@Metal-Brain saidOf course not, you get your news from Russia.
What lazy blacks? I have no idea what you are talking about.
@Metal-Brain said1) there was no visible damage to the ear
No. All of those coincidences make sense if there was a real conspiracy to assassinate Trump. Your "it was staged" conspiracy theory is a leap from a real assassination attempt to something more complex.
2) If it wasn't staged then he put himself and security staff at high risk of being shot for about 40 seconds too long, for a photo op.
Make sense of tht.
@wildgrass saidYes, there was visible damage to the ear. The upper lobe to be specific. You are denying the photo exists.
1) there was no visible damage to the ear
2) If it wasn't staged then he put himself and security staff at high risk of being shot for about 40 seconds too long, for a photo op.
Make sense of tht.
@Metal-Brain saidWhat photo? The upper lobe is not a real thing.
Yes, there was visible damage to the ear. The upper lobe to be specific. You are denying the photo exists.
@wildgrass saidUpper lobes do not exist?
What photo? The upper lobe is not a real thing.
I saw the picture from a link you posted. You falsely claimed there should be a hole in his ear. He is not Alfred E. Neuman you silly man.
@Metal-Brain saidThe upper lobe does not exist.
Upper lobes do not exist?
I saw the picture from a link you posted. You falsely claimed there should be a hole in his ear. He is not Alfred E. Neuman you silly man.
The definition of the ear lobe is the lower part of the ear.
@wildgrass
The pic I saw was a groove a couple inches long where a pencil would have been placed on his ear. Didn't look to me like it came from shrapnel, which I think would have left a bigger mark and not as straight like what it looked like say a pencil scratching the side of the head where it would have gone.
I think shrapnel would have penetrated a lot deeper and probably stuck in his head also.
@sonhouse saidWhat picture did you see? I've seen many where the ear is completely uninjured
@wildgrass
The pic I saw was a groove a couple inches long where a pencil would have been placed on his ear. Didn't look to me like it came from shrapnel, which I think would have left a bigger mark and not as straight like what it looked like say a pencil scratching the side of the head where it would have gone.
I think shrapnel would have penetrated a lot deeper and probably stuck in his head also.
It's well known that ears take awhile to heal. Piercings can take 6 months.
1 edit
@wildgrass
There was no or little damage to the ear proper, the crease was in his head like I said where you would park a pencil.
There is a picture of the flight of the actual bullet that shows it was not shrapnel
https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/14/politics/video/doug-mills-trump-rally-photo-src-digvid
@sonhouse saidThis photo has been discussed ad nauseum.
@wildgrass
There was no or little damage to the ear proper, the crease was in his head like I said where you would park a pencil.
There is a picture of the flight of the actual bullet that shows it was not shrapnel
https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/14/politics/video/doug-mills-trump-rally-photo-src-digvid
No we were discussing the "injury" to the ear. Apparently healed a bullet wound in weeks in an area of the human body where a small scrape can take months to heal.
@sonhouse saidThat link is unavailable.
@wildgrass
There was no or little damage to the ear proper, the crease was in his head like I said where you would park a pencil.
There is a picture of the flight of the actual bullet that shows it was not shrapnel
https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/14/politics/video/doug-mills-trump-rally-photo-src-digvid
Post another one.
@Metal-Brain saidShow me the 2 cm wide wound in his ear lobe.
That link is unavailable.
Post another one.
@wildgrass saidWho said it was a 2 cm wide wound in his ear lobe?
Show me the 2 cm wide wound in his ear lobe.
Provide your source.
@Metal-Brain saidPosted multiple times and you read and you responded.
Who said it was a 2 cm wide wound in his ear lobe?
Provide your source.