Go back
Any Wiki Editors?

Any Wiki Editors?

General

Vote Up
1
Vote Down

what about this wiki....???

http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Red_Hot_Pawn

Vote Up
1
Vote Down

Originally posted by Kewpie
Does anyone - possibly Russ - have a copy of the original Wikipedia page that was removed on 4 January 2009 ?
You could try The Wayback Machine.

Vote Up
1
Vote Down

Originally posted by Schlecter
what about this wiki....???

http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Red_Hot_Pawn
Last line in the uncyclopedia entry is funny:
"It is highly illegal to use an engine for assistance playing chess or inputting moves faster than humanly possible. It is also utterly undetectable, and thus practiced by about 98% of players."

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Schlecter
what about this wiki....???

http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Red_Hot_Pawn
"Welcome to the Mother Ship of amateur comedy writing!"

That's their banner. 'Nuf said. Not worth giving them the time of day.

Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
I'm just saying that responsible reporting must offer the bad with the good.

Not doing so is called bias.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Suzianne
I'm just saying that responsible reporting must offer the bad with the good.

Not doing so is called bias.
Or artistic license.

Vote Up
3
Vote Down

Originally posted by moonbus
"Welcome to the Mother Ship of amateur comedy writing!"

That's their banner. 'Nuf said. Not worth giving them the time of day.
It's a sad day when there isn't time for a smile. 🙁

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by HandyAndy
It's a sad day when there isn't time for a smile. 🙁
I've nothing against smiles. I only meant that uncyclopedia is not the appropriate model of unbiased and objective reporting. Russ didn't ask for a parody of RHP.

Vote Up
1
Vote Down

Originally posted by moonbus
Recommendation noted. Thanks.
I'd reckon it would be appropriate to include links to other chess web sites' wikipedia pages (if they have them) and state that they offer comparable facilities for chess play and related interaction or learning.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by moonbus
I've nothing against smiles. I only meant that uncyclopedia is not the appropriate model of unbiased and objective reporting. Russ didn't ask for a parody of RHP.
Nor did I.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
I'd reckon it would be appropriate to include links to other chess web sites' wikipedia pages (if they have them) and state that they offer comparable facilities for chess play and related interaction or learning.
Recommendation noted. Thx (1138)...

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by HandyAndy
Nor did I.
Non sum qualis eram. Nor am I. Cheers.

Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
Even those of us involved in the controversial bits of RHP, no longer care about things said, or done in the past. Majority of us you can almost hold a conversation with now. 😉


-VR

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Very Rusty
Even those of us involved in the controversial bits of RHP, no longer care about things said, or done in the past. Majority of us you can almost hold a conversation with now. 😉


-VR
Almost, eh? lol...

Vote Up
Vote Down
-1

Originally posted by moonbus
Thx (1138)...
Hah!

I see what you did there...

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.