@metal-brainsaid "When the door was opened, Pelosi and DEPAPE were both holding a hammer with one hand and DEPAPE had his other hand holding onto Pelosi’s forearm."
That did not happen when the door was opened. That happened after the police were inside. That is a clear contradiction. Didn't you notice that?
I notice you can't read. What do you think "When the door was opened" means?
@no1marauder That did not happen when the door was opened. That happened after the police were inside. That is a clear contradiction. Didn't you notice that?
@metal-brainsaid @no1marauder That did not happen when the door was opened. That happened after the police were inside. That is a clear contradiction. Didn't you notice that?
""When the door was opened, Pelosi and DEPAPE were both holding a hammer with one hand and DEPAPE had his other hand holding onto Pelosi’s forearm."
@no1maraudersaid ""When the door was opened, Pelosi and DEPAPE were both holding a hammer with one hand and DEPAPE had his other hand holding onto Pelosi’s forearm."
You really need some remedial reading lessons.
No you do. Pelosi opened the door and let the police in. The attack happened later, not when the door was opened. It happened after the door was opened because Paul walked away from the police back to Depape.
Why don't you just admit the police report is inaccurate? Depape didn't attack Paul when the door was opened. He was attacked after the door was opened. Do you know the difference between "when" and "after". When means at the same time. After means later.
This is basic grade school reading comprehension. Stop pretending you don't understand present and past tense.
@metal-brainsaid No you do. Pelosi opened the door and let the police in. The attack happened later, not when the door was opened. It happened after the door was opened because Paul walked away from the police back to Depape.
Why don't you just admit the police report is inaccurate? Depape didn't attack Paul when the door was opened. He was attacked after the door was opened. Do you k ...[text shortened]... sic grade school reading comprehension. Stop pretending you don't understand present and past tense.
You're quite out of your mind. The Criminal Complaint is quite specific; your reliance on an article retracted weeks ago is insane. Your continued insistence on insisting a news article (that the source admitted was inaccurate) is right and a Criminal Complaint based on affidavits filed under penalty of perjury is wrong is typical of nutjob conspiracy theorists like yourself.
There is no "contradiction"; the Criminal Complaint refutes the outdated article you are relying on.
@no1maraudersaid You're quite out of your mind. The Criminal Complaint is quite specific; your reliance on an article retracted weeks ago is insane. Your continued insistence on insisting a news article (that the source admitted was inaccurate) is right and a Criminal Complaint based on affidavits filed under penalty of perjury is wrong is typical of nutjob conspiracy theorists like yours ...[text shortened]... There is no "contradiction"; the Criminal Complaint refutes the outdated article you are relying on.
You are a liar and you know it.
You are like a child.
@no1maraudersaid I notice you can't read. What do you think "When the door was opened" means?
It means at the same time the door was opened which is not how it happened. It happened after the door was opened. Now Depape's son is fueling the gay sex narrative. LOL!
@no1maraudersaid You're quite out of your mind. The Criminal Complaint is quite specific; your reliance on an article retracted weeks ago is insane. Your continued insistence on insisting a news article (that the source admitted was inaccurate) is right and a Criminal Complaint based on affidavits filed under penalty of perjury is wrong is typical of nutjob conspiracy theorists like yours ...[text shortened]... There is no "contradiction"; the Criminal Complaint refutes the outdated article you are relying on.
You don't want to acknowledge the difference between "when" and "after". You are out of your mind if you think "when" means "after".
@jj-adamssaid Paid off to say it, no doubt.
See how easy it is to be like you?
Like most right wingers, you just make s**t up.
His last court appearance is hardly supportive of the looney tune theories: https://www.cbsnews.com/sanfrancisco/news/david-depape-paul-pelosi-not-guilty-plea-san-francisco-nancy-pelosi/
This is a conspiracy of silence. News outlets want to see the evidence.
Well, you've seen the evidence now. DePape has his hands on Pelosi and the hammer as soon as the door opens and Pelosi doesn't "step back" until DePape wrestles the hammer free.
21 Nov '22 15:02
Questions about Paul Pelosi attack
Back to Top