Go back
Harry Potter

Harry Potter

General

Vote Up
Vote Down

Can you believe J.K. Rowling's talent?

The characters, the story, the intricacy, the involvement, the ending...I'm sad that it's over...just finished HP7.

Thoughts?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Evey Hammond
Can you believe J.K. Rowling's talent?

The characters, the story, the intricacy, the involvement, the ending...I'm sad that it's over...just finished HP7.

Thoughts?
Occasionally i have them, yes 😛

Vote Up
Vote Down

I just started reading them last week. I told my kids (they begged me to read them myself), that I wouldn't read them until they were all written, and the series was completed. I've started 2 other series, and have waited 18 months for the ensuing volumes. I'ts maddening.

I have so far completed the first two, and found them enjoyable light reading. I wouldn't say they're great, but they're good.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by duecer
I just started reading them last week. I told my kids (they begged me to read them myself), that I wouldn't read them until they were all written, and the series was completed. I've started 2 other series, and have waited 18 months for the ensuing volumes. I'ts maddening.

I have so far completed the first two, and found them enjoyable light reading. I wouldn't say they're great, but they're good.
It's great you're enjoying them and that you're reading them in sequence. I hope you keep reading... 🙂

Vote Up
Vote Down

"The Lord of the Rings" Trilogy was better

Vote Up
Vote Down

After spending a few minutes here I can easily say that all are lacking of any wit or intelligence whatsoever. You all believe yourselves to be better than everyone else, and I can tell you right now, that that is not the case in the slightest, you pseudo-intellectuals. I am much better than all of you. Clearly I am because I am neither pretentious, long-winded, asinine, discourteous, nor are my tastes quite as bland as yours. No, I am quite concise, and I would never stretch beyond that of my means or what I am designated to.

I'd have to say that this forum is full of anonymous lurkers, attackers, and trolls, who have nothing better to do than throw their elitist opinions around in an attempt at misguided show-boating with people they'd never ever meet.

None of you build any persona or stand by anything remotely attached that I can feel some sort of personal connection to. You lack any sort of direction and I can't have that. Your analogies are far too complicated, linear, and they're rather contradictory. Why, there's never even any variety here!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by schakuhr
After spending a few minutes here I can easily say that all are lacking of any wit or intelligence whatsoever. You all believe yourselves to be better than everyone else, and I can tell you right now, that that is not the case in the slightest, you pseudo-intellectuals. I am much better than all of you. Clearly I am because I am neither pretentious, long-wi ...[text shortened]... icated, linear, and they're rather contradictory. Why, there's never even any variety here!
Temerity 😛

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by yo its me
Temerity 😛
Probably temulency. And a big helping of copypasta.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Evey Hammond
Can you believe J.K. Rowling's talent?

The characters, the story, the intricacy, the involvement, the ending...I'm sad that it's over...just finished HP7.

Thoughts?
All stories/movies follow 1 of 8 possible general plot lines. These books are no different. In fact they are just slight alterations/variations of many many stories that have come before them in the past.

Dragons and wizards and evil plans of ultimate doom and intrigue are familiar as apple pie. Every 10 years there is a resurgence of certain genres as the new crop of kids grow up that haven't yet been exposed to what's come before them in the past.

I will grant you that the retelling of this story is well done but its success speaks more to society's lack of historical reference than it does to anything specific to the author.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down


Originally posted by uzless
I will grant you that the retelling of this story is well done but its success speaks more to society's lack of historical reference than it does to anything specific to the author.
Yeah, we should just stick to the eight "original" books and burn the rest. Then we can spend more time doing productive things things like playing chess and farting.

And why have sex more than once when all you need is historical reference?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Gatecrasher
Yeah, we should just stick to the eight "original" books and burn the rest. Then we can spend more time doing productive things things like playing chess and farting.

And why have sex more than once when all you need is historical reference?
Great post!

What is also always the same, is that people always try to criticise real talent in the hope of seeming superior.

The Harry Potter series is a work of genius. It is different from lord of the Rings but comparable in its brilliance.

The final book is the best and its seemlessness proves what tremendous vision and imagination Rowling has.

Vote Up
Vote Down

All Harry Potter is plagiarised Roald Dahl & Jill Murphy (The Worst Witch Series of books) with a variation of the Eton Wall game thrown in for a bit of sport...If I ever have kids they're gonna read Roald Dahl.

Thats my two pence, but its all down to personal opinion really...

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Goatboysrevenge
All Harry Potter is plagiarised Roald Dahl & Jill Murphy (The Worst Witch Series of books) with a variation of the Eton Wall game thrown in for a bit of sport...If I ever have kids they're gonna read Roald Dahl.

Thats my two pence, but its all down to personal opinion really...
Dont let them read any books at all 'Whats wrong with the telly?you dont want them growin up geeks do ya

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Goatboysrevenge
All Harry Potter is plagiarised Roald Dahl & Jill Murphy (The Worst Witch Series of books) with a variation of the Eton Wall game thrown in for a bit of sport...If I ever have kids they're gonna read Roald Dahl.

Thats my two pence, but its all down to personal opinion really...
Thats a very small amout of reading, surely they will not be so restricted?.

Roald Dahl is probably more of an original thinker with amazing creative ability. But JK is a master story teller of an epic tale.

Pliagiarised is far too strong a term, it denies JK's talent for humour and twists.