Go back
So how will WOKE, DEI fare for you?

So how will WOKE, DEI fare for you?

Debates


@Suzianne said
You're delusional.
No I am not. I have actually seen videos of men competing in women's sports, I dont have time to bring you up to speed, but it is true.
If we find that it is true, would you be OK with that practice?


@AverageJoe1 said
I think we concluded that I am not a lawyer. Who started that rumor?
YOU said that. Now you are rescinding that claim? You mentioned being a lawyer a BUNCH of times and you cannot deny that. Well you COULD deny that but we can search your posts and prove it unconditionally you DID claim to be a lawyer.


@sonhouse said
YOU said that. Now you are rescinding that claim? You mentioned being a lawyer a BUNCH of times and you cannot deny that. Well you COULD deny that but we can search your posts and prove it unconditionally you DID claim to be a lawyer.
I think it was a concerted opinion of more than just me. I think you yourself said I am not a lawyer. I am getting dizzy.
Maybe my claiming, if I did, was one of my famous analogies! We can sure discusss it, get a contingency together and we can get to the bottom of it.
I more wanted to talk abut the evil Biden who is covering LA 100%, but only gave the pitiful wretches in Hurricane-torn Ashville North Carolina $700 per person. OR was it per person?


@AverageJoe1 said
No I am not. I have actually seen videos of men competing in women's sports, I dont have time to bring you up to speed, but it is true.
If we find that it is true, would you be OK with that practice?
No, you haven't.


@AverageJoe1 said
I think it was a concerted opinion of more than just me. I think you yourself said I am not a lawyer. I am getting dizzy.
Maybe my claiming, if I did, was one of my famous analogies! We can sure discusss it, get a contingency together and we can get to the bottom of it.
I more wanted to talk abut the evil Biden who is covering LA 100%, but only gave the pitiful wretches in Hurricane-torn Ashville North Carolina $700 per person. OR was it per person?
You're mumbling again.


@Suzianne said
No, you haven't.
Maybe he's referring to the Rodney Dangerfield movie "Ladybugs" from 1992.


@wildgrass said
Maybe he's referring to the Rodney Dangerfield movie "Ladybugs" from 1992.
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0104670/

Okay, now that is weird.


@Suzianne said
No, you haven't.
Poor debating little feller, Am i going to have to go over the Science Forum? Plz don't cause that, SHouse is over there..

A critique, if I may?
I said in my post that I have seen videos of men competing w women. You answer no you haven't. You are in Time Out for a few days.
Shouse will answer any of our joint issues for me.


@AverageJoe1 said
Poor debating little feller, Am i going to have to go over the Science Forum? Plz don't cause that, SHouse is over there..

A critique, if I may?
I said in my post that I have seen videos of men competing w women. You answer no you haven't. You are in Time Out for a few days.
Shouse will answer any of our joint issues for me.
Define 'men'. That is the usual tactic of the ultrarightwingnut crowd.
You are assuming a trans man getting the whack job and female hormones and silicon breast implants is still a man even though 'he' cannot reproduce since goodbye balls and the leftover muscles are STILL going to be stronger than any woman.
Is that about it?


@sonhouse said
Define 'men'. That is the usual tactic of the ultrarightwingnut crowd.
You are assuming a trans man getting the whack job and female hormones and silicon breast implants is still a man even though 'he' cannot reproduce since goodbye balls and the leftover muscles are STILL going to be stronger than any woman.
Is that about it?
Stick it, man. I wrote you once, would you be OK if I you were about to watch your grandaughter race in a women's (girls', whatever) swim meet, and a male of the same age appeared, and the judges let him race against her?

Watch it, everybody is reading this, and I want to put on record, that I have asked you this very same question 20 times over the last six months. And you simply ignored, and you would not answer. So everybody is watching you now you brought this on yourself.
That is the extent of the question… You can play your games about all the stuff I wrote, but what I wrote is irrelevant to this question, or whether I am a lawyer or not is irrelevant to this question. Would you or wouldn't you allow this person with all of his parts to compete with your daughter.


Uhhh, did you write about reproduction? Jesus.

1 edit

@AverageJoe1 said
Stick it, man. I wrote you once, would you be OK if I you were about to watch your grandaughter race in a women's (girls', whatever) swim meet, and a male of the same age appeared, and the judges let him race against her?

Watch it, everybody is reading this, and I want to put on record, that I have asked you this very same question 20 times over the last six month ...[text shortened]... on. Would you or wouldn't you allow this person with all of his parts to compete with your daughter.
I just spelled out the basics of transitioning from male to female, there was no pejorative installed, just the facts of the issue.
I asked if you say after all that, hormones and such, is the former man now still stronger than a female athlete. That was ALL I asked. There was no implications of anything else and I assume you have to be thinking along those lines that a former male turned into an incomplete female would be somehow still stronger than a female competitor.
And you answer thus? Am I wrong in that assumption?

ALL his parts? A trans doesn't have balls, his parts are ripped apart and forced inside out to be some kind of fake vagina so what are you talking about?


@AverageJoe1 said
Poor debating little feller, Am i going to have to go over the Science Forum? Plz don't cause that, SHouse is over there..

A critique, if I may?
I said in my post that I have seen videos of men competing w women. You answer no you haven't. You are in Time Out for a few days.
Shouse will answer any of our joint issues for me.
Almost like "I've seen it" isn't a convincing argument.


@wildgrass said
Almost like "I've seen it" isn't a convincing argument.
You got me there. You are not convinced. I will cancel my plans and research, this will be tough


@sonhouse said
I just spelled out the basics of transitioning from male to female, there was no pejorative installed, just the facts of the issue.
I asked if you say after all that, hormones and such, is the former man now still stronger than a female athlete. That was ALL I asked. There was no implications of anything else and I assume you have to be thinking along those lines that a for ...[text shortened]... are ripped apart and forced inside out to be some kind of fake vagina so what are you talking about?
BOO! Lose again.