Trump had himself shot conspiracy theory

@wildgrass said
You can't zoom in? There's no wound, no scar, not a scratch. From a 1.8" bullet? No blood on his hand that grabbed his ear. No blood on his white shirt collar.

The official word from the white house was that trump had a 2 cm wide wound. Impossible to heal that fast.

The conspiracy theorists are the ones who think he was shot.

Yes, because blood never washes off. It is like a permanent marker.
And because you cannot personally examine his ear in person it all one big conspiracy. It nicked his lobe. Did you expect half of his ear to be gone? LOL!

And the moon landing was staged too, right?
Your arguments have devolved to the point that they are no better than that.
You do realize that, don't you? Or do you still insist it is not a conspiracy theory that his assassination was staged?

Why doesn't Trump say Prison Slavery Kamala? Because it is staged like pro wrestling. He is supposed to get into a who is weirder smack talk instead of the really hurtful stuff. It is a conspiracy. Should I deny it is a conspiracy theory like you did using the same type of logic? Trump will not say "Prison Slavery Kamala" so it is obviously staged.

See? You sound no different than me. Everything is obvious. Isn't it incredible that nobody else sees it? Nope. Everybody sees what they want to see and it is no surprise others do not see what is the obvious.....to you. Your conspiracy theory resulted from your disappointment the assassination failed. Admit it.

@Metal-Brain said
Yes, because blood never washes off. It is like a permanent marker.
And because you cannot personally examine his ear in person it all one big conspiracy. It nicked his lobe. Did you expect half of his ear to be gone? LOL!

And the moon landing was staged too, right?
Your arguments have devolved to the point that they are no better than that.
You do realize that, don ...[text shortened]... to you. Your conspiracy theory resulted from your disappointment the assassination failed. Admit it.

It nicked his lobe

You don't need to examine the ear to look at his recent interviews and clearly tell he wasn't shot. Still, the trump campaign said and continues to say that the hole was 2 centimeters wide and requires no stitches because trump is a fast healer. Other than that, they are completely silent on what happened.

Also secret service continues to say they never saw the shooter until he started shooting. That story seems impossible.

I dunno it's hard to say what really happened when all the official statements are clearly lies.

@wildgrass said

It nicked his lobe

You don't need to examine the ear to look at his recent interviews and clearly tell he wasn't shot. Still, the trump campaign said and continues to say that the hole was 2 centimeters wide and requires no stitches because trump is a fast healer. Other than that, they are completely silent on what happened.

Also secret service continues ...[text shortened]...

I dunno it's hard to say what really happened when all the official statements are clearly lies.

So Crooks missed and Trump was not shot in the ear? Is that what you are saying?

@wildgrass said
You can't zoom in? There's no wound, no scar, not a scratch. From a 1.8" bullet? No blood on his hand that grabbed his ear. No blood on his white shirt collar.

The official word from the white house was that trump had a 2 cm wide wound. Impossible to heal that fast.

The conspiracy theorists are the ones who think he was shot.

Show me the evidence!
You make outlandish claims and present no evidence.

@Metal-Brain said
Show me the evidence!
You make outlandish claims and present no evidence.

Lol. He has an ear and he isn't a lizard. What more evidence do you need?

@Metal-Brain said
Show me the evidence!
You make outlandish claims and present no evidence.

The only medical opinion comes from Trump's personal doctor who started that his wound was 2 centimeters and hit the cartilage of his ear.

That remains the only doctor report.

Based on his appearance and interviews 2 weeks after the incident, showing no sign of any injury, do you think that is true?

@wildgrass said
The only medical opinion comes from Trump's personal doctor who started that his wound was 2 centimeters and hit the cartilage of his ear.

That remains the only doctor report.

Based on his appearance and interviews 2 weeks after the incident, showing no sign of any injury, do you think that is true?

An earlobe nick is hardly a serious injury. Did you expect the bullet to take his whole ear off? You do realize that all of those secret service agents that surrounded Trump would have to be in on your conspiracy theory, right?

I thought you were saying Trump cut his own ear to make it look like he was shot, but you seem to think it was fake blood. Is that what you are saying? And all of the secret service were complicit in the conspiracy to murder Corey to make Trump look good. Is that also what you are saying?

@Metal-Brain said
An earlobe nick is hardly a serious injury. Did you expect the bullet to take his whole ear off? You do realize that all of those secret service agents that surrounded Trump would have to be in on your conspiracy theory, right?

I thought you were saying Trump cut his own ear to make it look like he was shot, but you seem to think it was fake blood. Is that what you are ...[text shortened]... mplicit in the conspiracy to murder Corey to make Trump look good. Is that also what you are saying?

You say the doctor was being truthful?

Try drawing a 2 centimeters wide hole in your ear lobe (the size of a quarter) and then tell me it was a nick. Tell me it would be normal for that to completely heal with no scarring in 2 weeks.

I have a paper cut from a few weeks ago that healed up nicely but I can still see the wound.

@wildgrass said
You say the doctor was being truthful?

Try drawing a 2 centimeters wide hole in your ear lobe (the size of a quarter) and then tell me it was a nick. Tell me it would be normal for that to completely heal with no scarring in 2 weeks.

I have a paper cut from a few weeks ago that healed up nicely but I can still see the wound.

"2 centimeters wide hole in your ear lobe"

You are clearly claiming it was no nick. I might buy that if we were talking about Alfred E. Neuman. What is your source of information?

https://en.wikipedia.org//wiki/Alfred_E._Neuman

@Metal-Brain said
"2 centimeters wide hole in your ear lobe"

You are clearly claiming it was no nick. I might buy that if we were talking about Alfred E. Neuman. What is your source of information?

https://en.wikipedia.org//wiki/Alfred_E._Neuman

No that was Trump's claim and the doctors report. He's a fast healer I guess. Like a lizard?

He's obviously lying about it.

@wildgrass said
No that was Trump's claim and the doctors report. He's a fast healer I guess. Like a lizard?

He's obviously lying about it.

What is your source of information?

@Metal-Brain said
What is your source of information?

Pick any website, it was widely reported.

For example

https://www.axios.com/2024/07/20/trump-ear-injury-shooting-update-jackson

@wildgrass said
Pick any website, it was widely reported.

For example

https://www.axios.com/2024/07/20/trump-ear-injury-shooting-update-jackson

The title to that article is this:

Trump shooting left 2cm wound in his ear, former physician says

Former? Explain that.

@Metal-Brain said
The title to that article is this:

Trump shooting left 2cm wound in his ear, former physician says

Former? Explain that.

If you read past the title, you would know the answer.

@wildgrass said
If you read past the title, you would know the answer.

No. Explain "former". Did Trump fire his doctor after he was treated for a bullet grazing of his ear? If not what does the opinion of a doctor that never saw his wound mean anything?