I didn't see "your" or "you're" in the original post. Correcting non-existent spelling errors is kind of stupid.
The guy is asking the question because he asked me about picture copyrights on the internet. I pointed out that a lot of avatars (as an example) are pictures that may be copyrighted, and that unless you are making money off the copyrighted material you are not actually violating copyrights. If you all have so much of a problem with a guy who is trying to learn, why is it that you don't have the same problems with the morons who just don't get it at all and refuse to ask questions? Give the dude a break. He's trying to find a perfectly legal way of getting images on the net, without breaking copyrights. More than can be said for a lot of people...
Originally posted by st00p1dfac3He's correcting his own spelling error in his own post. But yes, you didn't see "your' or "you're" in the original post and yes, correcting non-existent spelling errors is stupid (not even kind of).
I didn't see "your" or "you're" in the original post. Correcting non-existent spelling errors is kind of stupid.
The guy is asking the question because he asked me about picture copyrights on the internet. I pointed out that a lot of avatars (as an example) are pictures that may be copyrighted, and that unless you are making money off the copyrigh ...[text shortened]... on the net, without breaking copyrights. More than can be said for a lot of people...
Originally posted by pawnhandlerAlright - that's it. You're my blue coloured arch-nemesis now. I challenge you to a duel at dawn in Boise, Idaho on the thirteenth of September...
He's correcting his own spelling error in his own post. But yes, you didn't see "your' or "you're" in the original post and yes, correcting non-existent spelling errors is stupid (not even kind of).
Originally posted by st00p1dfac3That's not correct. You are violating copyrights if you use copyrighted pictures without permission, no matter whether you make money out of it or not.
I pointed out that a lot of avatars (as an example) are pictures that may be copyrighted, and that unless you are making money off the copyrighted material you are not actually violating copyrights.
Originally posted by st00p1dfac3OK. Can we have mashed potatoes first? I mean, as long as we're in Idaho anyway... Besides, it's in bad form to duel on an empty stomach.
Alright - that's it. You're my blue coloured arch-nemesis now. I challenge you to a duel at dawn in Boise, Idaho on the thirteenth of September...
Originally posted by NordlysYou're (of course) right about that, but copyright lawsuits and whatnot, generally only come into effect when you are making money off of someone else's copyrighted material. As the example I used for Patrcik97, look at shortcircuit's Avatar. Someone took that picture - as with many of the avatars in here. Those are mainly unauthorised reproductions of images, but have not been legally actioned due to the fact that money has not been involved.
That's not correct. You are violating copyrights if you use copyrighted pictures without permission, no matter whether you make money out of it or not.
Originally posted by pawnhandlerYou can eat whatever you want - you will still feel the wrath of my +9 pea shooter, which has anti-black magic spells cast on it...
OK. Can we have mashed potatoes first? I mean, as long as we're in Idaho anyway... Besides, it's in bad form to duel on an empty stomach.