Originally posted by eldragonflyYou are the one in this discussion who seems to be unable to follow simple logic. You said that if we can survive on a vegetarian diet, that means we are not herbivores. How on earth is that supposed to make sense?
You're joking, right??
Let's hope so. 😛
Simple logic too advanced for you, it would appear.
First let's define what a herbivore, carnivore, and "omnivore" is or is not.
Then we will examine what a "human being" is or is not supposed to eat. And what s/he can or cannot eat. And what is or is not supposed to be nutritious.
Not what one "wants" to eat, or just plain tastes good.
Originally posted by NordlysIrrelevant. And i never said such a thing. Gee that makes you a liar.
You are the one in this discussion who seems to be unable to follow simple logic. You said that if we can survive on a vegetarian diet, that means we are not herbivores. How on earth is that supposed to make sense?
Originally posted by eldragonflyOriginally posted by Palynka:
Irrelevant. And i never said such a thing. Gee that makes you a liar.
That we can survive on a vegetarian diet alone (I didn't even try to dispute that) doesn't mean we are herbivores, though.
Originally posted by eldragonfly:
It also means that we aren't herbivores.
2 edits
Originally posted by NordlysDo you even read what has been posted? Evidently not.
Originally posted by Palynka:
That we can survive on a vegetarian diet alone (I didn't even try to dispute that) doesn't mean we are herbivores, though.
Originally posted by eldragonfly:
It also means that we aren't herbivores.
Palynka said that just because one can obtain a healthy nutritious diet from a plant based diet doesn't mean that we are herbivores.
I merely showed that it also means that one cannot exclude the possiblity that we are herbivores either. That is to say i pointed out that it clearly doesn't exclude this possibility, that human beings could indeed be herbivores.
You have it all backwards. 🙄
Originally posted by eldragonflyI give up. If you can't see the difference between "It also means that we are not herbivores" and "It also means that one cannot exclude the possibility that we are not herbivores either", it's pointless to try to have a discussion with you.
Do you even read what has been posted? Evidently not.
Palynka said that just because one can obtain a healthy nutritious diet from a plant based diet [b]doesn't mean that we are herbivores.
I merely showed that it also means that one cannot exclude the possiblity that we are not herbivores either. That is to say i pointed out that it cle ...[text shortened]... s possibility, that human beings could indeed be herbivores.
You have it all backwards. 🙄[/b]
Originally posted by NordlysOops. i edited my above post. You still don't seem to get the logic behind this, which doesn't surprise me. 😴
I give up. If you can't see the difference between "It also means that we are not herbivores" and "It also means that one cannot exclude the possibility that we are not herbivores either", it's pointless to try to have a discussion with you.