is alive and well.
Always has been, Always will be.

Can I complain now?
"While education is widely viewed as the key to upward mobility for all races, the Pew Research Center analysis finds that the benefits of schooling often flow in unequal measure to blacks relative to whites. For example, among those with a bachelor’s degree, blacks earn significantly less than whites ($82,300 for black householders vs. $106,600 for whites). In fact, the income of blacks at all levels of educational attainment lags behind that of their white counterparts."

https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2016/06/27/1-demographic-trends-and-economic-well-being/


@eladar said
System racism is not the problem, systematic poverty is the issue.
Stop wasting money on bling and shoes and try to succeed is a start.


@e4e5f4d5 said
Stop wasting money on bling and shoes and try to succeed is a start.
Poverty knows no skin color.


@no1marauder

Could be based on passed performance history.
We base our future decisions on our past experience.

Maybe they don't perform as good in an average case basis.
Companies have to compete to survive.
Affirmative action in regards to pay is the end of a companies success.


@eladar said
Poverty knows no skin color.
True because I have been dirt poor for life.

I blame myself.

Not the white man.

1 edit

@no1marauder said
"While education is widely viewed as the key to upward mobility for all races, the Pew Research Center analysis finds that the benefits of schooling often flow in unequal measure to blacks relative to whites. For example, among those with a bachelor’s degree, blacks earn significantly less than whites ($82,300 for black householders vs. $106,600 for whites). In fact, t ...[text shortened]... ts."

https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2016/06/27/1-demographic-trends-and-economic-well-being/
So if you have a law degree and F. Lee Bailey has a law degree you *should* make the same pay.

🙄

I detect a fly in your ointment.


@earl-of-trumps said
So if you have a law degree and F. Lee Bailey has a law degree you *should* make the same pay.

🙄

I detect a fly in your ointment.
Sure, it must be a coincidence that at every level of educational attainment, blacks in the US make less than whites.

Or are you suggesting that one "race" is somehow "superior" to the other(s)?


@e4e5f4d5 said
@no1marauder

Could be based on passed performance history.
We base our future decisions on our past experience.

Maybe they don't perform as good in an average case basis.
Companies have to compete to survive.
Affirmative action in regards to pay is the end of a companies success.
So predominately white bosses think that blacks aren't as competent based on their perception of "history"?

I wonder what word would describe that?


You're the one putting labels on them.
You say "black man or black woman" instead of just their names.

YOU are the one who thinks he is superior to them.


@no1marauder said
So predominately white bosses think that blacks aren't as competent based on their perception of "history"?

I wonder what word would describe that?
Prudence.

1 edit

@no1marauder said
Sure, it must be a coincidence that at every level of educational attainment, blacks in the US make less than whites.

Or are you suggesting that one "race" is somehow "superior" to the other(s)?
I can only say that presumptions cannot be made. things have to be proven before
making any grand, sweeping changes in the law.

I have never looked up the differences in scholastic grades by "race", if such
a thing is even allowed to be published.



PS: after a moments reflection, it seems obvious to me that grade tolerances
for blacks v. whites in college entrance are different - and different for a reason.
If the groups scored equally in SAT's there'd be no need to mitigate differences


@earl-of-trumps said
I can only say that presumptions cannot be made. things have to be proven before
making any grand, sweeping changes in the law.

I have never looked up the differences in scholastic grades by "race", if such
a thing is even allowed to be published.
In other words, we should just ignore the evidence of discrimination. We should assume, without any data, that blacks perform more poorly at every educational level even when they succeed in completing it.

And you wonder why POC overwhelmingly reject right wing policies and politicians.

Your head in the sand attitude is no less poisonous than the thinly veiled racist attitudes of the other poster.


The ideas in the posts above are typical attitudes now.

Imagine what Louis Latimer had to go through in the 19th Century.

1 edit