@no1marauder saidRight -- I think the proper term is biological gender.
It's off-topic, but there is no such thing as a "birth gender".
@no1marauder saidI've been following it very closely.
You have almost zero knowledge of what actually transpired but because this kid killed some people who have political views you don't like you are willing to release him without even a trial.
Sick.
Watched all of the video footage.
There isn't a moment here where it does not appear to be self-defense.
Even if the political positions were reversed, Kyle Rittenhouse would be in the right. And that is always the most important meausre in these sorts of things: how would you feel if the shoe was on the other foot?
@philokalia saidThey weren’t nazis, are you even sure it was his car. I wouldn’t kill two people to protect my car on account of having a comprehensive insurance policy, was the murderer driving whilst uninsured is that ok in the US?
If a Nazi attacks a black person who is standing in the way of them burning their car, isn't it a public good that justice won out by having the black person legally and properly defend themselves against the attacks of a maniacal Nazi?
I think you can figure out the rest of this from here.
Tell me how this would not be a parallel to the above.
@kevcvs57 said(1) ... You are supposed to think of this situation as applicable in any variety of political combinations.
They weren’t nazis, are you even sure it was his car. I wouldn’t kill two people to protect my car on account of having a comprehensive insurance policy, was the murderer driving whilst uninsured is that ok in the US?
(2) When people are brandishing guns and shooting, then someone charges you, potentially to strip you of your gun and shoot you, would you open fire?
(3) I'd show my gun to someone for my car.
If they kept coming, I could only conclude that they really want my car -- enough to charge an armed man, which is pretty insane, and I would imagine that they would want to disarm me and potentially shoot me.
It's not a 100% chance that their goal is to disarm me then shoot me, but I am not willing to bet my life on the opposite.
I would shoot.
... And this is totally an unexplainable Darwin award moment.
If someone is dumb enough to charge a man holding a gun and not accept the deterrent, what can anyone do?!
@philokalia saidThe law does not give you a carte blanche right to shoot someone just because you have a gun and might, in your paranoid mind, think they might take it away from you and shoot you.
(1) ... You are supposed to think of this situation as applicable in any variety of political combinations.
(2) When people are brandishing guns and shooting, then someone charges you, potentially to strip you of your gun and shoot you, would you open fire?
(3) I'd show my gun to someone for my car.
If they kept coming, I could only conclude that they [i]really ...[text shortened]... eone is dumb enough to charge a man holding a gun and not accept the deterrent, what can anyone do?!
Great article in the Milwaukee Sentinel Journal: https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/local/wisconsin/2020/08/30/witnesses-detail-kenosha-shooting-seeing-kyle-rittenhouse-protest-jacob-blake-wisconsin-17-year-old/5656907002/
It shows Rittenhouse and other "militia" members were aiming guns at people constantly and that the police forced the protesters to the area where the "militia" was.
Some excerpts:
"Jeremiah just wanted to find his car and go home, but he was trapped.
A massive line of police in riot gear had just forced him and hundreds of other protesters out of Kenosha's Civic Center Park and into the street. After that, there was nowhere to go. Soldiers and cops blocked one end of the road. White guys with big guns blocked the other.
It was past 11 p.m. Tuesday, the third night of protests after a Kenosha police officer shot Jacob Blake seven times in the back. Jeremiah had received a text from a friend saying a bunch of protesters had their tires slashed. He wanted to get to his car before vandals did. He decided the quickest path was to cut through a parking lot.
As he made his way toward it, Jeremiah saw more armed white men. Two crouched on the roof of a building, sniper style. Two or three others stood guard over the lot. One of them, a babyface with a backward ball cap, raised an assault rifle and pointed it at him."
"Early in the evening, before he became stranded in the search for his car, Jeremiah got into an argument with one of them. Jeremiah was talking to a reporter when an angry woman interrupted, telling him she was tired of people like him burning things down. As he argued he'd done no such thing, an armed man came up and shoved him.
"Be ready," Jeremiah recalls the man saying. "If you come toward us, we're gonna open fire."
"In another clip, an unidentified armed white man in a baseball cap and a ballistic vest — an unofficial uniform of the self-styled militias — says this: "You know what the cops told us today? They were like, 'We’re gonna push ‘em down by you, 'cause you can deal with them and then we’re gonna leave.'""
"Several former classmates at Lakes Community High School in Antioch told VICE News they remembered Rittenhouse as short-tempered and easily offended. He was known for his love of the police, guns and President Donald Trump, they said."
""Everyone was yelling, 'That's the shooter!'" Jeremiah said. "And the police just let him pass."
There needs to be a full investigation into this "militia" group and the actions of police that night.
Rittenhouse is currently being held in a juvenile detention facility in his home State of Illinois and his lawyer says he will fight extradition to Wisconsin because "we believe Illinois has a public policy interest in protecting its children,"(!). https://chicago.suntimes.com/columnists/2020/8/30/21407756/tucker-carlson-radical-right-embracing-illinois-youth-accused-two-kenosha-killings
The actual chance that a State won't extradite someone accused of multiple murders and other felonies in another State are infinitesimal to nonexistent.
