Originally posted by StarrmanThe FWS is merely loud. The Faith Whale Requiem, if uttered by a whale dying in open air at your dry dock whaling station, would cause the destruction of most structures and life inside the M25. You would be branded a genocidal maniac, and Darvin would never trust you to be the atheist-father of his children.
I'm just lulling you into a false sense of security, soon I'll have chased you straight into my dry dock whaling station where you will be killed by electrocution and preserved and stuffed before being displayed, tied to the London Eye. London loves to watch a dying whale.
Originally posted by royalchickenOn the contrary, Darwin would applaud my definition of survival of the fittest. I would be proving that whales are merely a step on which to climb the foodchain. Besides, Jeremy Bentham has suggested to me, in private, that a cull of humanity (particularly London) would be most efficacious on a Unitarian level.
The FWS is merely loud. The Faith Whale Requiem, if uttered by a whale dying in open air at your dry dock whaling station, would cause the destruction of most structures and life inside the M25. You would be branded a genocidal maniac, and Darvin would never trust you to be the atheist-father of his children.
Originally posted by StarrmanWhat, am I Darwin now?
On the contrary, Darwin would applaud my definition of survival of the fittest. I would be proving that whales are merely a step on which to climb the foodchain. Besides, Jeremy Bentham has suggested to me, in private, that a cull of humanity (particularly London) would be most efficacious on a Unitarian level.
Originally posted by StarrmanDarvin would not applaud this at all. He doesn't advocate survival of the fittest; evolutionary success in his mind consists of fitting as much genetic diversity as possible into a small population. A quick look at Sister Nordwhale's and my own avatars will demonstrate that FWs epitomise this principle.
On the contrary, Darwin would applaud my definition of survival of the fittest. I would be proving that whales are merely a step on which to climb the foodchain. Besides, Jeremy Bentham has suggested to me, in private, that a cull of humanity (particularly London) would be most efficacious on a Unitarian level.
The London Eye is round. The Baby Darvin Eye has a quarter-slant to it.
Originally posted by PhlabibitI can imagine some of the awkward questions you'll have to answer...
As hard as it is at time... it is so cool to have a kid. I can't wait til he's talking and I can tell him just how screwed up the world really is... and talk some baseball.
"daddy, why is baseball so boring?" "daddy, why does the world series of baseball only have american teams?", etc.
D
Originally posted by RagnorakDaddy, why do all of your friends say mean things about you on-line?
I can imagine some of the awkward questions you'll have to answer...
"daddy, why is baseball so boring?" "daddy, why does the world series of baseball only have american teams?", etc.
D
Daddy, what's a mothereffing mod?
Daddy, why are my eyes so far apart?
Originally posted by darvlayI figure if any of my organs start to fail, I can use my kids for parts.
While I don't agree with the choice of words that the General has used, I certainly feel that having children is the most important aspect of one's life and I dread at the thought of completing my life with no colony of Darv-babies to carry out my unholy bidding.
I get giddy when I think of aging and being the patriarch of a large culturally-diverse family. We're gonna be the poster-children for 21st Century melting pot families. F--k yeah!