😂”Tied to Trump’ is doing an awful lot of work in that sentence. EVERYONE in Washington is tied to someone, who is tied to someone else, who once knew somebody who had a cousin who donated to somebody.!!!!!😄That doesn’t establish corruption. Give me the specific act: what did Trump do, what law or ethical rule did he violate, and what evidence shows it? Otherwise, ‘tied to Trump’ is just a verylong piece of string. as my granny would say.
You are really funny in this one. Uhhh, I am tied to my cousin who is doing time for making too much money, but I think he got a bum rap!!!😀:
“😂 ‘Tied to Trump’ isn’t a corruption charge. My
“Of course I don’t like corruption. That’s precisely why I keep asking you to identify the specific corruption you’re alleging rather than giving me a list of things merely ‘tied to Trump.’”
@AverageJoe1
You pat yourself on your back thinking you actually won something. How about your senator Eric Schmitt making a complete fool out of himself today attacking Jack Smith who prosecuted Trump for STEALING HUNDREDS of TS doc. and the COVERUP of the stormy danilles case, if he has just given her a check there would NOT have been a coverup case against Trump But YOU are a TWO FACED FKING LIAR JUST LIKE YOUR LORD AND MASTER TRUMP.
You have so hypocritcal it makes my head swim and you still REFUSE to answer my question IS CORRUPTION, MAKING MONEY AS A POTUS would you consider that corruption if it was a DEMOCRAT POTUS,
And OF COURSE you would IN ABOUT THREE MINUTES you would cream in you jeans with joy a democrat gets charged with corruption because you, the person behind Average Joe are a WELL KNOWN double dealer,
Just like your Eric Schmitt making an ABSOLUTE fool of himself accusing Smith of purgery, you should JUMP on that one, where Schmitt called Smith a and I QUOTE "you are a DIRTBAG" to the most decorated and respected prosecutor in the US who was prosecuitiong war crimes in Europe, didn't you asssholes call him a DIRTBAG then.
But the SECOND Trump is prosecuted SUCCESSFULLY and the conviction was not by Smith but by the FKING JURY and SCHMITT accussed Smith of collusion with another Trump Prosecutor.
That CREEP SCHMITT hought he NAILED Smith by accusing him of going to a Hawks game and seeing that woman prosecuter, and trading prosecutorial snips but the problem PROVEN was Smith was at a Hawks game but a MARYLAND college game and had VIDEIO proof when he wa seen ON TV in the audience .
Before he was able to get around with that SCHMITT brought out text message saying he was at a Hawks game which SCHMITT being totally disingenuous AND STUPID for not actually doing diligent search was PERMANENTLY labled a CARD CARRYING ASSSHOLE.
Smith's SHOW TRIAL showed just how WORTHLESS republican senators are, like LAST NIGHT all fkking NIGHT long they passed a bill, not about the Iran war, or affordabiliy or Hormuz they passed some arcane bill about professional football.
REAL BIG DEAL OF COURSE SO THEY CAN SAY WE ARE WORKING FOR THE PEOPLE, WHAT A FKING JOKE IF IT WASN"T SO SAD to see our government stoop to such mind blowingly Iincompetent IDIOTS on the repub side.
@sonhouse saidSmith ‘says that he proved beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump committed crimes.”
@AverageJoe1
You pat yourself on your back thinking you actually won something. How about your senator Eric Schmitt making a complete fool out of himself today attacking Jack Smith who prosecuted Trump for STEALING HUNDREDS of TS doc. and the COVERUP of the stormy danilles case, if he has just given her a check there would NOT have been a coverup case against Trump But YOU ...[text shortened]... N"T SO SAD to see our government stoop to such mind blowingly Iincompetent IDIOTS on the repub side.
HE SAYS THAT.
You can “say”something, so can Suzianne. Some people here ‘say’ that housing should be a right. Since it certainly is not, (it is not in the Constitution ) , then they lie, or misrepresent. Smith lies and misrepresents. So your man (and Marauder’s) has really let you down, voids your entire post.
No findings of crimes. Did I mention that? Jesus. What is a good drug to relieve TDS.? Is it chronic?
