Originally posted by Ian68In short you are the biggest idiot since the departure of Saddam. You do not need to think with your behind to realise that no one not even Kasparov or Tal can claim to see tactically what Fritz cannot. If you or your sideshoots can claim so then why were the Fritz team wasting millions on the Kramnik match.
In short, your are the most obnoxious person I have come across on this site, and I'm sick of reading your drivel.
I have not made cheating accusations against anyone, its just its a very strange coincidence about the high rankings some players have here and their low/non-existent ratings on Online sites.
If you got off your high horse you would have made a serious attempt to play chess and even achived something - like being ranked over 2000. Euwe or Lasker said a reasonable player could become a Master. I posted how anyone even those over 85 could get to 2000.
What have you posted in the chess forum?
Originally posted by z00tHas it ever occurred to you that there might be people who don't care about getting ranked over 2000 because they just want to play chess as a relaxing game, rather than working hard on it? Has it ever occurred to you that people might have a life outside chess, and that it might not be easy or desirable to put a lot of work and concentration into chess after a long day at work and spending time with your family, or after working hard on some other hobby they may be very good at?
If you got off your high horse you would have made a serious attempt to play chess and even achived something - like being ranked over 2000. Euwe or Lasker said a reasonable player could become a Master. I posted how anyone even those over 85 could get to 2000.
Originally posted by z00tPersonally I find that talking about [or reading+writing about] chess is boring - but that's just me. I'd rather play a mediocre game for fun than spend ages analysing every move before and after.
In short you are the biggest idiot since the departure of Saddam. You do not need to think with your behind to realise that no one not even Kasparov or Tal can claim to see tactically what Fritz cannot. If you or your sideshoots can claim so then why were the Fritz team wasting millions on the Kramnik match.
I have not made cheating accusations against anyon ...[text shortened]... ed how anyone even those over 85 could get to 2000.
What have you posted in the chess forum?
Originally posted by Dr StrangeloveExactly doc! That is the enjoyment of chess. Sometimes you play good, sometimes bad.
Personally I find that talking about [or reading+writing about] chess is boring - but that's just me. I'd rather play a mediocre game for fun than spend ages analysing every move before and after.