@no1marauder saidI think this is where you are wrong.
The law does not give you a carte blanche right to shoot someone just because you have a gun and might, in your paranoid mind, think they might take it away from you and shoot you.
I believe it is generally known that if you try to fight over a police officers gun, you can be justifiably shot for it.
The same should be true for a gun in any circumstance since the consequences are so dire.
@philokalia saidhe is wrong...but will not admit it. He has a track record of making untrue remarks then obfuscating the matter. It takes a grown man to admit it when they are wrong.
I think this is where you are wrong.
I believe it is generally known that if you try to fight over a police officers gun, you can be justifiably shot for it.
The same should be true for a gun in any circumstance since the consequences are so dire.
@philokalia saidi'm not wrong; you are insisting the mere fact that one has a gun justifies employing deadly force in the circumstance of any struggle. This is clearly not the law.
I think this is where you are wrong.
I believe it is generally known that if you try to fight over a police officers gun, you can be justifiably shot for it.
The same should be true for a gun in any circumstance since the consequences are so dire.
Let's say someone points a gun at you and you attempt to take the gun away from that in your own self-defense. Do you think they can legally shoot you and succeed on a self-defense claim?
Remember this thread: https://www.redhotpawn.com/forum/debates/black-conservative-reporter-stabbed-in-portland.186360
If you recall, Hampe stabbed a conservative "reporter" who had physically accosted him. Then he ran and was pursued and captured by members of the protest group who held him for the police. Suppose Hampe had stabbed one of those pursuers; do you think he would have a valid self defense claim? Note this hypothetical is analogous to the Rittenhouse case except we don't know what happened to initiate the Kenosha incident.
From the National Review article I cited on page 2 quoting Wisconsin law:
"(a) A person who engages in unlawful conduct of a type likely to provoke others to attack him or her and thereby does provoke an attack is not entitled to claim the privilege of self-defense against such attack, except when the attack which ensues is of a type causing the person engaging in the unlawful conduct to reasonably believe that he or she is in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm. In such a case, the person engaging in the unlawful conduct is privileged to act in self-defense, but the person is not privileged to resort to the use of force intended or likely to cause death to the person’s assailant unless the person reasonably believes he or she has exhausted every other reasonable means to escape from or otherwise avoid death or great bodily harm at the hands of his or her assailant.
(b) The privilege lost by provocation may be regained if the actor in good faith withdraws from the fight and gives adequate notice thereof to his or her assailant.
(c) A person who provokes an attack, whether by lawful or unlawful conduct, with intent to use such an attack as an excuse to cause death or great bodily harm to his or her assailant is not entitled to claim the privilege of self-defense.
https://www.nationalreview.com/2020/08/does-kyle-rittenhouse-have-a-self-defense-claim/
Your version of the law would allow someone to illegally point a gun at someone else and kill them with impunity if they tried to disarm the armed person. That is rather clearly not the law.
The Ahmaud Arbery killing would be an example where an assailant illegally pointed a gun at someone and then killed them when they in self-defense tried to disarm their attacker. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-52623151
@no1marauder saidOh yes, if Hempe was being violently accosted by a mob trying to stop him, he has every reason to fear for his life if there is deadly force in play.
i'm not wrong; you are insisting the mere fact that one has a gun justifies employing deadly force in the circumstance of any struggle. This is clearly not the law.
Let's say someone points a gun at you and you attempt to take the gun away from that in your own self-defense. Do you think they can legally shoot you and succeed on a self-defense claim?
Remember this t ...[text shortened]... alogous to the Rittenhouse case except we don't know what happened to initiate the Kenosha incident.
He has no obligation to stop or not defend himself.
There's a reason why police identify themselves (and are easily identifiable) and give verbal commands -- drop the weapon, hands up, etc., because these start a process of voluntary surrender to avoid bloodshed.
If you cannot provide this process to someone, there is no obligation for you to interfere, and interfering may be very dangerous.
If I wanted to stop Hempe, and he points out his knife at me, and I decide to go in and attack him... how could he be to blame for stabbing me if I am not an officer of the law? Especially if I am from the same mob of people that may be a menace to him.
@no1marauder said(1) Illegally pointing a gun at someone can still be a crime.
From the National Review article I cited on page 2 quoting Wisconsin law:
"(a) A person who engages in unlawful conduct of a type likely to provoke others to attack him or her and thereby does provoke an attack is not entitled to claim the privilege of self-defense against such attack, except when the attack which ensues is of a type causing the person engaging ...[text shortened]... y in self-defense tried to disarm their attacker. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-52623151
But charging someone who has a gun illegally pointed on you is, and always will be, a Darwin award, no matter how "legal" or "illegal" the situation is.
(2) Kyle did nothing wrong. Wisconsin is an open carry state. He was defending property from rioting thugs.
Gunshots happen...
A rioter charges him -- bang, down.
Two more rioters attack him while he is trying to extricate himself from the situation, one of which is armed with a gun (as many in this mob are wont to be), and they both get shot.
Where's the crime?