Go back
Rittenhouse trial…

Rittenhouse trial…

Debates

Vote Up
Vote Down

@sleepyguy said
It WAS clear within hours to people paying attention and not watching leftist propaganda. The YouTubers were on it, synchronizing their feeds into a timeline of events before during and after the shootings, complete with an interview of Kyle before it all happened, showing his naivte and motivations, and of the crazy and aggressive behaviour of Rosenbaum, the weapons carrie ...[text shortened]... t attacking him. But they charged him anyway even though it was clear he was just defending himself.
Because we all know that conservative, brown-shirt propaganda is always right.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@dood111 said
None of that is the issue, where he came from, etc., it doesn't matter.
Simple fact is he was attacked and had to defend himself or die.
Got it?
He was attacked because he killed two people, and was brandishing the gun and pointing it at others and he should have been beaten down by the mob and held for the police.

If he was black, he would have died in the street that night, shot by the same ineffective police that mistakenly thought he was a hero because he was white.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@huckleberryhound said
Defending child rapists is woke now.


Figures.
Defending murderers is standard for conservatives.

Well, it didn't used to be, but it sure as hell is now.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@mott-the-hoople said
you have never been in a life or death situation…things happen quick. All your whining is not going to change what the jury ruled.
And you have?

No, crying because someone took your parking spot doesn't count.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@no1marauder said
The right wing glee over the verdict cannot be based on simply the merits of the case; there are thousands of cases every year in the US where self-defense claims are upheld and you don't see right wingers make a peep about it.

No, what they are happy about is that they think the verdict gives them carte blanche to wield guns to threaten and even kill people protesting ...[text shortened]... matter what the bulk of the People desire and are perfectly willing to kill to gain and maintain it.
This. So, SO this.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@mott-the-hoople said
I responded, you dont have any experience with what you are talking about.

You should stop your whining, a jury answered.
Was OJ innocent, too?

Vote Up
Vote Down

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/kyle-rittenhouse-verdict-violates-these-5-standards-for-claiming-self-defense-11637358131

Vote Up
Vote Down


@suzianne said
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/kyle-rittenhouse-verdict-violates-these-5-standards-for-claiming-self-defense-11637358131
Not one of the 5 elements he says were violated apply to what happened.


@no1marauder said
You and other right wingers have vastly exaggerated the damage done for propaganda purposes. That you and others think killing protestors is an acceptable response to what happened last summer is an unsurprising extension of your ideology.
===That you and others think killing protestors is an acceptable response===

🙄 🙄 🙄


@sh76 said
===That you and others think killing protestors is an acceptable response===

🙄 🙄 🙄
Marauder's hyperbole is legendary.
He neglects to mention the "protestors" were trying to kill him.


@dood111 said
Marauder's hyperbole is legendary.
He neglects to mention the "protestors" were trying to kill him.
It's more than just hyperbole. The idea that I said or implied that "killing protesters" is an "acceptable response" to anything but attacking someone with potentially deadly force, is an outright lie.


@sh76
That is just another example of the right rewriting history. Like "Jan 6, was a peaceful tourist tour' which is actually being puked out.


Culturalism hit tonight in a WI Christmas Parade


@sh76 said
It's more than just hyperbole. The idea that I said or implied that "killing protesters" is an "acceptable response" to anything but attacking someone with potentially deadly force, is an outright lie.
Leftists lie.

No1 = Joy Reid.