@AverageJoe1 saidFunny thing about that, IT WAS PROVEN IN COURT YOU IDIOT, well you KNOW exactly what happened maybe on Jan 6, 150 officers severely injured and some died later and your FUKHEAD Trump PARDONS 1500 people who did that and all those BALLESS assssholes after being evacuated on Jan 6 now pull off BS attack on SMITH? WHAT THE FK IS GOING ON HERE? NONE of them defended by a single word the FACTS of Trumps CONVICTIONS and all they have now is GHASTLY attacks on the prosecutor?
Smith ‘says that he proved beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump committed crimes.”
HE SAYS THAT.
You can “say”something, so can Suzianne. Some people here ‘say’ that housing should be a right. Since it certainly is not, (it is not in the Constitution ) , then they lie, or misrepresent. Smith lies and misrepresents. So your man (and Marauder’s) has really let you d ...[text shortened]... ngs of crimes. Did I mention that? Jesus. What is a good drug to relieve TDS.? Is it chronic?
I guess you figure democrats are SO STUPID they would think that attack on a LITERAL WORLD CLASS prosecuter called away from WAR CRIMES prosecutions, yeah, who gives a rats ass about THAT? Don't see those sinister rebpubs attacking Smith for that and the debacle is STILL playing out today.
With a LOT of media covering that KANGAROO court by Kennedy and SCHMITT, the REAL assshole in all this confusing one Haws name for another thinking he really had Smith now and we all saw it play out on TV like that assshole bringing out a poster FOR ONE SECOND.
Smith asked to see it and was REFKING FUSED to show it to him and SCHMITT smirking like the fking IDIOT he really is. THOSE are your repub BALLESS senators not even SLIGHTLY interested in helping US CITIZENS instead passing a law on some arcane BASKETBALL rules
WOW, REALLY helps bring down diesel or gas or price of bacon which I saw in our local Weis for FOURTEEN DOLLARS A POUND and YOU keep up the TRUMP jargon the economy is the GREATEST IT EVER HAS BEEN.
@sonhouse saidWHAT was proven in court?!?!?! So, Trump was convicted of crimes…is he impeached, doing time ? I don’t get you here.
Funny thing about that, IT WAS PROVEN IN COURT YOU IDIOT, well you KNOW exactly what happened maybe on Jan 6, 150 officers severely injured and some died later and your FUKHEAD Trump PARDONS 1500 people who did that and all those BALLESS assssholes after being evacuated on Jan 6 now pull off BS attack on SMITH? WHAT THE FK IS GOING ON HERE? NONE of them defended by a single ...[text shortened]... RTEEN DOLLARS A POUND and YOU keep up the TRUMP jargon the economy is the GREATEST IT EVER HAS BEEN.
And if it was proven in court, what was the Hearing all about. Why did Smith even have to say that he thinks he found ‘evidence of crime’, when in fact, crime had already been adjudicated by a court?!?!?. I do not get what you were trying to tell us. Nobody does. in such Do you see the problem here? ??
State facts, no rants, and see where that takes us. How would you like it if I got crazy about Kamala and AOC ,….to me, they are lunatics, and there are no men in your party… just women who want stuff from other people. Is that a fact.???? You don’t want me to do that.kind of ranting…..
And you are incessant, rambling, and ranting would bore the horns off of a Billygoat.
@AverageJoe1 saidGo on your endless Trump only campaign, REAL people know what is going on.
WHAT was proven in court?!?!?! So, Trump was convicted of crimes…is he impeached, doing time ? I don’t get you here.
And if it was proven in court, what was the Hearing all about. Why did Smith even have to say that he thinks he found ‘evidence of crime’, when in fact, crime had already been adjudicated by a court?!?!?. I do not get what you were trying to tell us ...[text shortened]... anting…..
And you are incessant, rambling, and ranting would bore the horns off of a Billygoat.
You haven't mentioned Hunter in a few days.
@sonhouse saidSo I am correct to point out that he has NOT been convicted, and that there is no evidence of corruption.
Go on your endless Trump only campaign, REAL people know what is going on.
You haven't mentioned Hunter in a few days.
Yes, the Jack Smth did say that he has proven it, but he is one of 350,000,009. People like you agree with him in general conversation, but there has been no such thing . Why, such a story would cause a societal upheaval! Impeachment, jail……..
