Originally posted by ElleEffSeeeNeither have I. But if you were approaching a black hole you would stretch and not be even able to hold your own willy. In fact we are going backwards, relatively. The universe we live in is slowing down and will implode eventually, to a point at which it began. It will happen as fast as it exploded at the big bang. At that moment, if I were alive, I would love to be a sperm in my dada's bollks. Jut peeping out of the jap eye to see if it's really happening, and, if so, my god would I swim like Mark Spitz the other way!
I've got no particular desire to go swimming back up my dad's willy.
- Joined
- 23 Jul 05
- Moves
- 8869
Originally posted by mikelomIn fact we are going backwards, relatively. The universe we live in is slowing down and will implode eventually, to a point at which it began.
Neither have I. But if you were approaching a black hole you would stretch and not be even able to hold your own willy. In fact we are going backwards, relatively. The universe we live in is slowing down and will implode eventually, to a point at which it began. It will happen as fast as it exploded at the big bang. At that moment, if I were alive, I would l ...[text shortened]... o see if it's really happening, and, if so, my god would I swim like Mark Spitz the other way!
- Wrong! The universe is not slowing down, no, the speed at which it is expanding is increasing! It seems weird but this is actually the case.
Originally posted by Bad wolfSeen through 9 of the Calabi-Yau spaces... it is in fact slowing down faster than it is speeding up. Our perception of speed is all wrong! Relatively speaking of course.
[b]In fact we are going backwards, relatively. The universe we live in is slowing down and will implode eventually, to a point at which it began.
- Wrong! The universe is not slowing down, no, the speed at which it is expanding is increasing! It seems weird but this is actually the case.[/b]
Originally posted by Michelle PlassanPhillip K Dick (total recall and Do androids dream of electric sheep (better known as Bladerunner)) wrote a sci-fi book based on that, I tried to read it but have to give up it was quite hard work and I have to confess that I am not much of a reader.
The life cycle is all backwards.
You should die first, start out dead and get it out of the way.
Meet many of your friends and family at your Funeral and see who really cares.
Then you wake up in an old age home feeling better every day. You get kicked out for being too healthy, go collect your pension, then, when you start work, you get a gol ...[text shortened]... spa, room service on tap, larger quarters every day and finally...you finish off as an orgasm!
Originally posted by stevetoddSo you don't read about Holymorphic Sympletic Manifolds then?
Phillip K Dick (total recall and Do androids dream of electric sheep (better known as Bladerunner)) wrote a sci-fi book based on that, I tried to read it but have to give up it was quite hard work and I have to confess that I am not much of a reader.
Originally posted by mikelomRe-
So you don't read about Holymorphic Sympletic Manifolds then?
A holomorphic symplectic manifold (X, ¾ðŸ˜‰ is a compact complex
manifold X together with an everywhere non-degenerate holomorphic twoform
¾ 2 H0(X,2
X). Here, we call ¾ everywhere non-degenerate if ¾ induces
an isomorphism TX ! X.
In scouse...... space laaaaaaaaaaa.
Originally posted by mikelomI didn't see the point (other than for historical reasons) holomorphic sympletic manifolds never really worked and were based on over enthuisicastic scientists in too much of a hurry, don't you think? I mean they never really solved the FULL connection to the brain, as far as I know every subject not only died within 5 years, but suffered brain tissue loss within 6 months
Re-
A holomorphic symplectic manifold (X, ¾ðŸ˜‰ is a compact complex
manifold X together with an everywhere non-degenerate holomorphic twoform
¾ 2 H0(X,2
X). Here, we call ¾ everywhere non-degenerate if ¾ induces
an isomorphism TX ! X.
In scouse...... space laaaaaaaaaaa.
Originally posted by stevetoddSteve, you should read metaphysical or medicine, not quantum or astro?
I didn't see the point (other than for historical reasons) holomorphic sympletic manifolds never really worked and were based on over enthuisicastic scientists in too much of a hurry, don't you think? I mean they never really solved the FULL connection to the brain, as far as I know every subject not only died within 5 years, but suffered brain tissue loss within 6 months
Originally posted by Dies IraeIt takes a little imagination dude. After all, our ability to create is what separates us from the lower forms of life on this speck of dust.
This is plan is full of logical flaws. How can you have friends when you wake up from being dead? And what if you are a successful business man who slowly reverts back into poverty and then a terrible job at McDonalds or the like. Also, would I be conscious when I have to not only witness but participate in my parents concieving me?
All in all, a v ...[text shortened]... a sent me and explain to her why her forwarded "10 BLoNde Jokes" don't really make any sense.
Originally posted by Michelle PlassanI think you have just seen the new advertisement showing on television.
The life cycle is all backwards.
You should die first, start out dead and get it out of the way.
Meet many of your friends and family at your Funeral and see who really cares.
Then you wake up in an old age home feeling better every day. You get kicked out for being too healthy, go collect your pension, then, when you start work, you get a gol ...[text shortened]... spa, room service on tap, larger quarters every day and finally...you finish off as an orgasm!
Are you going to sell us a car next?