Go back
White privilege is real

White privilege is real

Debates


@Mott-The-Hoople said
At some point blacks have to quit blaming someone else for their failings.

Other races don’t make them act like they do.

A great place to start is to get them to quit killing each other
In countries all over the world the black community needs to find a scapegoat for which to blame their ailments. Nobody blames themselves, but the common issues are all the same. Their personal lives are a mess, broken homes, unfaithful fathers and mothers with several children with several men, low education and training. They occupy lowend jobs and are prone to drug abuse and crime. All of these things are their own fault, and they can all be fixed by having stable families.


@AThousandYoung said
The government is at fault. Lawsuits seem appropriate.
At fault how?


@Sleepyguy said
At fault how?
Same crime, same place, same judge, same defense, vastly different outcomes for no clear reason.

1 edit

@shavixmir said
But what about Ireland?
Can’t the same be claimed about protestants against catholics?

It’s a privilege, but is it white?
That’s what worries me.

How can one claim white privige about poor, uneducated white people, living in trailers without healthcare?

Yes. Black folk in many countries suffer harrassement because of their colour. Agreed.

But a great many peop ...[text shortened]... y is, that “white” privilge, although technically correct, ends up alienating a whole lot of people.
Gangs of New York

Bill the Butcher: “I don't see no Americans. I see trespassers, Irish harps. Do a job for a nickel what a n* does for a dime and a white man used to get a quarter for.”


@Mott-The-Hoople said
At some point blacks have to quit blaming someone else for their failings.

Other races don’t make them act like they do.

A great place to start is to get them to quit killing each other
You refuse to read this thread, don't you?

2 edits

@AThousandYoung said
Same crime, same place, same judge, same defense, vastly different outcomes for no clear reason.
Different juries. Jurors aren't the government.


@AThousandYoung said
Same crime, same place, same judge, same defense, vastly different outcomes for no clear reason.
you know this isnt over with right?

you do know the black woman had two trials?

1 edit

@Sleepyguy said
Different juries. Jurors aren't the government.
this last trial was messed up because of three liberal white women that could blank out the heinous crime and allow a murderer to escape. one white conservative male stopped them. nothing to do with race...all to do with liberalism

these liberals think it is ok to kill children in the womb up to nine months, now they are taking it a step further


@Rajk999 said
In countries all over the world the black community needs to find a scapegoat for which to blame their ailments. Nobody blames themselves, but the common issues are all the same. Their personal lives are a mess, broken homes, unfaithful fathers and mothers with several children with several men, low education and training. They occupy lowend jobs and are prone to drug abuse ...[text shortened]... rime. All of these things are their own fault, and they can all be fixed by having stable families.
What was I saying earlier about old, tired, same-old stereotypes?

Oh, yes. THIS is racism. All black people are the same to you.

Just like all Muslims are the same to you.


Welcome to America, Archie Bunker.


@Mott-The-Hoople said
this last trial was messed up because of three liberal white women that could blank out the heinous crime and allow a murderer to escape. one white conservative male stopped them. nothing to do with race...all to do with liberalism
Bullsh--.


@Suzianne said
What was I saying earlier about old, tired, same-old stereotypes?

Oh, yes. THIS is racism. All black people are the same to you.

Just like all Muslims are the same to you.


Welcome to America, Archie Bunker.
just like all white people are the same to you? racist!


@Suzianne said
You refuse to read this thread, don't you?
you didnt read my post did you?

2 edits

@Sleepyguy said
Different juries. Jurors aren't the government.
The government lawyers have a responsibility to screen the juries. They interview jurors and dismiss them for various reasons.

I get dismissed every time because they always send me to the DUI courts and as a science teacher I am familiar with the various technologies and methods involved. They don’t like that.

One time could be a fluke but if there is a statistically demonstrable pattern of bias then it needs to be addressed.

14th Amendment

I’m not certain about my position btw I could be wrong for various reasons but it does seem that provable bias in the justice system should be challengable.


@Rajk999 said
What is the cause of 'black problems' in a country where there is no 'white privilege', like say in the Caribbean or in African countries.
Did you read my post?

Try to tell me there is no 'white privilege' in South Africa.

This thread is about 'white privilege' in America, where it is most prevalent, and where this black woman did not escape justice in her trial, as the white woman did. And this goes beyond the jury. Lindsay Clancy became a media darling, and a poster child for women's mental health inequality, long before the trial was over. The media barely covered Latarsha Sanders' trial. This is systemic racism, the mother of 'white privilege'.

Go back and read my disclaimer.


Plus, it is nonsense that other countries experience NO 'white privilege'. Many girls in Africa, as well as the Caribbean, grow up wishing their skin were lighter. This is a worldwide effect, especially since America has come to dominate the world in trade. ANY society where whites and blacks are in close proximity experience SOME degree of 'white privilege' (even if it is only economic in shape). It's been this way since the colonial period. The first whites into some of these countries (even the Americas) decried that the country was 'full of savages', and they were subsequently treated that way for hundreds of years.


@AThousandYoung said
The government lawyers have a responsibility to screen the juries. They interview jurors and dismiss them for various reasons.

I get dismissed every time because they always send me to the DUI courts and as a science teacher I am familiar with the various technologies and methods involved. They don’t like that.

One time could be a fluke but if there is a statis ...[text shortened]... or various reasons but it does seem that provable bias in the justice system should be challengable.
Each side screens the jury to best benefit their own client. That seems like a system designed to be fair to both sides, i.e. systemically fair, not systemically racist.