2 edits
@Mott-The-Hoople saidNo "federal law" is mentioned in that statute.
and there you are…a misdemeanor NY doesnt not have the authority to enfoce federal law
that is where you lied
You remain stupid and brainwashed.
And off-topic, of course. Trump's lawyers can make all these claims on appeal.
@Mott-The-Hoople saidNow this is a lie:
and there you are…a misdemeanor NY doesnt not have the authority to enfoce federal law
that is where you lied
Mott: To this day no one knows the predicate crime that made these felonies, not even you…you are a loser pos
And then you posted your knowledge of the instructions given to the jury that specified what the "predicate crimes" which elevated the charge to a felony were.
So shame on you, Mott.
1 edit
@Mott-The-Hoople saidThe predicate crime has already been mentioned: NY Election Law sec. 17-152. That requires the two or more persons conspire by unlawful means to promote or prevent the election of any person to a public office.
and there you are…a misdemeanor NY doesnt not have the authority to enfoce federal law
that is where you lied
As to what the "unlawful means" were, the Judge's instructions were clear:
"Although you must conclude unanimously that the
defendant conspired to promote or prevent the election of any
person to a public office by unlawful means, you need not be
unanimous as to what those unlawful means were.
In determining whether the defendant conspired to
promote or prevent the election of any person to a public office
by unlawful means, you may consider the following unlawful
means: (1) violations of the Federal Election Campaign Act
otherwise known as FECA; (2) the falsification of other business
records; or (3) violation of tax laws."
https://www.nycourts.gov/LegacyPDFS/press/PDFs/People%20v.%20DJT%20Jury%20Instructions%20and%20Charges%20FINAL%205-23-24.pdf at p. 44
1 edit
@no1marauder saidNot going to read this crap, since it is number 149 of the attacks you have put on this man. We hear you and bedmate, Sonhouse…..we get the venom.
Judge Marchan did a fine job in pre-trial proceedings and at the trial in May where Trump was found guilty of 34 counts of a felony offense. But his post-trial actions have been filled with errors based on too little respect for the law and too much deference to the convicted criminal in the case.
Trump should have been sentenced in September. Marchan taking into accou ...[text shortened]... n sentence is not viable, then Trump should at least receive a hefty fine and a period of probation.
Look what the people who work for Biden have cooked up to thwart our president. You and they are sickening, you do not disappoint.
Do you think for a second that Biden came up with this? A 1953 law? Yet, you follow, you and Sonhouse, the usual lemmings, your queer yellow brick road .
https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/nation-politics/biden-expected-to-permanently-ban-oil-drilling-in-some-federal-waters/
1 edit
@AverageJoe1 saidSo you barge into a thread with no intention to actually discuss what it is about.
Not going to read this crap, since it is number 149 of the attacks you have put on this man. We hear you and bedmate, Sonhouse…..we get the venom.
Look what the people who work for Biden have cooked up to thwart our president. You and they are sickening, you do not disappoint.
Do you think for a second that Biden came up with this? A 1953 law? Yet, you follow, y ...[text shortened]... /nation-world/nation-politics/biden-expected-to-permanently-ban-oil-drilling-in-some-federal-waters/
That makes you even more of an a@@hole than usual.
If you want to discuss Biden's actions, start another thread. Not a single right winger wants to actually debate the topic of this thread for fairly obvious reasons.
Biden is not a convicted criminal BTW, but Donald Trump is.
EDIT: It is hilarious that your link says Trump used the exact same law to ban drilling in coastal areas for 10 years from Florida to North Carolina. I don't recall you bitching about that.
@no1marauder saidYou know, we know what you people are doing, anything to drag down Trump. Sue him, put him in an orange jumpsuit, raid his house but not Biden’s, I am astounded. That There is not more media about what the hell has happened to Trump over these years.. he has never harmed anyone, outside of what the law allows, such as bankruptcy, which is tough on the creditors etc. unfortunate for someone who gave Trump credit. That is business. Libs do not understand business.
So you barge into a thread with no intention to actually discuss what it is about.
That makes you even more of an a@@hole than usual.
If you want to discuss Biden's actions, start another thread. Not a single right winger wants to actually debate the topic of this thread for fairly obvious reasons.
Biden is not a convicted criminal BTW, but Donald Trump is.
