@Metal-Brain saidYou just wrote in the other thread that polls are rigged. So why ask for them here?
Lets see all the polls so we can se if they agree. They don't.
What does that tell you?
@Very-Rusty saiddude, have you ever thought of averaging out all of those polls that do not agree?
You may be one of those people who believe in Polls of a few people. I just don't believe in Polls, if they are voting polls sometimes they are close to being accurate but even they have a percentage of being wrong, so NO not a lot of faith in the Polls.
The CNN voting polls have been pretty close over the years, but even they have sometimes been off. So Polls are never a for sure thing.
-VR
@wildgrass saidAre you claiming all polls are accurate? No1 rejects Rassmussen polls. Is only one poll inaccurate? Only in no1's world.
You just wrote in the other thread that polls are rigged. So why ask for them here?
If polls are accurate why do they almost all contradict each other?
@Metal-Brain saidI have already said I do not believe in polls, perhaps read what I've said before you throw silly remarks at me. I have though noticed over the years CNN polls have been pretty accurate, although not always perfect.
dude, have you ever thought of averaging out all of those polls that do not agree?
-VR
1 edit
@Metal-Brain saidNo idea, I don't follow. You suggested polling people whether they thought trump rigged his own assassination?
Are you claiming all polls are accurate? No1 rejects Rassmussen polls. Is only one poll inaccurate? Only in no1's world.
If polls are accurate why do they almost all contradict each other?
Now you say we should not trust such polls. Good, let's move on.
Isn't it a bit concerning that there are no answers to all the questions? He was allegedly shot in the ear but there is no wound? 150 good guys with guns pretend not to see the weird guy on the roof, SS director Said shooter was virtually invisible, but dozens of random people at the rally were pointing him out? This was the first and only trump rally where secret service brought along a counter sniper? Authorities almost immediately release the name of the shooter, despite the fact he had no identification or criminal record? Secret service has no idea how many shooters are still out there, lets trump put his shoes on, fix his hair, and slowly pose for photos on stage, threat ongoing, while he's wounded? All campaign staff on media lockdown?
The whole thing looked fake in real time. People want to think it's real because of the bodies and the famous bullet photo that other photographers say it's impossible. But I've watched the video a bunch of times. It was staged.
@wildgrass said"- Trump's ear CLEARLY wasn't SHOT. "
Very few updates on this ongoing mystery and seemingly very few interested in the investigation, if it even exists. Almost like everyone just admits Trump staged it and moved on.
Police knew a suspicious gun carrying weird was galavanting around. Secret Service didn't communicate with SWAT until AFTER the shooting? They didn't tell them about the SHOOTER on the roof?
- Trump's ear CLEARLY wasn't SHOT. Why would he lie about that?
You are on the wrong thread. This is the "Trump had himself shot conspiracy theory". You have a Trump pretended to be shot conspiracy theory.
I am curious. Was it real or fake blood?
@wildgrass saidNot just that, but including that.
No idea, I don't follow. You suggested polling people whether they thought trump rigged his own assassination?
Now you say we should not trust such polls. Good, let's move on.
Isn't it a bit concerning that there are no answers to all the questions? He was allegedly shot in the ear but there is no wound? 150 good guys with guns pretend not to see the weird guy on the ...[text shortened]... other photographers say it's impossible. But I've watched the video a bunch of times. It was staged.
I suspect only Trump haters believe the Trump staged his being shot conspiracy theory. That is a minority of people but I suspect a majority of people believe a Trump assassination attempt conspiracy theory. One involving more than one shooter.
You seem to reject a second or more shooters theory. So Crooks was a lone shooter and a lousy shot who killed Corey by accident? Is snopes in on the conspiracy by saying a photo shopped bullet is real? Show me how far your rabbit hole goes.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/picture-trump-bullet/
@Metal-Brain saidWell you started the thread while Trump was still covering his ear with a giant gauze pad, so that title is understandable. But now we have seen that his ear was not even slightly wounded.
"- Trump's ear CLEARLY wasn't SHOT. "
You are on the wrong thread. This is the "Trump had himself shot conspiracy theory". You have a Trump pretended to be shot conspiracy theory.
I am curious. Was it real or fake blood?
At no point during his "shooting" did Trump act even slightly concerned that he was being shot at.
@wildgrass saidYou were duped by a picture before he got shot. You are gullible.
Well you started the thread while Trump was still covering his ear with a giant gauze pad, so that title is understandable. But now we have seen that his ear was not even slightly wounded.
At no point during his "shooting" did Trump act even slightly concerned that he was being shot at.
Why did you evade the snopes article that claims the bullet caught in the photo is legit? Do you dispute snopes? Yes or no?
@wildgrass
The poll, conducted by Redfield & Wilton Strategies exclusively for Newsweek, found that 47 percent of Republican voters believe that multiple people were involved in an effort to assassinate Donald Trump.
22 percent of Democrats who said they believe multiple people were involved, while 58 percent said one person was solely responsible, and 21 percent said they don't know.
https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-assassination-conspiracy-theory-polling-1933937
54 percent of those polled supported Cheatle's decision to resign, while 11 percent opposed it. That must mean 11% wanted Trump dead. Are you part of that 11%?
1 edit
@Metal-Brain saidNo there are lots of post "shooting" photos of Trump's ear.
You were duped by a picture before he got shot. You are gullible.
Why did you evade the snopes article that claims the bullet caught in the photo is legit? Do you dispute snopes? Yes or no?
I read an interview with a photographer who said he spent weeks setting up to shoot a photo of a bullet in the air during a biathlon event, when he knew exactly when the shot would be fired. He said if the photo at Trump's rally was indeed a bullet then it was a once in a million chance and that the photographer was using a camera with an insane shutter speed that made no sense to use at a trump rally.
@wildgrass saidSo you are saying Snopes is wrong. Right?
No there are lots of post "shooting" photos of Trump's ear.
I read an interview with a photographer who said he spent weeks setting up to shoot a photo of a bullet in the air during a biathlon event, when he knew exactly when the shot would be fired. He said if the photo at Trump's rally was indeed a bullet then it was a once in a million chance and that the photographer was using a camera with an insane shutter speed that made no sense to use at a trump rally.
1 edit
@Metal-Brain saidSnopes conclusion was "what else could it be..." which is fair. But why was that photographer using a camera and a shutter speed designed for capturing extremely fast moving objects at a trump rally?
So you are saying Snopes is wrong. Right?
“Most cameras used to capture images of bullets in flight are using extremely high-speed specialty cameras not normally utilized for regular photography, so catching a bullet on a side trajectory as seen in that photo would be a one-in-a-million shot and nearly impossible to catch even if one knew the bullet was coming,”
Other issues of course are that the trajectory of the bullet seems too low to have clipped his ear, and from the side that bullet could have been many feet in front or behind him. And of course the issue that trump wasn't wounded.
@wildgrass saidWhat is your source of information?
Snopes conclusion was "what else could it be..." which is fair. But why was that photographer using a camera and a shutter speed designed for capturing extremely fast moving objects at a trump rally?
“Most cameras used to capture images of bullets in flight are using extremely high-speed specialty cameras not normally utilized for regular photography, so catching a bull ...[text shortened]... d be a one-in-a-million shot and nearly impossible to catch even if one knew the bullet was coming,”