If it were the case, you would tell us……with links from the court!,!
So let it go man, you were doing better to tell us we have Donald by the b—ls on the Epstein matter🤣
@AverageJoe1 saidWhy are every one of you hypocrites?
WHAT was proven in court?!?!?! So, Trump was convicted of crimes…is he impeached, doing time ? I don’t get you here.
And if it was proven in court, what was the Hearing all about. Why did Smith even have to say that he thinks he found ‘evidence of crime’, when in fact, crime had already been adjudicated by a court?!?!?. I do not get what you were trying to tell us ...[text shortened]... anting…..
And you are incessant, rambling, and ranting would bore the horns off of a Billygoat.
@AverageJoe1 saidHead in the sand.
So I am correct to point out that he has NOT been convicted, and that there is no evidence of corruption.
Yes, the Jack Smth did say that he has proven it, but he is one of 350,000,009. People like you agree with him in general conversation, but there has been no such thing . Why, such a story would cause a societal upheaval! Impeachment, jail……..
If it we ...[text shortened]... So let it go man, you were doing better to tell us we have Donald by the b—ls on the Epstein matter🤣
You do you.
Hate to be you on the morning of Jan 21, 2029.
@AverageJoe1 saidSure, you WANT a two teir system where REPUB POTUS get away with murder LITERALLY but a democrat, HANG THE SOB.
So I am correct to point out that he has NOT been convicted, and that there is no evidence of corruption.
Yes, the Jack Smth did say that he has proven it, but he is one of 350,000,009. People like you agree with him in general conversation, but there has been no such thing . Why, such a story would cause a societal upheaval! Impeachment, jail……..
If it we ...[text shortened]... So let it go man, you were doing better to tell us we have Donald by the b—ls on the Epstein matter🤣
So tell me, it is ok for there to be corruption no matter which party?
@sonhouse saidWell corruption is OK in the Democratic Party. You see, now, I am answering your question right now. I think it was about corruption in the Democratic Party. Let us try these SIX instance of corruption in the Democratic Party. Do you see how I directly answer? A learning moment.
Sure, you WANT a two teir system where REPUB POTUS get away with murder LITERALLY but a democrat, HANG THE SOB.
So tell me, it is ok for there to be corruption no matter which party?
Weaponizing Democratic Party misinformation developed with probable Foreign spies
Protecting Democrats POTUS pick whilst slandering republican POTUS pick
Totally dismissing Foreign funds transfers for Clinton, but not for Trump
Refusing interviews with special council
Refusing to obey congressional subpoenas about records on the Biden corruption
Here is a link. You like LONG ones!!!!
https://www.congress.gov/118/meeting/house/116122/documents/HHRG-118-JU00-20230621-SD010.pdf
Oh by the way, did you write this, that it was ‘proven in court’?
“””””Funny thing about that, IT WAS PROVEN IN COURT YOU IDIOT, well you KNOW exactly what happened maybe on Jan 6, 150 officers severely injured and …..”
@AverageJoe1 saidYou mean corruption is NOT ok in repub world? You mean if you find corruption in repubs, ignore it, a demorcat HANG THE SON OF A BITCH.
Well corruption is OK in the Democratic Party. You see, now, I am answering your question right now. I think it was about corruption in the Democratic Party. Let us try these SIX instance of corruption in the Democratic Party. Do you see how I directly answer? A learning moment.
Weaponizing Democratic Party misinformation developed with probable Foreign spies
Prot ...[text shortened]... OU IDIOT, well you KNOW exactly what happened maybe on Jan 6, 150 officers severely injured and …..”
@sonhouse saidSettle, please. In a nutshelll, silly, you said repubs Are guilty of corruption. I wrote you 5 instances of proven Dem corruption in response, being the excellent debater that I am,
You mean corruption is NOT ok in repub world? You mean if you find corruption in repubs, ignore it, a demorcat HANG THE SON OF A BITCH.
I would have expected you, as a really excellent debater, to respond with proven corruption of Repubs.
It Is Not Too Late!!! Debate!
PS: if you respond with baseless opinion, I will say “no one wants your opinions!!! “ 🙂