E ...[text shortened]... coastal areas for 10 years from Florida to North Carolina. I don't recall you bitching about that.
This is why I tire of you and SHouse with your hellacious lawfare. This is why your biased crap is tiresome. Trump will leave you fellers in the dust. I will be sorry. You are blind, I can see. Said it and I’m glad. 😒
@no1marauder saidwhat was the crime shytweasel?
The predicate crime has already been mentioned: NY Election Law sec. 17-152. That requires the two or more persons conspire by unlawful means to promote or prevent the election of any person to a public office.
As to what the "unlawful means" were, the Judge's instructions were clear:
"Although you must conclude unanimously that the
defendant conspired to promote ...[text shortened]... FS/press/PDFs/People%20v.%20DJT%20Jury%20Instructions%20and%20Charges%20FINAL%205-23-24.pdf at p. 44
@Mott-The-Hoople saidWhat a freaking hypocrite.
the judge and prosecutor should be disbarred for malicious lawfare prosection
Its sad you liberal democrats make a mockery of our laws and abuse the power given to them.
To this day no one knows the predicate crime that made these felonies, not even you…you are a loser pos
"Its sad you liberal democrats make a mockery of our laws and abuse the power given to them."
This is you Trumpublicans. You call a rightful conviction "weaponization".
It is you mocking the justice system. And abuse of power? What would you call a con-man winning another election? A lot of people conned is what I call it.
@Mott-The-Hoople saidWhat, for the eleventh or twelfth time being told?
what was the crime shytweasel?
Why can't you just remember what you're told? You could at least look it up yourself. Asking yet again just shows how meager your claim is on intelligence. When you got talked into worshipping a liar and a con-man, did they surgically remove half your brain, too? Or is that why you were so easily talked into it?
I hope you eventually get something for selling your soul to Donald Trump. Not that it was worth anything to begin with, obviously. Maybe a free, "Made-in-China" MAGA cap?
@AverageJoe1 saidThis is the basic difference between Democrats and Trumpublicans. Democrats proudly tell the truth, like in the Jan 6 Committee. Trumpublicans proudly lie for their savior, Donald J. Trump, the con man.
You know, we know what you people are doing, anything to drag down Trump. Sue him, put him in an orange jumpsuit, raid his house but not Biden’s, I am astounded. That There is not more media about what the hell has happened to Trump over these years.. he has never harmed anyone, outside of what the law allows, such as bankruptcy, which is tough on the creditors etc. unfo ...[text shortened]... l leave you fellers in the dust. I will be sorry. You are blind, I can see. Said it and I’m glad. 😒
@no1marauder saidFrom a legal standpoint I'm sure this is correct, however, when you add this situation into the mix with a convicted criminal that is worshipped as a deity by millions and has also been recently elected President, this is what you end up with.
Judge Marchan did a fine job in pre-trial proceedings and at the trial in May where Trump was found guilty of 34 counts of a felony offense. But his post-trial actions have been filled with errors based on too little respect for the law and too much deference to the convicted criminal in the case.
Trump should have been sentenced in September. Marchan taking into accou ...[text shortened]... n sentence is not viable, then Trump should at least receive a hefty fine and a period of probation.
@no1marauder saidNo links!!!!!!! Thanks. Nothing more boring, but Shouse is a close 2nd.
So you barge into a thread with no intention to actually discuss what it is about.
That makes you even more of an a@@hole than usual.
If you want to discuss Biden's actions, start another thread. Not a single right winger wants to actually debate the topic of this thread for fairly obvious reasons.
Biden is not a convicted criminal BTW, but Donald Trump is.
E ...[text shortened]... coastal areas for 10 years from Florida to North Carolina. I don't recall you bitching about that.
@mchill saidThere's no reason a NY judge presiding over a criminal trial should take such irrelevancies into account.
From a legal standpoint I'm sure this is correct, however, when you add this situation into the mix with a convicted criminal that is worshipped as a deity by millions and has also been recently elected President, this is what you end up with.
@Mott-The-Hoople saidA President is an elected official who the People (indirectly through the EC) allow to run the Executive Branch of their Federal Government for a temporary period of time.
this will be overturned on appeal, no amount of wishful thinking from you perverts will change that. Deal with it, its over, Trump is now your master and he dont go for the freaky shyt.
That doesn't make him/her anybody's lord and/or master no matter what servile right wingers believe.