@kevcvs57said Yes kev is waiting for the trial but that’s not to say I will not respond to you or anyone else’s anti lgbtq+ bs slopey shoulders given that every reasonable thing we actually know about this guy from his posting history and his own statements points to him being an unbalanced MAGA / Qanon extremist.
You guys totally daydreamed a really telling alternative gay story line fr ...[text shortened]... t that drove this vulnerable person to do what he did. The irony of your approach is not lost on me.
@no1maraudersaid They don't need to "prove" it to some nutjob on the web.
If they have such footage, they'll surely use it in the criminal trial if one occurs. If not, so what? DePape already confessed in a recorded statement.
There are nutjobs on both sides. Stop pretending all nutjobs are right wingers.
@kevcvs57 How did he get attacked after he let the police in?
Did the police let Paul get attacked?
This is not a complicated question. Did Paul really let the police in? How could Paul let the police in and be seen by the police struggling with Depape over a hammer, get hit in the head with a hammer and the police be powerless to stop the attack? Were the cops eating popcorn while being entertained by the whole fiasco?
@metal-brainsaid For such a widely reported story there are a lot of things we do not know about this that we should.
Yes, the reasonable thing to do when we do not know all the details of some event is to fill in the blanks with UFOs, vampires, and moonbeam-crazed chupacabras.
@soothfastsaid Yes, the reasonable thing to do when we do not know all the details of some event is to fill in the blanks with UFOs, vampires, and moonbeam-crazed chupacabras.
No, it is to keep asking over and over again until you get an answer.
The problem is that you accept contradictions without question. You don't care what really happened. If it was a republican you would care out of partisan bias.
What if the same thing happened to Trump? Would you be satisfied with contradictory statements? Of course not. You would want the body cam video released and would make a big stink about it. You know you would.
@metal-brainsaid No, it is to keep asking over and over again until you get an answer.
The problem is that you accept contradictions without question. You don't care what really happened. If it was a republican you would care out of partisan bias.
What if the same thing happened to Trump? Would you be satisfied with contradictory statements? Of course not. You would want the body cam video released and would make a big stink about it. You know you would.
Crime and accident scenes are chaotic. Things happen fast, people are running around, and getting conflicting reports from people at the scene happens all the time. I'm content to accept that there are aspects of the incident in question that we will likely never have nailed down with certainty. It's a common thing in any kind of situation like this.
But you go on beating those false-flag operation drums, like you always do. Crazy.
And why the hell do you keep plugging Trump into everything? I don't give a rat's ass about Trump right now.
@Soothfast So nothing to see here....move along. Right?
I notice you don't want to talk about how you would react if it was Trump instead of Pelosi. Don't you want to admit you would not want to sweep it under the rug if it was someone you dislike?
I notice you don't want to talk about how you would react if it was Trump instead of Pelosi. Don't you want to admit you would not want to sweep it under the rug if it was someone you dislike?
Whatever you're trying to float here will not support your conspiracy theory. But as usual you're blithering incoherently.
If someone did in Trump I'd be out dancing in the streets, no questions asked.
@Soothfast I notice you don't want to talk about how you would react if it was Trump instead of Pelosi. Don't you want to admit you would not want to sweep it under the rug if it was someone you dislike?
@Metal-Brain You ADMITTED to being communist and that puts you right into ultraright territory because communism doesn't allow people freedom, that is how it has worked out in every version tried. Remember Pol Pot? How many million died because of that dictator claiming to be commie? You think killing LITERALLY millions of his own citizens is a way LEFT thing? Try ULTRA ULTRA RIGHT WING.
@sonhousesaid @Metal-Brain You ADMITTED to being communist and that puts you right into ultraright territory because communism doesn't allow people freedom, that is how it has worked out in every version tried. Remember Pol Pot? How many million died because of that dictator claiming to be commie? You think killing LITERALLY millions of his own citizens is a way LEFT thing? Try ULTRA ULTRA RIGHT WING.
Communists are right wing? LOL! So Stalin and Hitler were both ultraright?
Democrats do not allow people freedom. You all have become authoritarians. Does that make you a right winger? You need to learn political science. You are spewing ridiculous nonsense.