Originally posted by darvlayadjacent fortifications are balls in some of the bigger maps, whats the point in playing if you can get a region but can't defend it. chained fortifications are much better for that. but unlimited helps my style of play more so we play that π
Play no cards and adjacent fotifications. That makes it more strategic.
Originally posted by trevor33No problem defending, it's just that advancement is more strategic, not just load all your armies into one country, swallow up whatever then re-distribute your armies how you like. That method of play is cheap and not as challenging, IMHO.
adjacent fortifications are balls in some of the bigger maps, whats the point in playing if you can get a region but can't defend it. chained fortifications are much better for that. but unlimited helps my style of play more so we play that π
Originally posted by darvlayoften in games you get the chance to knock someone out whos quite strong but with adjesent you can't try it because you can't get your troops back to defend your regions. thats why i don't like it that much, chained is ok for that though. there is a skill to unlimited play though which a lot of people don't take advantage of. but it doesn't matter that much, in at even game the best players going to win most of the time.
No problem defending, it's just that advancement is more strategic, not just load all your armies into one country, swallow up whatever then re-distribute your armies how you like. That method of play is cheap and not as challenging, IMHO.
Originally posted by huckleberryhoundi saw it, i heard people taking about that about a week ago, a bit crazy someone will be getting about 600 points for 1 win π
I've just joined a game with like 100 players.....something iffy here mee thinks. Go to Join Game to see if it's still there (first game on the list).