21 Nov 22
@metal-brain saidI notice you can't read. What do you think "When the door was opened" means?
"When the door was opened, Pelosi and DEPAPE were both holding a hammer with one hand and DEPAPE had his other hand holding onto Pelosi’s forearm."
That did not happen when the door was opened. That happened after the police were inside. That is a clear contradiction. Didn't you notice that?
21 Nov 22
@no1marauder
That did not happen when the door was opened. That happened after the police were inside. That is a clear contradiction. Didn't you notice that?
@metal-brain said""When the door was opened, Pelosi and DEPAPE were both holding a hammer with one hand and DEPAPE had his other hand holding onto Pelosi’s forearm."
@no1marauder
That did not happen when the door was opened. That happened after the police were inside. That is a clear contradiction. Didn't you notice that?
You really need some remedial reading lessons.
21 Nov 22
@no1marauder saidNo you do. Pelosi opened the door and let the police in. The attack happened later, not when the door was opened. It happened after the door was opened because Paul walked away from the police back to Depape.
""When the door was opened, Pelosi and DEPAPE were both holding a hammer with one hand and DEPAPE had his other hand holding onto Pelosi’s forearm."
You really need some remedial reading lessons.
Why don't you just admit the police report is inaccurate? Depape didn't attack Paul when the door was opened. He was attacked after the door was opened. Do you know the difference between "when" and "after". When means at the same time. After means later.
This is basic grade school reading comprehension. Stop pretending you don't understand present and past tense.
@metal-brain saidYou're quite out of your mind. The Criminal Complaint is quite specific; your reliance on an article retracted weeks ago is insane. Your continued insistence on insisting a news article (that the source admitted was inaccurate) is right and a Criminal Complaint based on affidavits filed under penalty of perjury is wrong is typical of nutjob conspiracy theorists like yourself.
No you do. Pelosi opened the door and let the police in. The attack happened later, not when the door was opened. It happened after the door was opened because Paul walked away from the police back to Depape.
Why don't you just admit the police report is inaccurate? Depape didn't attack Paul when the door was opened. He was attacked after the door was opened. Do you k ...[text shortened]... sic grade school reading comprehension. Stop pretending you don't understand present and past tense.
There is no "contradiction"; the Criminal Complaint refutes the outdated article you are relying on.
22 Nov 22
@no1marauder saidYou are a liar and you know it.
You're quite out of your mind. The Criminal Complaint is quite specific; your reliance on an article retracted weeks ago is insane. Your continued insistence on insisting a news article (that the source admitted was inaccurate) is right and a Criminal Complaint based on affidavits filed under penalty of perjury is wrong is typical of nutjob conspiracy theorists like yours ...[text shortened]... There is no "contradiction"; the Criminal Complaint refutes the outdated article you are relying on.
You are like a child.
16 Dec 22
@no1marauder saidIt means at the same time the door was opened which is not how it happened. It happened after the door was opened. Now Depape's son is fueling the gay sex narrative. LOL!
I notice you can't read. What do you think "When the door was opened" means?
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/some-sort-sex-slave-son-paul-pelosis-attacker-breaks-silence-fuels-speculation
21 Jan 23
@no1marauder saidYou don't want to acknowledge the difference between "when" and "after". You are out of your mind if you think "when" means "after".
You're quite out of your mind. The Criminal Complaint is quite specific; your reliance on an article retracted weeks ago is insane. Your continued insistence on insisting a news article (that the source admitted was inaccurate) is right and a Criminal Complaint based on affidavits filed under penalty of perjury is wrong is typical of nutjob conspiracy theorists like yours ...[text shortened]... There is no "contradiction"; the Criminal Complaint refutes the outdated article you are relying on.
https://trendingpoliticsnews.com/paul-pelosi-case-takes-turn-news-outlets-file-court-motion-against-pelosis/?utm_source=papa&utm_medium=twitter
This is a conspiracy of silence. News outlets want to see the evidence.
- Joined
- 23 Feb 22
- Moves
- 1798
21 Jan 23
@no1marauder saidPaid off to say it, no doubt.
Or you can read it like the sworn statements attached to the Criminal Complaint do, including the accused's recorded confession.
See how easy it is to be like you?
21 Jan 23
@jj-adams saidLike most right wingers, you just make s**t up.
Paid off to say it, no doubt.
See how easy it is to be like you?
His last court appearance is hardly supportive of the looney tune theories: https://www.cbsnews.com/sanfrancisco/news/david-depape-paul-pelosi-not-guilty-plea-san-francisco-nancy-pelosi/
28 Jan 23
@metal-brain saidWell, you've seen the evidence now. DePape has his hands on Pelosi and the hammer as soon as the door opens and Pelosi doesn't "step back" until DePape wrestles the hammer free.
You don't want to acknowledge the difference between "when" and "after". You are out of your mind if you think "when" means "after".
https://trendingpoliticsnews.com/paul-pelosi-case-takes-turn-news-outlets-file-court-motion-against-pelosis/?utm_source=papa&utm_medium=twitter
This is a conspiracy of silence. News outlets want to see the evidence.
How's that crow taste?
