The $88 baseball

The $88 baseball

Debates

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Pawn Whisperer

My Kingdom fora Pawn

Joined
09 Jan 19
Moves
18622
13 Jul 20
2 edits

@Philokalia

I included a post that showed an abridged list of items that either include 88
in their name (Oldsmobile 88 is one more I thought of) or had 88 in the
price tag. the items listed were from a broad range of consumer items.

I came to the conclusion that "88" is a desirable number in the retail industry because,
for some reason or another, consumers like that number, 88!

So since the baseball in question is a consumer product, it should not be a
surprise to see that price, $88, as opposed to $85 or $90.

So just cause for the price of the baseball at $88 is given. There are two theories,
then. therefor, it is clearly incumbent on the accusers to demonstrate that it is
the intention to price the baseball at $88 - not because of it's attractive price,
but so as to send a dog whistle to white supremacists.

In other words, Phil, forgedd'aboud'it. Put the fork in them they're all done.

So is this thread. I'm out.

K

Germany

Joined
27 Oct 08
Moves
3118
13 Jul 20

@philokalia said
Wait, how am I possibly minimizing"Nazi persecution of political opponents?"
The inverted red triangle was used for political opponents. Moreover, communism certainly was not "fringe" at that time. Hence, your characterization of this symbol being used for "the fringe far left" is false.

By trying to minimize the extent of Nazi persecution of political opponents (among them also many Jews), you engage in Holocaust denial.

K

Germany

Joined
27 Oct 08
Moves
3118
13 Jul 20

@philokalia said
There doesn't even need to be an obvious explanation because we aren't even at some point where it is logical to conclude that somebody in DHS is a Nazi ... trying to... uhhh... ????? ... by throwing out the number 88 in some report.

What's to defend? What's to explain away?

You are simply advancing a numerological conspiracy theory.
So you can't explain why someone would use "less than 13 out of 88" then? Is it something you've found rather typically in other contexts, or maybe with other random numbers?

Pawn Whisperer

My Kingdom fora Pawn

Joined
09 Jan 19
Moves
18622
13 Jul 20

@kazetnagorra said
So you can't explain why someone would use "less than 13 out of 88" then? Is it something you've found rather typically in other contexts, or maybe with other random numbers?
Are you saying that if Phil can't explain it then there is no explanation, and
you have therefor proved your point??

Ya. suurrrrrrrrrrre.

K

Germany

Joined
27 Oct 08
Moves
3118
13 Jul 20

@earl-of-trumps said
Are you saying that if Phil can't explain it then there is no explanation, and
you have therefor proved your point??

Ya. suurrrrrrrrrrre.
I am saying that until you, Phil or anyone else come up with a more plausible explanation than the one I gave, the one I gave should be considered the most plausible explanation.

Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
13 Jul 20
1 edit

@kazetnagorra said
I am saying that until you, Phil or anyone else come up with a more plausible explanation than the one I gave, the one I gave should be considered the most plausible explanation.
Here's a "plausible" one:

"Under the Immigration and Nationality Act, an applicant must
generally demonstrate "a well-founded fear of persecution on
account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a
particular social group, or political opinion."
Immigration lawyers say any applicants who appear to meet
that criteria in their initial interviews should be allowed to
make their cases in court. They oppose encouraging asylum
officers to take a stricter stance on questioning claims and
rejecting applications.
Interviews to assess credible fear are conducted almost
immediately after an asylum request is made, often at the border
or in detention facilities by immigration agents or asylum
officers, and most applicants easily clear that hurdle. Between
July and September of 2016, U.S. asylum officers accepted nearly 88 percent of the claims of credible fear, according to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services data."

https://lta.reuters.com/articulo/idLTAL1N1FZ27Q

So the initial interviewers accepted 88 out of 100 claims of "credible fear" but the February 2018 DHS release says only 13 of those were accepted by the immigration judges.


Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar, Kaz.

K

Germany

Joined
27 Oct 08
Moves
3118
13 Jul 20

@no1marauder said
Here's a "plausible" one:

"Under the Immigration and Nationality Act, an applicant must
generally demonstrate "a well-founded fear of persecution on
account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a
particular social group, or political opinion."
Immigration lawyers say any applicants who appear to meet
that criteria in their initial interviews should ...[text shortened]... ar" but the February 2018 DHS release says only 13 of those were accepted by the immigration judges.
Seems like a reasonable explanation.

Quiz Master

RHP Arms

Joined
09 Jun 07
Moves
48793
14 Jul 20

@earl-of-trumps said
I included a post that showed an abridged list of items that either include 88
in their name (Oldsmobile 88 is one more I thought of) or had 88 in the
price tag. the items listed were from a broad range of consumer items.

I came to the conclusion that "88" is a desirable number in the retail industry because,
for some reason or another, consumers like that number, 88!
So other products are priced at "88" but by your own admission you don't know why and choose to assume it is for "some reason or another"?
Bravo.
Good investigation.

Could the "some reason or another" be ....

Quiz Master

RHP Arms

Joined
09 Jun 07
Moves
48793
14 Jul 20

@earl-of-trumps said
So since the baseball in question is a consumer product, it should not be a
surprise to see that price, $88, as opposed to $85 or $90.
And it is now priced at $87.50

Why?

I suppose their manufacturing costs went down ... right, Earl?

Quiz Master

RHP Arms

Joined
09 Jun 07
Moves
48793
14 Jul 20

@philokalia said
I think it's obvious:
I think it's obvious you are plainly refusing to answer simple questions.

Quiz Master

RHP Arms

Joined
09 Jun 07
Moves
48793
14 Jul 20

@philokalia said
There's a million reasons to ignore this silly numerological conspiracy theory.
This is nothing to do with numerology is it?

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
10 Dec 06
Moves
8528
14 Jul 20

@kazetnagorra said
Seems like a reasonable explanation.
😆

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
10 Dec 06
Moves
8528
14 Jul 20
1 edit

@kazetnagorra said
Seems like a reasonable explanation.
You don't know how painful this is for me. On the one hand you have one of "your own" absolutely shellacking you! On the other hand, I have to admit that no1marauder has delivered said shellacking...

😆 😆 😕 🤔 😲 😞

Insanity at Masada

tinyurl.com/mw7txe34

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26660
14 Jul 20

When Helter Skelter 2: Electric Boogaloo goes down Earl of Trumps is going to be so surprised...

Don't worry Earl, it's just a retro concert. 😉

S. Korea

Joined
03 Jun 17
Moves
41191
14 Jul 20

@wolfgang59 said
So other products are priced at "88" but by your own admission you don't know why and choose to assume it is for "some reason or another"?
Bravo.
Good investigation.

Could the "some reason or another" be ....
Do you honestly think that Pres. Trump is trying to secretly communicate to his base that he is a Nazi?

This is by definition a conspiracy, lol.