@Suzianne saidSue, you and I are in the informal situtation referenced here. Hey, how did they know I would ask this of AI????
Look asshole, one last time. I am not a "feller".
YOU are the turds for brains who got the entire country to hate on Biden for high prices (which are not his fault, but the fault of corporations, which YOU support), and then now you think Trump is a HERO for raising prices DIRECTLY with tariffs?
You idiots deserve everything you get. Too bad you have to drag the rest of us down with you.
""Yes, a girl can be called "fellow" - while traditionally used more for men, "fellow" can be used in a gender-neutral way to refer to anyone, including a woman, especially in informal situations or when wanting to emphasize a sense of camaraderie or shared experience. ""
3 edits
@AverageJoe1 saidYes, we all know that you're a fairy nice little feller, smaller than average joe boy; so what's your liars little point feller joe?
Sue, you and I are in the informal situtation referenced here. Hey, how did they know I would ask this of AI????
""Yes, a girl can be called "fellow" - while traditionally used more for men, "fellow" can be used in a gender-neutral way to refer to anyone, including a woman, especially in informal situations or when wanting to emphasize a sense of camaraderie or shared experience. ""
@AverageJoe1 said"Those people" at their desks are doing the work for the People.
?????? First you say above, that the government's job is to serve the people... . 2 clicks up.
Musk is doing his darndest, 24/7 with Trump, to serve the people, by getting rid of fraud,,waste and abuse and all kinds of stuff. Stealing, for instance. It is billions that will come back to oour treasury.....to be used to Benefit The People!
To do that, it mea ...[text shortened]... et your point.
Are you saying to keep these people at those desks so that they will make money?
Of course you'll never understand that.
YOU and your cronies are the ones destroying the jobs and lives of those government employees, all so your rich friends can get a tax break.
Like I said, disgusting.
@AverageJoe1 saidI suppose you don't know what it means to be in need.
So they serve rhe people by creating wealth for our treasury....OR , OR, OR , OR, ...hold on to your hats....we are going to make our citizens dependent on the government.
Sue, did you ACTUALLY put the word 'depend' in your comment? brrrrrrrrrr
Yet you choose to make those people's lives more difficult.
That makes you a public menace, not an advocate for them.
Your time would be better spent helping them, not screwing them.
@Suzianne said? Get real. They are not doing the work of the people. There is no work to be done at that particular desk, so the government is telling the person that has been sitting at that best that no one needs to be there anymore because there is no work there to be done for the people.
"Those people" at their desks are doing the work for the People.
Of course you'll never understand that.
YOU and your cronies are the ones destroying the jobs and lives of those government employees, all so your rich friends can get a tax break.
Like I said, disgusting.
You will not respond to this, because you do not recognize common sense. I just hate that for you.
@Suzianne saidPlease allow me to follow through… you are saying that someone, or something, or making the lives of people more difficult.
I suppose you don't know what it means to be in need.
Yet you choose to make those people's lives more difficult.
That makes you a public menace, not an advocate for them.
Your time would be better spent helping them, not screwing them.
I wish you would start another thread on this very specific scenario that you propose. We are not socialist here, where the government supports people. It is not in the constitution for us to do so so, or for the government to do so.
Please tell us from whence a right is enjoyed by people ‘to be supported’.
Yes, I am being cynical, but it is very difficult to approach a premise, such as yours in a serious vein. I don’t know iof anyone who makes people have lives that are difficult, and I do not know where the government makes people have lives that are difficult.
@AverageJoe1 saidWhile I have you, are cool that you qualify as a fellow? Shall we run it by kewpie?
Sue, you and I are in the informal situtation referenced here. Hey, how did they know I would ask this of AI????
""Yes, a girl can be called "fellow" - while traditionally used more for men, "fellow" can be used in a gender-neutral way to refer to anyone, including a woman, especially in informal situations or when wanting to emphasize a sense of camaraderie or shared experience. ""
@AverageJoe1 saidHave you done that job?
? Get real. They are not doing the work of the people. There is no work to be done at that particular desk, so the government is telling the person that has been sitting at that best that no one needs to be there anymore because there is no work there to be done for the people.
You will not respond to this, because you do not recognize common sense. I just hate that for you.
How do you possibly know what they know?
I know that when I call a government agency for help, I'm on hold forever, probably because there aren't enough employees there now. Trump will only make this worse.
@AverageJoe1 saidPardon me for beating you with this yet again, but you should read this until you believe it.
Please allow me to follow through… you are saying that someone, or something, or making the lives of people more difficult.
I wish you would start another thread on this very specific scenario that you propose. We are not socialist here, where the government supports people. It is not in the constitution for us to do so so, or for the government to do so.
Pleas ...[text shortened]... at are difficult, and I do not know where the government makes people have lives that are difficult.
"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
This is the very first paragraph of the US Constitution and it outlines what is the job of our Government. Notice it does NOT say that they must ensure the rich stay rich.
You and Trump and his troop of baboons are trying to change this.
Why do you hate the Constitution?
@Earl-of-Trumps saidWhat's wrong with you?
the '28 dem platform...? depends. Have they learned their lesson?
Nahhh! I see them coming right back with a Sino/black transwoman for president.
@Suzianne saidBut, It does NOT say a lot things. Think about it. You only weaken your arguments when you suggest all answers are in those few sentences. I am so glad that I do not have to state some of the 'omitted' items. You can figure it out without me. Do you know that Shav says everyone has a right to free housing?
Pardon me for beating you with this yet again, but you should read this until you believe it.
"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish thi ...[text shortened]... u and Trump and his troop of baboons are trying to change this.
Why do you hate the Constitution?
@AverageJoe1 saidIn a perfect society, or perhaps, a more perfect union, people would have a right to free housing and a right to a free education. It always shocks me how some people are so against our country having an educated electorate, but then it speaks volumes when one thinks about why Republicans are so dead against that.
But, It does NOT say a lot things. Think about it. You only weaken your arguments when you suggest all answers are in those few sentences. I am so glad that I do not have to state some of the 'omitted' items. You can figure it out without me. Do you know that Shav says everyone has a right to free housing?
@Suzianne saidThis is not a perfect society. Witness the fruit-basket turnover of the last 4 years.
In a perfect society, or perhaps, a more perfect union, people would have a right to free housing and a right to a free education. It always shocks me how some people are so against our country having an educated electorate, but then it speaks volumes when one thinks about why Republicans are so dead against that.
So, a fresh start? Your ideas really sound doable, you think?